<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 18:43:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-163609</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-163609</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-163609</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-163609</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2010-3192</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2010-3192</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2010-3192</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-388x-h72v-g58j</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-388x-h72v-g58j</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-388x-h72v-g58j</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>gsd-2010-3192</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2010-3192</link>
      <description>gsd-2010-3192</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/gsd-2010-3192</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2024:10792-1 — glibc-2.34-1.2 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2024:10792-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;glibc-2.34-1.2 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;glibc-2.34-1.2 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2024:10792-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2010-3192</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2010-3192</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: eglibc, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: glibc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: eglibc, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: glibc&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Certain run-time memory protection mechanisms in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) print argv[0] and backtrace information, which might allow context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from process memory by executing an incorrect program, as demonstrated by a setuid program that contains a stack-based buffer overflow error, related to the __fortify_fail function in debug/fortify_fail.c, and the __stack_chk_fail (aka stack protection) and __chk_fail (aka FORTIFY_SOURCE) implementations.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2010-3192</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
