<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 05:18:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2025-07840</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-07840</link>
      <description>bdu:2025-07840</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2025-07840</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2024-56761</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-56761</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2024-56761</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2025-avi-0254 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0254</link>
      <description>certfr-2025-avi-0254</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2025-avi-0254</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>cnvd-2025-01666</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2025-01666</link>
      <description>cnvd-2025-01666</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cnvd-2025-01666</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-313852</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313852</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-313852</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-313852</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-56761</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-56761</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/fred: Clear WFE in missing-ENDBRANCH #CPs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An indirect branch instruction sets the CPU indirect branch tracker
(IBT) into WAIT_FOR_ENDBRANCH (WFE) state and WFE stays asserted
across the instruction boundary.  When the decoder finds an
inappropriate instruction while WFE is set ENDBR, the CPU raises a #CP
fault.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the &amp;#34;kernel IBT no ENDBR&amp;#34; selftest where #CPs are deliberately
triggered, the WFE state of the interrupted context needs to be
cleared to let execution continue.  Otherwise when the CPU resumes
from the instruction that just caused the previous #CP, another
missing-ENDBRANCH #CP is raised and the CPU enters a dead loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not a problem with IDT because it doesn&amp;#39;t preserve WFE and
IRET doesn&amp;#39;t set WFE.  But FRED provides space on the entry stack
(in an expanded CS area) to save and restore the WFE state, thus the
WFE state is no longer clobbered, so software must clear it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clear WFE to avoid dead looping in ibt_clear_fred_wfe() and the
!ibt_fatal code path when execution is allowed to continue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clobbering WFE in any other circumstance is a security-relevant bug.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[ dhansen: changelog rewording ]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/fred: Clear WFE in missing-ENDBRANCH #CPs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An indirect branch instruction sets the CPU indirect branch tracker
(IBT) into WAIT_FOR_ENDBRANCH (WFE) state and WFE stays asserted
across the instruction boundary.  When the decoder finds an
inappropriate instruction while WFE is set ENDBR, the CPU raises a #CP
fault.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the &amp;#34;kernel IBT no ENDBR&amp;#34; selftest where #CPs are deliberately
triggered, the WFE state of the interrupted context needs to be
cleared to let execution continue.  Otherwise when the CPU resumes
from the instruction that just caused the previous #CP, another
missing-ENDBRANCH #CP is raised and the CPU enters a dead loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not a problem with IDT because it doesn&amp;#39;t preserve WFE and
IRET doesn&amp;#39;t set WFE.  But FRED provides space on the entry stack
(in an expanded CS area) to save and restore the WFE state, thus the
WFE state is no longer clobbered, so software must clear it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clear WFE to avoid dead looping in ibt_clear_fred_wfe() and the
!ibt_fatal code path when execution is allowed to continue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clobbering WFE in any other circumstance is a security-relevant bug.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[ dhansen: changelog rewording ]&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-56761</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-q9hp-vwf8-w58f</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-q9hp-vwf8-w58f</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/fred: Clear WFE in missing-ENDBRANCH #CPs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An indirect branch instruction sets the CPU indirect branch tracker
(IBT) into WAIT_FOR_ENDBRANCH (WFE) state and WFE stays asserted
across the instruction boundary.  When the decoder finds an
inappropriate instruction while WFE is set ENDBR, the CPU raises a #CP
fault.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the &amp;#34;kernel IBT no ENDBR&amp;#34; selftest where #CPs are deliberately
triggered, the WFE state of the interrupted context needs to be
cleared to let execution continue.  Otherwise when the CPU resumes
from the instruction that just caused the previous #CP, another
missing-ENDBRANCH #CP is raised and the CPU enters a dead loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not a problem with IDT because it doesn&amp;#39;t preserve WFE and
IRET doesn&amp;#39;t set WFE.  But FRED provides space on the entry stack
(in an expanded CS area) to save and restore the WFE state, thus the
WFE state is no longer clobbered, so software must clear it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clear WFE to avoid dead looping in ibt_clear_fred_wfe() and the
!ibt_fatal code path when execution is allowed to continue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clobbering WFE in any other circumstance is a security-relevant bug.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[ dhansen: changelog rewording ]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;x86/fred: Clear WFE in missing-ENDBRANCH #CPs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An indirect branch instruction sets the CPU indirect branch tracker
(IBT) into WAIT_FOR_ENDBRANCH (WFE) state and WFE stays asserted
across the instruction boundary.  When the decoder finds an
inappropriate instruction while WFE is set ENDBR, the CPU raises a #CP
fault.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For the &amp;#34;kernel IBT no ENDBR&amp;#34; selftest where #CPs are deliberately
triggered, the WFE state of the interrupted context needs to be
cleared to let execution continue.  Otherwise when the CPU resumes
from the instruction that just caused the previous #CP, another
missing-ENDBRANCH #CP is raised and the CPU enters a dead loop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is not a problem with IDT because it doesn&amp;#39;t preserve WFE and
IRET doesn&amp;#39;t set WFE.  But FRED provides space on the entry stack
(in an expanded CS area) to save and restore the WFE state, thus the
WFE state is no longer clobbered, so software must clear it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clear WFE to avoid dead looping in ibt_clear_fred_wfe() and the
!ibt_fatal code path when execution is allowed to continue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Clobbering WFE in any other circumstance is a security-relevant bug.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[ dhansen: changelog rewording ]&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-q9hp-vwf8-w58f</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2024-56761 — x86/fred: Clear WFE in missing-ENDBRANCH #CPs</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-56761</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2024-56761</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2024-56761</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-56761</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-56761</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 105 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/fred: Clear WFE in missing-ENDBRANCH #CPs An indirect branch instruction sets the CPU indirect branch tracker (IBT) into WAIT_FOR_ENDBRANCH (WFE) state and WFE stays asserted across the instruction boundary.  When the decoder finds an inappropriate instruction while WFE is set ENDBR, the CPU raises a #CP fault. For the &amp;#34;kernel IBT no ENDBR&amp;#34; selftest where #CPs are deliberately triggered, the WFE state of the interrupted context needs to be cleared to let execution continue.  Otherwise when the CPU resumes from the instruction that just caused the previous #CP, another missing-ENDBRANCH #CP is raised and the CPU enters a dead loop. This is not a problem with IDT because it doesn&amp;#39;t preserve WFE and IRET doesn&amp;#39;t set WFE.  But FRED provides space on the entry stack (in an expanded CS area) to save and restore the WFE state, thus the WFE state is no longer clobbered, so software must clear it. Clear WFE to avoid dead looping in ibt_clear_fred_wfe() and the !ibt_fatal code path when execution is allowed to continue. Clobbering WFE in any other circumstance is a security-relevant bug. [ dhansen: changelog rewording ]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 105 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: x86/fred: Clear WFE in missing-ENDBRANCH #CPs An indirect branch instruction sets the CPU indirect branch tracker (IBT) into WAIT_FOR_ENDBRANCH (WFE) state and WFE stays asserted across the instruction boundary.  When the decoder finds an inappropriate instruction while WFE is set ENDBR, the CPU raises a #CP fault. For the &amp;#34;kernel IBT no ENDBR&amp;#34; selftest where #CPs are deliberately triggered, the WFE state of the interrupted context needs to be cleared to let execution continue.  Otherwise when the CPU resumes from the instruction that just caused the previous #CP, another missing-ENDBRANCH #CP is raised and the CPU enters a dead loop. This is not a problem with IDT because it doesn&amp;#39;t preserve WFE and IRET doesn&amp;#39;t set WFE.  But FRED provides space on the entry stack (in an expanded CS area) to save and restore the WFE state, thus the WFE state is no longer clobbered, so software must clear it. Clear WFE to avoid dead looping in ibt_clear_fred_wfe() and the !ibt_fatal code path when execution is allowed to continue. Clobbering WFE in any other circumstance is a security-relevant bug. [ dhansen: changelog rewording ]&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-56761</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2025-0016 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen Denial of Service</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0016</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder nicht spezifizierte Effekte zu erzeugen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein lokaler Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand zu erzeugen oder nicht spezifizierte Effekte zu erzeugen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2025-0016</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
