<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 07:12:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-322256</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-322256</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-322256</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-322256</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-44330</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-44330</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;free5GC is an open-source implementation of the 5G core network. Prior to 4.2.2, free5GC&amp;#39;s NEF mounts the nnef-pfdmanagement route group without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A network attacker who can reach NEF on the SBI can use a forged or arbitrary bearer token (e.g. Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token) to read PFD application data via GET /applications and GET /applications/{appID}, and to create or delete PFD change-notification subscriptions via POST /subscriptions and DELETE /subscriptions/{subID}. Same root cause as the other NEF SBI findings: the route group is mounted without any inbound auth middleware. Unlike the OAM and traffic-influence groups, nnef-pfdmanagement IS declared in the runtime ServiceList, so this is the production-intended path that operators expect to be protected by OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true -- and it is not. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.2.2.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;free5GC is an open-source implementation of the 5G core network. Prior to 4.2.2, free5GC&amp;#39;s NEF mounts the nnef-pfdmanagement route group without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A network attacker who can reach NEF on the SBI can use a forged or arbitrary bearer token (e.g. Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token) to read PFD application data via GET /applications and GET /applications/{appID}, and to create or delete PFD change-notification subscriptions via POST /subscriptions and DELETE /subscriptions/{subID}. Same root cause as the other NEF SBI findings: the route group is mounted without any inbound auth middleware. Unlike the OAM and traffic-influence groups, nnef-pfdmanagement IS declared in the runtime ServiceList, so this is the production-intended path that operators expect to be protected by OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true -- and it is not. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.2.2.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-44330</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-rwww-x45w-p52w — free5GC's NEF nnef-pfdmanagement API is unauthenticated; forged bearer tokens can read PFD data and create/delete PFD s…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-rwww-x45w-p52w</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/free5gc/nef&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
free5GC&amp;#39;s NEF mounts the `nnef-pfdmanagement` route group without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A network attacker who can reach NEF on the SBI can use a forged or arbitrary bearer token (e.g. `Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token`) to read PFD application data via `GET /applications` and `GET /applications/{appID}`, and to create or delete PFD change-notification subscriptions via `POST /subscriptions` and `DELETE /subscriptions/{subID}`. Same root cause as the other NEF SBI findings: the route group is mounted without any inbound auth middleware. Unlike the OAM and traffic-influence groups, `nnef-pfdmanagement` IS declared in the runtime `ServiceList`, so this is the production-intended path that operators expect to be protected by `OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true` -- and it is not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
Validated against the NEF container in the official Docker compose lab.
- Source repo tag: `v4.2.1`
- Running Docker image: `free5gc/nef:v4.2.0`
- Runtime NEF commit: `5ce35eab`
- Docker validation date: 2026-03-11&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NEF advertises `OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true`, but the entire `nnef-pfdmanagement` route group is mounted with no inbound auth middleware, so forged-token requests reach the read and subscription handlers and execute against UDR-backed state.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Code evidence (paths in `free5gc/nef`):
- Route group mounted without auth middleware: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/server.go:56`
- Read routes exposed at `/applications` and `/applications/:appI…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/free5gc/nef&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
free5GC&amp;#39;s NEF mounts the `nnef-pfdmanagement` route group without inbound OAuth2/bearer-token authorization. A network attacker who can reach NEF on the SBI can use a forged or arbitrary bearer token (e.g. `Authorization: Bearer not-a-real-token`) to read PFD application data via `GET /applications` and `GET /applications/{appID}`, and to create or delete PFD change-notification subscriptions via `POST /subscriptions` and `DELETE /subscriptions/{subID}`. Same root cause as the other NEF SBI findings: the route group is mounted without any inbound auth middleware. Unlike the OAM and traffic-influence groups, `nnef-pfdmanagement` IS declared in the runtime `ServiceList`, so this is the production-intended path that operators expect to be protected by `OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true` -- and it is not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
Validated against the NEF container in the official Docker compose lab.
- Source repo tag: `v4.2.1`
- Running Docker image: `free5gc/nef:v4.2.0`
- Runtime NEF commit: `5ce35eab`
- Docker validation date: 2026-03-11&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;NEF advertises `OAuth2 setting receive from NRF: true`, but the entire `nnef-pfdmanagement` route group is mounted with no inbound auth middleware, so forged-token requests reach the read and subscription handlers and execute against UDR-backed state.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Code evidence (paths in `free5gc/nef`):
- Route group mounted without auth middleware: `NFs/nef/internal/sbi/server.go:56`
- Read routes exposed at `/applications` and `/applications/:appI…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-rwww-x45w-p52w</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
