<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2026 19:37:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-233869</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-233869</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-233869</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-233869</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2022-31170</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-31170</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8&amp;#39;s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn&amp;#39;t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;OpenZeppelin Contracts is a library for smart contract development. Versions 4.0.0 until 4.7.1 are vulnerable to ERC165Checker reverting instead of returning `false`. `ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8&amp;#39;s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn&amp;#39;t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1. The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting. The issue was patched in version 4.7.1.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2022-31170</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw — OpenZeppelin Contracts's ERC165Checker may revert instead of returning false</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: @openzeppelin/contracts, npm: @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8&amp;#39;s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn&amp;#39;t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue was patched in 4.7.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### References&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### For more information&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, or need assistance deploying the fix, email us at [security@openzeppelin.com](mailto:security@openzeppelin.com).&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; npm: @openzeppelin/contracts, npm: @openzeppelin/contracts-upgradeable&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`ERC165Checker.supportsInterface` is designed to always successfully return a boolean, and under no circumstance revert. However, an incorrect assumption about Solidity 0.8&amp;#39;s `abi.decode` allows some cases to revert, given a target contract that doesn&amp;#39;t implement EIP-165 as expected, specifically if it returns a value other than 0 or 1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The contracts that may be affected are those that use `ERC165Checker` to check for support for an interface and then handle the lack of support in a way other than reverting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue was patched in 4.7.1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### References&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/pull/3552&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;### For more information&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, or need assistance deploying the fix, email us at [security@openzeppelin.com](mailto:security@openzeppelin.com).&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-qh9x-gcfh-pcrw</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2022-31170</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2022-31170</link>
      <description>gsd-2022-31170</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2022-31170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
