<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 09:03:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BIT-django-2026-15337 — Potential denial-of-service vulnerability in check_for_language()</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-django-2026-15337</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: django&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
`django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not routed by default. The consumed memory is bounded, since request data is limited by the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` setting (default 2.5 MB) and the cache holds a fixed maximum number of entries.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Jaeyoung Jang for reporting this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Bitnami: django&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
`django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not routed by default. The consumed memory is bounded, since request data is limited by the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` setting (default 2.5 MB) and the cache holds a fixed maximum number of entries.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Jaeyoung Jang for reporting this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-django-2026-15337</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-344163</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344163</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-344163</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344163</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-15337</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-15337</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
`django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not routed by default. The consumed memory is bounded, since request data is limited by the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` setting (default 2.5 MB) and the cache holds a fixed maximum number of entries.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Jaeyoung Jang for reporting this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
`django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not routed by default. The consumed memory is bounded, since request data is limited by the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` setting (default 2.5 MB) and the cache holds a fixed maximum number of entries.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Jaeyoung Jang for reporting this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-15337</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-2f9m-qhxg-w5v5</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-2f9m-qhxg-w5v5</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
`django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not routed by default. The consumed memory is bounded, since request data is limited by the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` setting (default 2.5 MB) and the cache holds a fixed maximum number of entries.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Jaeyoung Jang for reporting this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8.
`django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not routed by default. The consumed memory is bounded, since request data is limited by the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` setting (default 2.5 MB) and the cache holds a fixed maximum number of entries.
Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected.
Django would like to thank Jaeyoung Jang for reporting this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-2f9m-qhxg-w5v5</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-3496 — python-django security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3496</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: python-django&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. GeoDjango spatial lookups optimistically parse the right-hand-side value as a raster by passing it to the `django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` constructor. Any value used in a spatial lookup against a `GeometryField` or `RasterField` reaches this constructor, including untrusted input, for example a spatial-field filter submitted through the Django admin changelist query string by a staff user with view permission. A `dict`, or a `str` holding its JSON representation, is opened in write mode regardless of the constructor&amp;amp;apos;s `write=False` default, allowing a file with an attacker-chosen name and contents to be written through a file-backed GDAL driver. Any other `str` is treated as a datasource, allowing an outbound network request through a GDAL virtual filesystem handler. Writing a file to a location later imported by the application can result in remote code execution.(CVE-2026-15307)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. `django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not rou…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: python-django&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. GeoDjango spatial lookups optimistically parse the right-hand-side value as a raster by passing it to the `django.contrib.gis.gdal.GDALRaster` constructor. Any value used in a spatial lookup against a `GeometryField` or `RasterField` reaches this constructor, including untrusted input, for example a spatial-field filter submitted through the Django admin changelist query string by a staff user with view permission. A `dict`, or a `str` holding its JSON representation, is opened in write mode regardless of the constructor&amp;amp;apos;s `write=False` default, allowing a file with an attacker-chosen name and contents to be written through a file-backed GDAL driver. Any other `str` is treated as a datasource, allowing an outbound network request through a GDAL virtual filesystem handler. Writing a file to a location later imported by the application can result in remote code execution.(CVE-2026-15307)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. `django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not rou…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3496</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11464-1 — python313-Django-6.0.8-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11464-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;python313-Django-6.0.8-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;python313-Django-6.0.8-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11464-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:3503-1 — Security update for python-Django</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:3503-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for python-Django&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for python-Django&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:3503-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-15337</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-15337</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: python-django&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. `django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not routed by default. The consumed memory is bounded, since request data is limited by the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` setting (default 2.5 MB) and the cache holds a fixed maximum number of entries. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Jaeyoung Jang for reporting this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: python-django&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.17 and 6.0 before 6.0.8. `django.utils.translation.check_for_language()` is subject to a potential denial-of-service attack when given many distinct, very long language codes, which are retained as keys in an in-memory cache and consume process memory. Such codes reach the function through the `django.views.i18n.set_language()` view, which is not routed by default. The consumed memory is bounded, since request data is limited by the `DATA_UPLOAD_MAX_MEMORY_SIZE` setting (default 2.5 MB) and the cache holds a fixed maximum number of entries. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.1.x, 5.0.x, and 4.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Jaeyoung Jang for reporting this issue.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-15337</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2649 — Django: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2649</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Django ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriffe durchzuführen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Django ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Daten zu manipulieren, Cross-Site-Scripting-Angriffe durchzuführen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
