https://cve.radiocsirt.org Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Wed, 07 Oct 2026 17:41:05 +0000 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-214509 EUVD-2026-214509 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-214509 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-56169 <p>A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties (such as Fort) are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently uses its cache merely as a bandwidth saving tool (because fetching is performed through deltas). If a fetch fails midway or yields incorrect files, there is no viable fallback. This leads to incomplete route origin validation data.</p> <p>A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties (such as Fort) are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently uses its cache merely as a bandwidth saving tool (because fetching is performed through deltas). If a fetch fails midway or yields incorrect files, there is no viable fallback. This leads to incomplete route origin validation data.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-56169 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-pggg-fp6x-7ww3 <p>A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties (such as Fort) are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently uses its cache merely as a bandwidth saving tool (because fetching is performed through deltas). If a fetch fails midway or yields incorrect files, there is no viable fallback. This leads to incomplete route origin validation data.</p> <p>A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties (such as Fort) are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently uses its cache merely as a bandwidth saving tool (because fetching is performed through deltas). If a fetch fails midway or yields incorrect files, there is no viable fallback. This leads to incomplete route origin validation data.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-pggg-fp6x-7ww3 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-56169 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: fort-validator, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: fort-validator, Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS: fort-validator, Ubuntu:25.10: fort-validator, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: fort-validator</p> <p>A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties (such as Fort) are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently uses its cache merely as a bandwidth saving tool (because fetching is performed through deltas). If a fetch fails midway or yields incorrect files, there is no viable fallback. This leads to incomplete route origin validation data.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: fort-validator, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: fort-validator, Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS: fort-validator, Ubuntu:25.10: fort-validator, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: fort-validator</p> <p>A validation integrity issue was discovered in Fort through 1.6.4 before 2.0.0. RPKI Relying Parties (such as Fort) are supposed to maintain a backup cache of the remote RPKI data. This can be employed as a fallback in case a new fetch fails or yields incorrect files. However, the product currently uses its cache merely as a bandwidth saving tool (because fetching is performed through deltas). If a fetch fails midway or yields incorrect files, there is no viable fallback. This leads to incomplete route origin validation data.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-56169