<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 10:16:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2024-58096 — wifi: ath11k: add srng-&gt;lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-58096</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: ath11k: add srng-&amp;gt;lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng-&amp;gt;lock to protect srng data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(),
they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng-&amp;gt;lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur:
RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
Call Trace:
 ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k]
 ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k]
 ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k]
 __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0
 net_rx_action+0x198/0x320
 __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So add srng-&amp;gt;lock for them to avoid such warnings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inorder to fetch the srng-&amp;gt;lock, should change srng&amp;#39;s definition from
&amp;#39;void&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;struct hal_srng&amp;#39;. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent
one line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring
process functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30
Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: ath11k: add srng-&amp;gt;lock for ath11k_hal_srng_* in monitor mode&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ath11k_hal_srng_* should be used with srng-&amp;gt;lock to protect srng data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For ath11k_dp_rx_mon_dest_process() and ath11k_dp_full_mon_process_rx(),
they use ath11k_hal_srng_* for many times but never call srng-&amp;gt;lock.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So when running (full) monitor mode, warning will occur:
RIP: 0010:ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
Call Trace:
 ? ath11k_hal_srng_dst_peek+0x18/0x30 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_status+0xc45/0x1190 [ath11k]
 ? idr_alloc_u32+0x97/0xd0
 ath11k_dp_rx_process_mon_rings+0x32a/0x550 [ath11k]
 ath11k_dp_service_srng+0x289/0x5a0 [ath11k]
 ath11k_pcic_ext_grp_napi_poll+0x30/0xd0 [ath11k]
 __napi_poll+0x30/0x1f0
 net_rx_action+0x198/0x320
 __do_softirq+0xdd/0x319&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So add srng-&amp;gt;lock for them to avoid such warnings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inorder to fetch the srng-&amp;gt;lock, should change srng&amp;#39;s definition from
&amp;#39;void&amp;#39; to &amp;#39;struct hal_srng&amp;#39;. And initialize them elsewhere to prevent
one line of code from being too long. This is consistent with other ring
process functions, such as ath11k_dp_process_rx().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-03125-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-3.6510.30
Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.7.0.1-01744-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-58096</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
