<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2026 16:56:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-37805 — sound/virtio: Fix cancel_sync warnings on uninitialized work_structs</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2025-37805</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sound/virtio: Fix cancel_sync warnings on uninitialized work_structs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Betty reported hitting the following warning:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[    8.709131][  T221] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 221 at kernel/workqueue.c:4182
...
[    8.713282][  T221] Call trace:
[    8.713365][  T221]  __flush_work+0x8d0/0x914
[    8.713468][  T221]  __cancel_work_sync+0xac/0xfc
[    8.713570][  T221]  cancel_work_sync+0x24/0x34
[    8.713667][  T221]  virtsnd_remove+0xa8/0xf8 [virtio_snd ab15f34d0dd772f6d11327e08a81d46dc9c36276]
[    8.713868][  T221]  virtsnd_probe+0x48c/0x664 [virtio_snd ab15f34d0dd772f6d11327e08a81d46dc9c36276]
[    8.714035][  T221]  virtio_dev_probe+0x28c/0x390
[    8.714139][  T221]  really_probe+0x1bc/0x4c8
...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems we&amp;#39;re hitting the error path in virtsnd_probe(), which
triggers a virtsnd_remove() which iterates over the substreams
calling cancel_work_sync() on the elapsed_period work_struct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Looking at the code, from earlier in:
virtsnd_probe()-&amp;gt;virtsnd_build_devs()-&amp;gt;virtsnd_pcm_parse_cfg()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We set snd-&amp;gt;nsubstreams, allocate the snd-&amp;gt;substreams, and if
we then hit an error on the info allocation or something in
virtsnd_ctl_query_info() fails, we will exit without having
initialized the elapsed_period work_struct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When that error path unwinds we then call virtsnd_remove()
which as long as the substreams array is allocated, will iterate
through calling cancel_work_sync() on the uninitialized work
struct hitting this warning.…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sound/virtio: Fix cancel_sync warnings on uninitialized work_structs&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Betty reported hitting the following warning:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;[    8.709131][  T221] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 221 at kernel/workqueue.c:4182
...
[    8.713282][  T221] Call trace:
[    8.713365][  T221]  __flush_work+0x8d0/0x914
[    8.713468][  T221]  __cancel_work_sync+0xac/0xfc
[    8.713570][  T221]  cancel_work_sync+0x24/0x34
[    8.713667][  T221]  virtsnd_remove+0xa8/0xf8 [virtio_snd ab15f34d0dd772f6d11327e08a81d46dc9c36276]
[    8.713868][  T221]  virtsnd_probe+0x48c/0x664 [virtio_snd ab15f34d0dd772f6d11327e08a81d46dc9c36276]
[    8.714035][  T221]  virtio_dev_probe+0x28c/0x390
[    8.714139][  T221]  really_probe+0x1bc/0x4c8
...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It seems we&amp;#39;re hitting the error path in virtsnd_probe(), which
triggers a virtsnd_remove() which iterates over the substreams
calling cancel_work_sync() on the elapsed_period work_struct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Looking at the code, from earlier in:
virtsnd_probe()-&amp;gt;virtsnd_build_devs()-&amp;gt;virtsnd_pcm_parse_cfg()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We set snd-&amp;gt;nsubstreams, allocate the snd-&amp;gt;substreams, and if
we then hit an error on the info allocation or something in
virtsnd_ctl_query_info() fails, we will exit without having
initialized the elapsed_period work_struct.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When that error path unwinds we then call virtsnd_remove()
which as long as the substreams array is allocated, will iterate
through calling cancel_work_sync() on the uninitialized work
struct hitting this warning.…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2025-37805</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
