<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 13:44:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-276425</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-276425</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-276425</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-276425</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-32693</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-32693</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In Juju from version 3.0.0 through 3.6.18, the authorization of the &amp;#34;secret-set&amp;#34; tool is not performed correctly, which allows a grantee to update the secret content, and can lead to reading or updating other secrets. When the &amp;#34;secret-set&amp;#34; tool logs an error in an exploitation attempt, the secret is still updated contrary to expectations, and the new value is visible to both the owner and the grantee.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In Juju from version 3.0.0 through 3.6.18, the authorization of the &amp;#34;secret-set&amp;#34; tool is not performed correctly, which allows a grantee to update the secret content, and can lead to reading or updating other secrets. When the &amp;#34;secret-set&amp;#34; tool logs an error in an exploitation attempt, the secret is still updated contrary to expectations, and the new value is visible to both the owner and the grantee.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-32693</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-439w-v2p7-pggc — Juju has unauthorized access to out-of-scope Kubernetes secrets</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-439w-v2p7-pggc</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/juju/juju&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Grantee is able to update secret content using the `secret-set` tool due to broad Kubernetes access policy.
Implications are that it is possible, knowing a Kubernetes secret identifier (e.g. name), to patch without affecting the secret, revealing the value, or, patching while affecting the secrets value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a Juju secret is &amp;#34;granted&amp;#34; to an app, that app should be able to read the secret content but not modify it, and should be able to only read secrets that have been granted to it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Authorization of the `secret-set` hook tool / controller request is not performed correctly, which allows the grantee to update the secret content and to read or affect other secrets.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### PoC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested:
- two applications in the same controller, same model: one owns the secret, another get a grant
- relation between them
- secret grant
- Linux AMD64, Canonical K8s, Juju 3.6.8 controller, Juju 3.6.9 CLI&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not tested:
- admin (user) secrets
- cross-model relations
- cross-controller relations&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```command
⋊&amp;gt; dima@bb ⋊&amp;gt; /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 &amp;#34;secret-add nice=little-value&amp;#34;
secret://9cf1319c-4f4b-44f8-891b-9d1c7d8d3b52/d350nbnmp25c76301ht0
⋊&amp;gt; dima@bb ⋊&amp;gt; /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju show-unit ingress2/0
ingress2/0:
  workload-version: 24.2.0
  opened-ports: []
  charm: ch:amd64/nginx-ingress-integrator-203
  leader: true
  life: alive
  relation-info:
  - relation-id: 11
    endpoint: ingress
    related-endpoint: ingress
    application-data: {}…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/juju/juju&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Grantee is able to update secret content using the `secret-set` tool due to broad Kubernetes access policy.
Implications are that it is possible, knowing a Kubernetes secret identifier (e.g. name), to patch without affecting the secret, revealing the value, or, patching while affecting the secrets value.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a Juju secret is &amp;#34;granted&amp;#34; to an app, that app should be able to read the secret content but not modify it, and should be able to only read secrets that have been granted to it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Authorization of the `secret-set` hook tool / controller request is not performed correctly, which allows the grantee to update the secret content and to read or affect other secrets.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### PoC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested:
- two applications in the same controller, same model: one owns the secret, another get a grant
- relation between them
- secret grant
- Linux AMD64, Canonical K8s, Juju 3.6.8 controller, Juju 3.6.9 CLI&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Not tested:
- admin (user) secrets
- cross-model relations
- cross-controller relations&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```command
⋊&amp;gt; dima@bb ⋊&amp;gt; /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju exec --unit ingress2/0 &amp;#34;secret-add nice=little-value&amp;#34;
secret://9cf1319c-4f4b-44f8-891b-9d1c7d8d3b52/d350nbnmp25c76301ht0
⋊&amp;gt; dima@bb ⋊&amp;gt; /c/hexanator on main ◦ juju show-unit ingress2/0
ingress2/0:
  workload-version: 24.2.0
  opened-ports: []
  charm: ch:amd64/nginx-ingress-integrator-203
  leader: true
  life: alive
  relation-info:
  - relation-id: 11
    endpoint: ingress
    related-endpoint: ingress
    application-data: {}…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-439w-v2p7-pggc</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
