<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 13:42:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-160983</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-160983</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-160983</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-160983</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-45311</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-45311</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Quinn is a pure-Rust, async-compatible implementation of the IETF QUIC transport protocol. As of quinn-proto 0.11, it is possible for a server to `accept()`, `retry()`, `refuse()`, or `ignore()` an `Incoming` connection. However, calling `retry()` on an unvalidated connection exposes the server to a likely panic in the following situations:  1. Calling `refuse` or `ignore` on the resulting validated connection, if a duplicate initial packet is received. This issue can go undetected until a server&amp;#39;s `refuse()`/`ignore()` code path is exercised, such as to stop a denial of service attack. 2. Accepting when the initial packet for the resulting validated connection fails to decrypt or exhausts connection IDs, if a similar initial packet that successfully decrypts and doesn&amp;#39;t exhaust connection IDs is received. This issue can go undetected if clients are well-behaved. The former situation was observed in a real application, while the latter is only theoretical.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Quinn is a pure-Rust, async-compatible implementation of the IETF QUIC transport protocol. As of quinn-proto 0.11, it is possible for a server to `accept()`, `retry()`, `refuse()`, or `ignore()` an `Incoming` connection. However, calling `retry()` on an unvalidated connection exposes the server to a likely panic in the following situations:  1. Calling `refuse` or `ignore` on the resulting validated connection, if a duplicate initial packet is received. This issue can go undetected until a server&amp;#39;s `refuse()`/`ignore()` code path is exercised, such as to stop a denial of service attack. 2. Accepting when the initial packet for the resulting validated connection fails to decrypt or exhausts connection IDs, if a similar initial packet that successfully decrypts and doesn&amp;#39;t exhaust connection IDs is received. This issue can go undetected if clients are well-behaved. The former situation was observed in a real application, while the latter is only theoretical.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-45311</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-vr26-jcq5-fjj8 — Denial of service in quinn-proto when using `Endpoint::retry()`</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vr26-jcq5-fjj8</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: quinn-proto&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As of quinn-proto 0.11, it is possible for a server to `accept()`, `retry()`, `refuse()`, or `ignore()` an `Incoming` connection. However, calling `retry()` on an unvalidated connection exposes the server to a likely panic in the following situations:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Calling `refuse` or `ignore` on the resulting validated connection, if a duplicate initial packet is received
  - This issue can go undetected until a server&amp;#39;s `refuse()`/`ignore()` code path is exercised, such as to stop a denial of service attack.
- Accepting when the initial packet for the resulting validated connection fails to decrypt or exhausts connection IDs, if a similar initial packet that successfully decrypts and doesn&amp;#39;t exhaust connection IDs is received.
  - This issue can go undetected if clients are well-behaved.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The former situation was observed in a real application, while the latter is only theoretical.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Location of panic: https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/blob/bb02a12a8435a7732a1d762783eeacbb7e50418e/quinn-proto/src/endpoint.rs#L213&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
Denial of service for internet-facing server&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: quinn-proto&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As of quinn-proto 0.11, it is possible for a server to `accept()`, `retry()`, `refuse()`, or `ignore()` an `Incoming` connection. However, calling `retry()` on an unvalidated connection exposes the server to a likely panic in the following situations:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;- Calling `refuse` or `ignore` on the resulting validated connection, if a duplicate initial packet is received
  - This issue can go undetected until a server&amp;#39;s `refuse()`/`ignore()` code path is exercised, such as to stop a denial of service attack.
- Accepting when the initial packet for the resulting validated connection fails to decrypt or exhausts connection IDs, if a similar initial packet that successfully decrypts and doesn&amp;#39;t exhaust connection IDs is received.
  - This issue can go undetected if clients are well-behaved.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The former situation was observed in a real application, while the latter is only theoretical.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Location of panic: https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/blob/bb02a12a8435a7732a1d762783eeacbb7e50418e/quinn-proto/src/endpoint.rs#L213&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact
Denial of service for internet-facing server&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vr26-jcq5-fjj8</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RUSTSEC-2024-0373 — `Endpoint::retry()` calls can lead to panicking</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rustsec-2024-0373</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: quinn-proto&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 0.11.0, we overhauled the server-side `Endpoint` implementation to enable
more careful handling of incoming connection attempts. However, some of the
code paths that cleaned up state after connection attempts were processed
confused the initial destination connection ID with the destination connection
ID of a substantial package. This resulted in the internal `Endpoint` state
becoming inconsistent, which could then lead to a panic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/commit/e01609ccd8738bd438d86fa7185a0f85598cb58f&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks to [@finbear](https://github.com/finnbear) for reporting and investingating,
and to [@BiagoFesta](https://github.com/BiagoFesta) for coordinating.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; crates.io: quinn-proto&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In 0.11.0, we overhauled the server-side `Endpoint` implementation to enable
more careful handling of incoming connection attempts. However, some of the
code paths that cleaned up state after connection attempts were processed
confused the initial destination connection ID with the destination connection
ID of a substantial package. This resulted in the internal `Endpoint` state
becoming inconsistent, which could then lead to a panic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;https://github.com/quinn-rs/quinn/commit/e01609ccd8738bd438d86fa7185a0f85598cb58f&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Thanks to [@finbear](https://github.com/finnbear) for reporting and investingating,
and to [@BiagoFesta](https://github.com/BiagoFesta) for coordinating.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rustsec-2024-0373</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
