<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 01:02:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-292305</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-292305</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-292305</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-292305</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-40910</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-40910</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;frp is a fast reverse proxy. From 0.43.0 to 0.68.0, frp contains an authentication bypass in the HTTP vhost routing path when routeByHTTPUser is used as part of access control. In proxy-style requests, the routing logic uses the username from Proxy-Authorization to select the routeByHTTPUser backend, while the access control check uses credentials from the regular Authorization header. As a result, an attacker who can reach the HTTP vhost entrypoint and knows or can guess the protected routeByHTTPUser value may access a backend protected by httpUser / httpPassword even with an incorrect Proxy-Authorization password. This issue affects deployments that explicitly use routeByHTTPUser. It does not affect ordinary HTTP proxies that do not use this feature. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.68.1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;frp is a fast reverse proxy. From 0.43.0 to 0.68.0, frp contains an authentication bypass in the HTTP vhost routing path when routeByHTTPUser is used as part of access control. In proxy-style requests, the routing logic uses the username from Proxy-Authorization to select the routeByHTTPUser backend, while the access control check uses credentials from the regular Authorization header. As a result, an attacker who can reach the HTTP vhost entrypoint and knows or can guess the protected routeByHTTPUser value may access a backend protected by httpUser / httpPassword even with an incorrect Proxy-Authorization password. This issue affects deployments that explicitly use routeByHTTPUser. It does not affect ordinary HTTP proxies that do not use this feature. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.68.1.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-40910</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-pq96-pwvg-vrr9 — frp has an authentication bypass in HTTP vhost routing when routeByHTTPUser is used for access control</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-pq96-pwvg-vrr9</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/fatedier/frp&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
frp contains an authentication bypass in the HTTP vhost routing path when `routeByHTTPUser` is used as part of access control. In proxy-style requests, the routing logic uses the username from `Proxy-Authorization` to select the `routeByHTTPUser` backend, while the access control check uses credentials from the regular `Authorization` header. As a result, an attacker who can reach the HTTP vhost entrypoint and knows or can guess the protected `routeByHTTPUser` value may access a backend protected by `httpUser` / `httpPassword` even with an incorrect `Proxy-Authorization` password.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects deployments that explicitly use `routeByHTTPUser`. It does not affect ordinary HTTP proxies that do not use this feature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
The issue is in `pkg/util/vhost/http.go`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In proxy-style requests using an absolute URI, the routing path extracts the username from `Proxy-Authorization` and stores it as the request `HTTPUser`, which is then used for `routeByHTTPUser` route selection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More specifically, `injectRequestInfoToCtx()` derives the routing user from `Proxy-Authorization`, while the original `ServeHTTP()` implementation used `req.BasicAuth()` for the authentication check.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because routing and authentication use different credential sources, a request can be routed to a protected backend based on the `Proxy-Authorization` username while the authentication check is not performed against the same credentials. This creates an authentication bypass when `route…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/fatedier/frp&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
frp contains an authentication bypass in the HTTP vhost routing path when `routeByHTTPUser` is used as part of access control. In proxy-style requests, the routing logic uses the username from `Proxy-Authorization` to select the `routeByHTTPUser` backend, while the access control check uses credentials from the regular `Authorization` header. As a result, an attacker who can reach the HTTP vhost entrypoint and knows or can guess the protected `routeByHTTPUser` value may access a backend protected by `httpUser` / `httpPassword` even with an incorrect `Proxy-Authorization` password.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects deployments that explicitly use `routeByHTTPUser`. It does not affect ordinary HTTP proxies that do not use this feature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details
The issue is in `pkg/util/vhost/http.go`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In proxy-style requests using an absolute URI, the routing path extracts the username from `Proxy-Authorization` and stores it as the request `HTTPUser`, which is then used for `routeByHTTPUser` route selection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More specifically, `injectRequestInfoToCtx()` derives the routing user from `Proxy-Authorization`, while the original `ServeHTTP()` implementation used `req.BasicAuth()` for the authentication check.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Because routing and authentication use different credential sources, a request can be routed to a protected backend based on the `Proxy-Authorization` username while the authentication check is not performed against the same credentials. This creates an authentication bypass when `route…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-pq96-pwvg-vrr9</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
