<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:08:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-6355</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-6355</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-6355</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-6355</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-40627</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-40627</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Fastapi OPA is an opensource fastapi middleware which includes auth flow. HTTP `OPTIONS` requests are always allowed by `OpaMiddleware`, even when they lack authentication, and are passed through directly to the application. `OpaMiddleware` allows all HTTP `OPTIONS` requests without evaluating it against any policy. If an application provides different responses to HTTP `OPTIONS` requests based on an entity existing (such as to indicate whether an entity is writable on a system level), an unauthenticated attacker could discover which entities exist within an application. This issue has been addressed in release version 2.0.1. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Fastapi OPA is an opensource fastapi middleware which includes auth flow. HTTP `OPTIONS` requests are always allowed by `OpaMiddleware`, even when they lack authentication, and are passed through directly to the application. `OpaMiddleware` allows all HTTP `OPTIONS` requests without evaluating it against any policy. If an application provides different responses to HTTP `OPTIONS` requests based on an entity existing (such as to indicate whether an entity is writable on a system level), an unauthenticated attacker could discover which entities exist within an application. This issue has been addressed in release version 2.0.1. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-40627</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-5f5c-8rvc-j8wf — OpaMiddleware does not filter HTTP OPTIONS requests</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-5f5c-8rvc-j8wf</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: fastapi-opa&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HTTP `OPTIONS` requests are always allowed by `OpaMiddleware`, even when they lack authentication, and are passed through directly to the application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The maintainer uncertain whether this should be classed as a &amp;#34;bug&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;security issue&amp;#34; – but is erring on the side of &amp;#34;security issue&amp;#34; as an application could reasonably assume OPA controls apply to *all* HTTP methods, and it bypasses more sophisticated policies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`OpaMiddleware` allows all HTTP `OPTIONS` requests without evaluating it against any policy:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;https://github.com/busykoala/fastapi-opa/blob/6dd6f8c87e908fe080784a74707f016f1422b58a/fastapi_opa/opa/opa_middleware.py#L79-L80&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an application provides different responses to HTTP `OPTIONS` requests based on an entity existing (such as to indicate whether an entity is writable on a system level), an unauthenticated attacker could discover which entities exist within an application (CWE-204).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### PoC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This toy application is based on the behaviour of an app[^1] which can use `fastapi-opa`. The app uses the `Allow` header of a HTTP `OPTIONS` to indicate whether an entity is writable on a &amp;#34;system&amp;#34; level, and returns HTTP 404 for unknown entities:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[^1]: an open source app, not written by me&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
# Run with: fastapi dev opa-poc.py --port 9999
from fastapi import FastAPI, Response, HTTPException
from fastapi_opa import OPAConfig, OPAMiddleware
from fastapi_opa.auth.auth_api_key import APIKeyAuthentication, APIKeyConfig&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# OPA doesn&amp;#39;t actuall…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: fastapi-opa&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HTTP `OPTIONS` requests are always allowed by `OpaMiddleware`, even when they lack authentication, and are passed through directly to the application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The maintainer uncertain whether this should be classed as a &amp;#34;bug&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;security issue&amp;#34; – but is erring on the side of &amp;#34;security issue&amp;#34; as an application could reasonably assume OPA controls apply to *all* HTTP methods, and it bypasses more sophisticated policies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`OpaMiddleware` allows all HTTP `OPTIONS` requests without evaluating it against any policy:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;https://github.com/busykoala/fastapi-opa/blob/6dd6f8c87e908fe080784a74707f016f1422b58a/fastapi_opa/opa/opa_middleware.py#L79-L80&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an application provides different responses to HTTP `OPTIONS` requests based on an entity existing (such as to indicate whether an entity is writable on a system level), an unauthenticated attacker could discover which entities exist within an application (CWE-204).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### PoC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This toy application is based on the behaviour of an app[^1] which can use `fastapi-opa`. The app uses the `Allow` header of a HTTP `OPTIONS` to indicate whether an entity is writable on a &amp;#34;system&amp;#34; level, and returns HTTP 404 for unknown entities:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[^1]: an open source app, not written by me&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
# Run with: fastapi dev opa-poc.py --port 9999
from fastapi import FastAPI, Response, HTTPException
from fastapi_opa import OPAConfig, OPAMiddleware
from fastapi_opa.auth.auth_api_key import APIKeyAuthentication, APIKeyConfig&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# OPA doesn&amp;#39;t actuall…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-5f5c-8rvc-j8wf</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PYSEC-2026-1361 — OpaMiddleware does not filter HTTP OPTIONS requests</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-1361</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: fastapi-opa&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HTTP `OPTIONS` requests are always allowed by `OpaMiddleware`, even when they lack authentication, and are passed through directly to the application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The maintainer uncertain whether this should be classed as a &amp;#34;bug&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;security issue&amp;#34; – but is erring on the side of &amp;#34;security issue&amp;#34; as an application could reasonably assume OPA controls apply to *all* HTTP methods, and it bypasses more sophisticated policies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`OpaMiddleware` allows all HTTP `OPTIONS` requests without evaluating it against any policy:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;https://github.com/busykoala/fastapi-opa/blob/6dd6f8c87e908fe080784a74707f016f1422b58a/fastapi_opa/opa/opa_middleware.py#L79-L80&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an application provides different responses to HTTP `OPTIONS` requests based on an entity existing (such as to indicate whether an entity is writable on a system level), an unauthenticated attacker could discover which entities exist within an application (CWE-204).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### PoC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This toy application is based on the behaviour of an app[^1] which can use `fastapi-opa`. The app uses the `Allow` header of a HTTP `OPTIONS` to indicate whether an entity is writable on a &amp;#34;system&amp;#34; level, and returns HTTP 404 for unknown entities:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[^1]: an open source app, not written by me&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
# Run with: fastapi dev opa-poc.py --port 9999
from fastapi import FastAPI, Response, HTTPException
from fastapi_opa import OPAConfig, OPAMiddleware
from fastapi_opa.auth.auth_api_key import APIKeyAuthentication, APIKeyConfig&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# OPA doesn&amp;#39;t actuall…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: fastapi-opa&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HTTP `OPTIONS` requests are always allowed by `OpaMiddleware`, even when they lack authentication, and are passed through directly to the application.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The maintainer uncertain whether this should be classed as a &amp;#34;bug&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;security issue&amp;#34; – but is erring on the side of &amp;#34;security issue&amp;#34; as an application could reasonably assume OPA controls apply to *all* HTTP methods, and it bypasses more sophisticated policies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`OpaMiddleware` allows all HTTP `OPTIONS` requests without evaluating it against any policy:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;https://github.com/busykoala/fastapi-opa/blob/6dd6f8c87e908fe080784a74707f016f1422b58a/fastapi_opa/opa/opa_middleware.py#L79-L80&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If an application provides different responses to HTTP `OPTIONS` requests based on an entity existing (such as to indicate whether an entity is writable on a system level), an unauthenticated attacker could discover which entities exist within an application (CWE-204).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### PoC&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This toy application is based on the behaviour of an app[^1] which can use `fastapi-opa`. The app uses the `Allow` header of a HTTP `OPTIONS` to indicate whether an entity is writable on a &amp;#34;system&amp;#34; level, and returns HTTP 404 for unknown entities:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[^1]: an open source app, not written by me&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;```python
# Run with: fastapi dev opa-poc.py --port 9999
from fastapi import FastAPI, Response, HTTPException
from fastapi_opa import OPAConfig, OPAMiddleware
from fastapi_opa.auth.auth_api_key import APIKeyAuthentication, APIKeyConfig&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;# OPA doesn&amp;#39;t actuall…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-1361</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2024-40627</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-40627</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: fastapi, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: fastapi, Ubuntu:25.10: fastapi, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: fastapi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fastapi OPA is an opensource fastapi middleware which includes auth flow. HTTP `OPTIONS` requests are always allowed by `OpaMiddleware`, even when they lack authentication, and are passed through directly to the application. `OpaMiddleware` allows all HTTP `OPTIONS` requests without evaluating it against any policy. If an application provides different responses to HTTP `OPTIONS` requests based on an entity existing (such as to indicate whether an entity is writable on a system level), an unauthenticated attacker could discover which entities exist within an application. This issue has been addressed in release version 2.0.1. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: fastapi, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: fastapi, Ubuntu:25.10: fastapi, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: fastapi&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fastapi OPA is an opensource fastapi middleware which includes auth flow. HTTP `OPTIONS` requests are always allowed by `OpaMiddleware`, even when they lack authentication, and are passed through directly to the application. `OpaMiddleware` allows all HTTP `OPTIONS` requests without evaluating it against any policy. If an application provides different responses to HTTP `OPTIONS` requests based on an entity existing (such as to indicate whether an entity is writable on a system level), an unauthenticated attacker could discover which entities exist within an application. This issue has been addressed in release version 2.0.1. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2024-40627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
