<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 11:05:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-373393</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-373393</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-373393</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-373393</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-48042</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-48042</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects ash: from 0.1.1 before 3.5.39.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in ash-project ash allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This issue affects ash: from 0.1.1 before 3.5.39.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-48042</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-jj4j-x5ww-cwh9 — Before action, Ash's hooks may execute in certain scenarios despite a request being forbidden</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-jj4j-x5ww-cwh9</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Hex: ash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
Certain bulk action calls with a `before_transaction` hook and no `after_transaction` hook, will call the `before_transaction` hook before authorization is checked and a Forbidden error is returned, when called as a bulk action.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The impact is that a malicious user could cause a `before_transaction` to run even though they are not authorized to perform the whole action. The `before_action` could run a sensitive/expensive operation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
A malicious user could cause a `before_action` to run even though they are not authorized to perform the whole action.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are affected if you have an create, update or destroy action that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- has a before_transaction hook on it, and no after_transaction hook on it.
- is being used via an `Ash.bulk_*` callback (which AshJsonApi and AshGraphql do for update/destroy actions)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whether or not or how much it matters depends on the nature of those before_transaction callbacks. If those before_transaction callbacks are side-effectful, or just doing something like looking up some external data. If your API endpoints are behind authentication and what kind.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Severity&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The severity for this was hard to gauge. `before_transaction` hooks are not that commonly used. Additionally, any attacker must know which of these things are available to them, be authenticated to make such a request (i.e you very rarely have policies preventing the running of anonymous queries), so privileges and inside knowledge are required. Additionally, the…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Hex: ash&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary
Certain bulk action calls with a `before_transaction` hook and no `after_transaction` hook, will call the `before_transaction` hook before authorization is checked and a Forbidden error is returned, when called as a bulk action.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The impact is that a malicious user could cause a `before_transaction` to run even though they are not authorized to perform the whole action. The `before_action` could run a sensitive/expensive operation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
A malicious user could cause a `before_action` to run even though they are not authorized to perform the whole action.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are affected if you have an create, update or destroy action that:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- has a before_transaction hook on it, and no after_transaction hook on it.
- is being used via an `Ash.bulk_*` callback (which AshJsonApi and AshGraphql do for update/destroy actions)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Whether or not or how much it matters depends on the nature of those before_transaction callbacks. If those before_transaction callbacks are side-effectful, or just doing something like looking up some external data. If your API endpoints are behind authentication and what kind.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Severity&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The severity for this was hard to gauge. `before_transaction` hooks are not that commonly used. Additionally, any attacker must know which of these things are available to them, be authenticated to make such a request (i.e you very rarely have policies preventing the running of anonymous queries), so privileges and inside knowledge are required. Additionally, the…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-jj4j-x5ww-cwh9</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
