<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 13:11:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-38537 — net: phy: Don't register LEDs for genphy</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2025-38537</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: phy: Don&amp;#39;t register LEDs for genphy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a PHY has no driver, the genphy driver is probed/removed directly in
phy_attach/detach. If the PHY&amp;#39;s ofnode has an &amp;#34;leds&amp;#34; subnode, then the
LEDs will be (un)registered when probing/removing the genphy driver.
This could occur if the leds are for a non-generic driver that isn&amp;#39;t
loaded for whatever reason. Synchronously removing the PHY device in
phy_detach leads to the following deadlock:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rtnl_lock()
ndo_close()
    ...
    phy_detach()
        phy_remove()
            phy_leds_unregister()
                led_classdev_unregister()
                    led_trigger_set()
                        netdev_trigger_deactivate()
                            unregister_netdevice_notifier()
                                rtnl_lock()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a corresponding deadlock on the open/register side of things
(and that one is reported by lockdep), but it requires a race while this
one is deterministic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Generic PHYs do not support LEDs anyway, so don&amp;#39;t bother registering
them.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: phy: Don&amp;#39;t register LEDs for genphy&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a PHY has no driver, the genphy driver is probed/removed directly in
phy_attach/detach. If the PHY&amp;#39;s ofnode has an &amp;#34;leds&amp;#34; subnode, then the
LEDs will be (un)registered when probing/removing the genphy driver.
This could occur if the leds are for a non-generic driver that isn&amp;#39;t
loaded for whatever reason. Synchronously removing the PHY device in
phy_detach leads to the following deadlock:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;rtnl_lock()
ndo_close()
    ...
    phy_detach()
        phy_remove()
            phy_leds_unregister()
                led_classdev_unregister()
                    led_trigger_set()
                        netdev_trigger_deactivate()
                            unregister_netdevice_notifier()
                                rtnl_lock()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a corresponding deadlock on the open/register side of things
(and that one is reported by lockdep), but it requires a race while this
one is deterministic.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Generic PHYs do not support LEDs anyway, so don&amp;#39;t bother registering
them.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2025-38537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
