<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 10:47:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-03111</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-03111</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-03111</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-03111</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2025-38525</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-38525</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2025-38525</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-1050 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1050</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-1050</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-1050</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-349700</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-349700</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-349700</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-349700</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2025-38525</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-38525</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc: Fix irq-disabled in local_bh_enable()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() function calls down into the IP layer to find
out the MTU size for a route.  When accepting an incoming call, this is
called from rxrpc_new_incoming_call() which holds interrupts disabled
across the code that calls down to it.  Unfortunately, the IP layer uses
local_bh_enable() which, config dependent, throws a warning if IRQs are
enabled:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5544 at kernel/softirq.c:387 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0
...
RIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0
...
Call Trace:
 &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 rt_cache_route+0x7e/0xa0
 rt_set_nexthop.isra.0+0x3b3/0x3f0
 __mkroute_output+0x43a/0x460
 ip_route_output_key_hash+0xf7/0x140
 ip_route_output_flow+0x1b/0x90
 rxrpc_assess_MTU_size.isra.0+0x2a0/0x590
 rxrpc_new_incoming_peer+0x46/0x120
 rxrpc_alloc_incoming_call+0x1b1/0x400
 rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0x1da/0x5e0
 rxrpc_input_packet+0x827/0x900
 rxrpc_io_thread+0x403/0xb60
 kthread+0x2f7/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
...
hardirqs last  enabled at (23): _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
hardirqs last disabled at (24): _raw_read_lock_irq+0x17/0x70
softirqs last  enabled at (0): copy_process+0xc61/0x2730
softirqs last disabled at (25): rt_add_uncached_list+0x3c/0x90&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by moving the call to rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() out of
rxrpc_init_peer() and further up the stack where it can be done without
interrupts disabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It shou…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc: Fix irq-disabled in local_bh_enable()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() function calls down into the IP layer to find
out the MTU size for a route.  When accepting an incoming call, this is
called from rxrpc_new_incoming_call() which holds interrupts disabled
across the code that calls down to it.  Unfortunately, the IP layer uses
local_bh_enable() which, config dependent, throws a warning if IRQs are
enabled:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5544 at kernel/softirq.c:387 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0
...
RIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0
...
Call Trace:
 &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 rt_cache_route+0x7e/0xa0
 rt_set_nexthop.isra.0+0x3b3/0x3f0
 __mkroute_output+0x43a/0x460
 ip_route_output_key_hash+0xf7/0x140
 ip_route_output_flow+0x1b/0x90
 rxrpc_assess_MTU_size.isra.0+0x2a0/0x590
 rxrpc_new_incoming_peer+0x46/0x120
 rxrpc_alloc_incoming_call+0x1b1/0x400
 rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0x1da/0x5e0
 rxrpc_input_packet+0x827/0x900
 rxrpc_io_thread+0x403/0xb60
 kthread+0x2f7/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
...
hardirqs last  enabled at (23): _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
hardirqs last disabled at (24): _raw_read_lock_irq+0x17/0x70
softirqs last  enabled at (0): copy_process+0xc61/0x2730
softirqs last disabled at (25): rt_add_uncached_list+0x3c/0x90&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by moving the call to rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() out of
rxrpc_init_peer() and further up the stack where it can be done without
interrupts disabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It shou…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2025-38525</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-6x2c-jc67-wp74</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-6x2c-jc67-wp74</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc: Fix irq-disabled in local_bh_enable()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() function calls down into the IP layer to find
out the MTU size for a route.  When accepting an incoming call, this is
called from rxrpc_new_incoming_call() which holds interrupts disabled
across the code that calls down to it.  Unfortunately, the IP layer uses
local_bh_enable() which, config dependent, throws a warning if IRQs are
enabled:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5544 at kernel/softirq.c:387 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0
...
RIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0
...
Call Trace:
 &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 rt_cache_route+0x7e/0xa0
 rt_set_nexthop.isra.0+0x3b3/0x3f0
 __mkroute_output+0x43a/0x460
 ip_route_output_key_hash+0xf7/0x140
 ip_route_output_flow+0x1b/0x90
 rxrpc_assess_MTU_size.isra.0+0x2a0/0x590
 rxrpc_new_incoming_peer+0x46/0x120
 rxrpc_alloc_incoming_call+0x1b1/0x400
 rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0x1da/0x5e0
 rxrpc_input_packet+0x827/0x900
 rxrpc_io_thread+0x403/0xb60
 kthread+0x2f7/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
...
hardirqs last  enabled at (23): _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
hardirqs last disabled at (24): _raw_read_lock_irq+0x17/0x70
softirqs last  enabled at (0): copy_process+0xc61/0x2730
softirqs last disabled at (25): rt_add_uncached_list+0x3c/0x90&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by moving the call to rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() out of
rxrpc_init_peer() and further up the stack where it can be done without
interrupts disabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It shou…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rxrpc: Fix irq-disabled in local_bh_enable()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() function calls down into the IP layer to find
out the MTU size for a route.  When accepting an incoming call, this is
called from rxrpc_new_incoming_call() which holds interrupts disabled
across the code that calls down to it.  Unfortunately, the IP layer uses
local_bh_enable() which, config dependent, throws a warning if IRQs are
enabled:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5544 at kernel/softirq.c:387 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0
...
RIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0
...
Call Trace:
 &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 rt_cache_route+0x7e/0xa0
 rt_set_nexthop.isra.0+0x3b3/0x3f0
 __mkroute_output+0x43a/0x460
 ip_route_output_key_hash+0xf7/0x140
 ip_route_output_flow+0x1b/0x90
 rxrpc_assess_MTU_size.isra.0+0x2a0/0x590
 rxrpc_new_incoming_peer+0x46/0x120
 rxrpc_alloc_incoming_call+0x1b1/0x400
 rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0x1da/0x5e0
 rxrpc_input_packet+0x827/0x900
 rxrpc_io_thread+0x403/0xb60
 kthread+0x2f7/0x310
 ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230
 ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30
...
hardirqs last  enabled at (23): _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50
hardirqs last disabled at (24): _raw_read_lock_irq+0x17/0x70
softirqs last  enabled at (0): copy_process+0xc61/0x2730
softirqs last disabled at (25): rt_add_uncached_list+0x3c/0x90&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by moving the call to rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() out of
rxrpc_init_peer() and further up the stack where it can be done without
interrupts disabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It shou…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-6x2c-jc67-wp74</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2025-38525 — rxrpc: Fix irq-disabled in local_bh_enable()</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-38525</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2025-38525</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2025-38525</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2025-38525</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-38525</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 90 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Fix irq-disabled in local_bh_enable() The rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() function calls down into the IP layer to find out the MTU size for a route.  When accepting an incoming call, this is called from rxrpc_new_incoming_call() which holds interrupts disabled across the code that calls down to it.  Unfortunately, the IP layer uses local_bh_enable() which, config dependent, throws a warning if IRQs are enabled: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5544 at kernel/softirq.c:387 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0 ... RIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0 ... Call Trace:  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;  rt_cache_route+0x7e/0xa0  rt_set_nexthop.isra.0+0x3b3/0x3f0  __mkroute_output+0x43a/0x460  ip_route_output_key_hash+0xf7/0x140  ip_route_output_flow+0x1b/0x90  rxrpc_assess_MTU_size.isra.0+0x2a0/0x590  rxrpc_new_incoming_peer+0x46/0x120  rxrpc_alloc_incoming_call+0x1b1/0x400  rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0x1da/0x5e0  rxrpc_input_packet+0x827/0x900  rxrpc_io_thread+0x403/0xb60  kthread+0x2f7/0x310  ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ... hardirqs last  enabled at (23): _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 hardirqs last disabled at (24): _raw_read_lock_irq+0x17/0x70 softirqs last  enabled at (0): copy_process+0xc61/0x2730 softirqs last disabled at (25): rt_add_uncached_list+0x3c/0x90 Fix this by moving the call to rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() out of rxrpc_init_peer() and further up the stack where it can be done without interrupts disabled. It shouldn&amp;#39;t…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 90 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: rxrpc: Fix irq-disabled in local_bh_enable() The rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() function calls down into the IP layer to find out the MTU size for a route.  When accepting an incoming call, this is called from rxrpc_new_incoming_call() which holds interrupts disabled across the code that calls down to it.  Unfortunately, the IP layer uses local_bh_enable() which, config dependent, throws a warning if IRQs are enabled: WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5544 at kernel/softirq.c:387 __local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0 ... RIP: 0010:__local_bh_enable_ip+0x43/0xd0 ... Call Trace:  &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;  rt_cache_route+0x7e/0xa0  rt_set_nexthop.isra.0+0x3b3/0x3f0  __mkroute_output+0x43a/0x460  ip_route_output_key_hash+0xf7/0x140  ip_route_output_flow+0x1b/0x90  rxrpc_assess_MTU_size.isra.0+0x2a0/0x590  rxrpc_new_incoming_peer+0x46/0x120  rxrpc_alloc_incoming_call+0x1b1/0x400  rxrpc_new_incoming_call+0x1da/0x5e0  rxrpc_input_packet+0x827/0x900  rxrpc_io_thread+0x403/0xb60  kthread+0x2f7/0x310  ret_from_fork+0x2a/0x230  ret_from_fork_asm+0x1a/0x30 ... hardirqs last  enabled at (23): _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x50 hardirqs last disabled at (24): _raw_read_lock_irq+0x17/0x70 softirqs last  enabled at (0): copy_process+0xc61/0x2730 softirqs last disabled at (25): rt_add_uncached_list+0x3c/0x90 Fix this by moving the call to rxrpc_assess_MTU_size() out of rxrpc_init_peer() and further up the stack where it can be done without interrupts disabled. It shouldn&amp;#39;t…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2025-38525</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-1858 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1858</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial of Service Angriff durchzuführen oder andere nicht spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-1858</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
