<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 02:07:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-61727 — Improper application of excluded DNS name constraints when verifying wildcard names in crypto/x509</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2025-61727</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go standard library crypto/x509&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go standard library crypto/x509&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An excluded subdomain constraint in a certificate chain does not restrict the usage of wildcard SANs in the leaf certificate. For example a constraint that excludes the subdomain test.example.com does not prevent a leaf certificate from claiming the SAN *.example.com.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2025-61727</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-273p-m2cw-6833 — Rekor's COSE v0.0.1 entry type nil pointer dereference in Canonicalize via empty Message</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-273p-m2cw-6833</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/sigstore/rekor&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rekor’s cose v0.0.1 entry implementation can panic on attacker-controlled input when canonicalizing a proposed entry with an empty `spec.message`. `validate()` returns nil (success) when `message` is empty, leaving `sign1Msg` uninitialized, and `Canonicalize()` later dereferences `v.sign1Msg.Payload`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A malformed proposed entry of the `cose/v0.0.1` type can cause a panic on a thread within the Rekor process. The thread is recovered so the client receives a 500 error message and service still continues, so the availability impact of this is minimal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Upgrade to v1.5.0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Go: github.com/sigstore/rekor&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rekor’s cose v0.0.1 entry implementation can panic on attacker-controlled input when canonicalizing a proposed entry with an empty `spec.message`. `validate()` returns nil (success) when `message` is empty, leaving `sign1Msg` uninitialized, and `Canonicalize()` later dereferences `v.sign1Msg.Payload`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A malformed proposed entry of the `cose/v0.0.1` type can cause a panic on a thread within the Rekor process. The thread is recovered so the client receives a 500 error message and service still continues, so the availability impact of this is minimal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Patches&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Upgrade to v1.5.0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Workarounds&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;None&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-273p-m2cw-6833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
