<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 07:55:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2024-40998 — ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state-&gt;lock access in __ext4_fill_super()</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-40998</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state-&amp;gt;lock access in __ext4_fill_super()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the following concurrency we will access the uninitialized rs-&amp;gt;lock:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4_fill_super
  ext4_register_sysfs
   // sysfs registered msg_ratelimit_interval_ms
                             // Other processes modify rs-&amp;gt;interval to
                             // non-zero via msg_ratelimit_interval_ms
  ext4_orphan_cleanup
    ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, &amp;#34;Errors on filesystem, &amp;#34;
      __ext4_msg
        ___ratelimit(&amp;amp;(EXT4_SB(sb)-&amp;gt;s_msg_ratelimit_state)
          if (!rs-&amp;gt;interval)  // do nothing if interval is 0
            return 1;
          raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&amp;amp;rs-&amp;gt;lock, flags)
            raw_spin_trylock(lock)
              _raw_spin_trylock
                __raw_spin_trylock
                  spin_acquire(&amp;amp;lock-&amp;gt;dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_)
                    lock_acquire
                      __lock_acquire
                        register_lock_class
                          assign_lock_key
                            dump_stack();
  ratelimit_state_init(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_msg_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10);
    raw_spin_lock_init(&amp;amp;rs-&amp;gt;lock);
    // init rs-&amp;gt;lock here&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and get the following dump_stack:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;=========================================================
INFO: trying to register non-static key.
The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
you didn&amp;#39;t initialize this object before use?
turning off the locking correctness va…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4: fix uninitialized ratelimit_state-&amp;gt;lock access in __ext4_fill_super()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the following concurrency we will access the uninitialized rs-&amp;gt;lock:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4_fill_super
  ext4_register_sysfs
   // sysfs registered msg_ratelimit_interval_ms
                             // Other processes modify rs-&amp;gt;interval to
                             // non-zero via msg_ratelimit_interval_ms
  ext4_orphan_cleanup
    ext4_msg(sb, KERN_INFO, &amp;#34;Errors on filesystem, &amp;#34;
      __ext4_msg
        ___ratelimit(&amp;amp;(EXT4_SB(sb)-&amp;gt;s_msg_ratelimit_state)
          if (!rs-&amp;gt;interval)  // do nothing if interval is 0
            return 1;
          raw_spin_trylock_irqsave(&amp;amp;rs-&amp;gt;lock, flags)
            raw_spin_trylock(lock)
              _raw_spin_trylock
                __raw_spin_trylock
                  spin_acquire(&amp;amp;lock-&amp;gt;dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_)
                    lock_acquire
                      __lock_acquire
                        register_lock_class
                          assign_lock_key
                            dump_stack();
  ratelimit_state_init(&amp;amp;sbi-&amp;gt;s_msg_ratelimit_state, 5 * HZ, 10);
    raw_spin_lock_init(&amp;amp;rs-&amp;gt;lock);
    // init rs-&amp;gt;lock here&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;and get the following dump_stack:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;=========================================================
INFO: trying to register non-static key.
The code is fine but needs lockdep annotation, or maybe
you didn&amp;#39;t initialize this object before use?
turning off the locking correctness va…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-40998</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
