<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 13:16:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2024-39276 — ext4: fix mb_cache_entry's e_refcnt leak in ext4_xattr_block_cache_find()</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-39276</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4: fix mb_cache_entry&amp;#39;s e_refcnt leak in ext4_xattr_block_cache_find()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Syzbot reports a warning as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;============================================
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5075 at fs/mbcache.c:419 mb_cache_destroy+0x224/0x290
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 5075 Comm: syz-executor199 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-gb947cc5bf6d7
RIP: 0010:mb_cache_destroy+0x224/0x290 fs/mbcache.c:419
Call Trace:
 &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 ext4_put_super+0x6d4/0xcd0 fs/ext4/super.c:1375
 generic_shutdown_super+0x136/0x2d0 fs/super.c:641
 kill_block_super+0x44/0x90 fs/super.c:1675
 ext4_kill_sb+0x68/0xa0 fs/ext4/super.c:7327
[...]
============================================&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is because when finding an entry in ext4_xattr_block_cache_find(), if
ext4_sb_bread() returns -ENOMEM, the ce&amp;#39;s e_refcnt, which has already grown
in the __entry_find(), won&amp;#39;t be put away, and eventually trigger the above
issue in mb_cache_destroy() due to reference count leakage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So call mb_cache_entry_put() on the -ENOMEM error branch as a quick fix.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4: fix mb_cache_entry&amp;#39;s e_refcnt leak in ext4_xattr_block_cache_find()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Syzbot reports a warning as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;============================================
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 5075 at fs/mbcache.c:419 mb_cache_destroy+0x224/0x290
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 PID: 5075 Comm: syz-executor199 Not tainted 6.9.0-rc6-gb947cc5bf6d7
RIP: 0010:mb_cache_destroy+0x224/0x290 fs/mbcache.c:419
Call Trace:
 &amp;lt;TASK&amp;gt;
 ext4_put_super+0x6d4/0xcd0 fs/ext4/super.c:1375
 generic_shutdown_super+0x136/0x2d0 fs/super.c:641
 kill_block_super+0x44/0x90 fs/super.c:1675
 ext4_kill_sb+0x68/0xa0 fs/ext4/super.c:7327
[...]
============================================&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is because when finding an entry in ext4_xattr_block_cache_find(), if
ext4_sb_bread() returns -ENOMEM, the ce&amp;#39;s e_refcnt, which has already grown
in the __entry_find(), won&amp;#39;t be put away, and eventually trigger the above
issue in mb_cache_destroy() due to reference count leakage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So call mb_cache_entry_put() on the -ENOMEM error branch as a quick fix.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2024-39276</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
