<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 14:16:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-136566</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-136566</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-136566</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-136566</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2024-34478</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-34478</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;btcd before 0.24.0 does not correctly implement the consensus rules outlined in BIP 68 and BIP 112, making it susceptible to consensus failures. Specifically, it uses the transaction version as a signed integer when it is supposed to be treated as unsigned. There can be a chain split and loss of funds.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;btcd before 0.24.0 does not correctly implement the consensus rules outlined in BIP 68 and BIP 112, making it susceptible to consensus failures. Specifically, it uses the transaction version as a signed integer when it is supposed to be treated as unsigned. There can be a chain split and loss of funds.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2024-34478</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-3jgf-r68h-xfqm — btcd susceptible to consensus failures</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3jgf-r68h-xfqm</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/btcsuite/btcd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btcd before 0.24.0 does not correctly implement the consensus rules outlined in BIP 68 and BIP 112, making it susceptible to consensus failures. Specifically, it uses the transaction version as a signed integer when it is supposed to be treated as unsigned. There can be a chain split and loss of funds.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/btcsuite/btcd&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;btcd before 0.24.0 does not correctly implement the consensus rules outlined in BIP 68 and BIP 112, making it susceptible to consensus failures. Specifically, it uses the transaction version as a signed integer when it is supposed to be treated as unsigned. There can be a chain split and loss of funds.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3jgf-r68h-xfqm</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
