<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 14:47:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-367239</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-367239</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-367239</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-367239</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-24332</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-24332</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Discord through 2026-01-16 allows gathering information about whether a user&amp;#39;s client state is Invisible (and not actually offline) because the response to a WebSocket API request includes the user in the presences array (with &amp;#34;status&amp;#34;: &amp;#34;offline&amp;#34;), whereas offline users are omitted from the presences array. This is arguably inconsistent with the UI description of Invisible as &amp;#34;You will appear offline.&amp;#34; NOTE: a third-party report suggests that this was remediated later in 2026.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Discord through 2026-01-16 allows gathering information about whether a user&amp;#39;s client state is Invisible (and not actually offline) because the response to a WebSocket API request includes the user in the presences array (with &amp;#34;status&amp;#34;: &amp;#34;offline&amp;#34;), whereas offline users are omitted from the presences array. This is arguably inconsistent with the UI description of Invisible as &amp;#34;You will appear offline.&amp;#34; NOTE: a third-party report suggests that this was remediated later in 2026.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-24332</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-984h-8phv-mf43</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-984h-8phv-mf43</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Discord through 2026-01-16 allows gathering information about whether a user&amp;#39;s client state is Invisible (and not actually offline) because the response to a WebSocket API request includes the user in the presences array (with &amp;#34;status&amp;#34;: &amp;#34;offline&amp;#34;), whereas offline users are omitted from the presences array. This is arguably inconsistent with the UI description of Invisible as &amp;#34;You will appear offline.&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Discord through 2026-01-16 allows gathering information about whether a user&amp;#39;s client state is Invisible (and not actually offline) because the response to a WebSocket API request includes the user in the presences array (with &amp;#34;status&amp;#34;: &amp;#34;offline&amp;#34;), whereas offline users are omitted from the presences array. This is arguably inconsistent with the UI description of Invisible as &amp;#34;You will appear offline.&amp;#34;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-984h-8phv-mf43</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
