<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 18:24:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-278308</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-278308</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-278308</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-278308</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-34377</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-34377</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1, a logic error in Zebra&amp;#39;s transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction&amp;#39;s txid while providing invalid authorization data, a miner could cause vulnerable Zebra nodes to accept an invalid block, leading to a consensus split from the rest of the Zcash network. This would not allow invalid transactions to be accepted but could result in a consensus split between vulnerable Zebra nodes and invulnerable Zebra and Zcashd nodes. This issue has been patched in zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;ZEBRA is a Zcash node written entirely in Rust. Prior to zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1, a logic error in Zebra&amp;#39;s transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction&amp;#39;s txid while providing invalid authorization data, a miner could cause vulnerable Zebra nodes to accept an invalid block, leading to a consensus split from the rest of the Zcash network. This would not allow invalid transactions to be accepted but could result in a consensus split between vulnerable Zebra nodes and invulnerable Zebra and Zcashd nodes. This issue has been patched in zebrad version 4.3.0 and zebra-consensus version 5.0.1.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-34377</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-3vmh-33xr-9cqh — Zebra has a Consensus Failure due to Improper Verification of V5 Transactions</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3vmh-33xr-9cqh</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: zebrad, crates.io: zebra-consensus&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;---&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# CVE-2026-34377: Consensus Failure via Crafted V5 Authorization Data&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary
A logic error in Zebra&amp;#39;s transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction&amp;#39;s `txid` while providing invalid authorization data, a miner could cause vulnerable Zebra nodes to accept an invalid block, leading to a consensus split from the rest of the Zcash network.  To be clear, **this would not allow invalid transactions to be accepted** but could result in a consensus split between vulnerable Zebra nodes and invulnerable Zebra and Zcashd nodes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Severity
**High** - This is a Consensus Vulnerability that could allow a malicious miner to induce network partitioning, service disruption, and potential double-spend attacks against affected nodes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Affected Versions
All Zebra versions supporting V5 transactions (Network Upgrade 5 and later) prior to **version 4.3.0**.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Description
The vulnerability exists in the `find_verified_unmined_tx` function within `transaction.rs`. This function was designed to optimize block verification by checking if a transaction was already verified in the mempool.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lookup mechanism used the **ZIP-244 `txid`** as the unique key. However, for V5 transactions, the `txid` specifically excludes the **Authorization Data Root** (signatures and proofs). Because Zebra returned a &amp;#34;verified&amp;#34; status based solely on the `txid`, it skipped the essential `check_v5_auth()` call for the transaction…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: zebrad, crates.io: zebra-consensus&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;---&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# CVE-2026-34377: Consensus Failure via Crafted V5 Authorization Data&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary
A logic error in Zebra&amp;#39;s transaction verification cache could allow a malicious miner to induce a consensus split. By matching a valid transaction&amp;#39;s `txid` while providing invalid authorization data, a miner could cause vulnerable Zebra nodes to accept an invalid block, leading to a consensus split from the rest of the Zcash network.  To be clear, **this would not allow invalid transactions to be accepted** but could result in a consensus split between vulnerable Zebra nodes and invulnerable Zebra and Zcashd nodes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Severity
**High** - This is a Consensus Vulnerability that could allow a malicious miner to induce network partitioning, service disruption, and potential double-spend attacks against affected nodes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Affected Versions
All Zebra versions supporting V5 transactions (Network Upgrade 5 and later) prior to **version 4.3.0**.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Description
The vulnerability exists in the `find_verified_unmined_tx` function within `transaction.rs`. This function was designed to optimize block verification by checking if a transaction was already verified in the mempool.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The lookup mechanism used the **ZIP-244 `txid`** as the unique key. However, for V5 transactions, the `txid` specifically excludes the **Authorization Data Root** (signatures and proofs). Because Zebra returned a &amp;#34;verified&amp;#34; status based solely on the `txid`, it skipped the essential `check_v5_auth()` call for the transaction…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3vmh-33xr-9cqh</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
