<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2026 08:43:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>cnvd-2026-21718</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2026-21718</link>
      <description>cnvd-2026-21718</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2026-21718</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-276694</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-276694</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-276694</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-276694</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-3230</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-3230</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client&amp;#39;s authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client&amp;#39;s authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-3230</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-g3xr-5f55-cf5g</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g3xr-5f55-cf5g</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client&amp;#39;s authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client&amp;#39;s authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g3xr-5f55-cf5g</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-3230 — Improper key_share validation in TLS 1.3 HelloRetryRequest</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-3230</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-3230</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-3230</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-3230</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-3230</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:25.10: wolfssl, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: wolfssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client&amp;#39;s authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:25.10: wolfssl, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: wolfssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Missing required cryptographic step in the TLS 1.3 client HelloRetryRequest handshake logic in wolfSSL could lead to a compromise in the confidentiality of TLS-protected communications via a crafted HelloRetryRequest followed by a ServerHello message that omits the required key_share extension, resulting in derivation of predictable traffic secrets from (EC)DHE shared secret. This issue does not affect the client&amp;#39;s authentication of the server during TLS handshakes.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-3230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
