<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 15:21:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2022-48731 — mm/kmemleak: avoid scanning potential huge holes</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2022-48731</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/kmemleak: avoid scanning potential huge holes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When using devm_request_free_mem_region() and devm_memremap_pages() to
add ZONE_DEVICE memory, if requested free mem region&amp;#39;s end pfn were
huge(e.g., 0x400000000), the node_end_pfn() will be also huge (see
move_pfn_range_to_zone()).  Thus it creates a huge hole between
node_start_pfn() and node_end_pfn().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We found on some AMD APUs, amdkfd requested such a free mem region and
created a huge hole.  In such a case, following code snippet was just
doing busy test_bit() looping on the huge hole.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn &amp;lt; end_pfn; pfn++) {
	struct page *page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
		if (!page)
			continue;
	...
  }&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So we got a soft lockup:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for 26s! [bash:1221]
  CPU: 6 PID: 1221 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.15.0-custom #1
  RIP: 0010:pfn_to_online_page+0x5/0xd0
  Call Trace:
    ? kmemleak_scan+0x16a/0x440
    kmemleak_write+0x306/0x3a0
    ? common_file_perm+0x72/0x170
    full_proxy_write+0x5c/0x90
    vfs_write+0xb9/0x260
    ksys_write+0x67/0xe0
    __x64_sys_write+0x1a/0x20
    do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I did some tests with the patch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) amdgpu module unloaded&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;before the patch:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;real    0m0.976s
  user    0m0.000s
  sys     0m0.968s&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;after the patch:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;real    0m0.981s
  user    0m0.000s
  sys     0m0.973s&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) amdgpu module loaded&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;before the patch:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;real…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/kmemleak: avoid scanning potential huge holes&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When using devm_request_free_mem_region() and devm_memremap_pages() to
add ZONE_DEVICE memory, if requested free mem region&amp;#39;s end pfn were
huge(e.g., 0x400000000), the node_end_pfn() will be also huge (see
move_pfn_range_to_zone()).  Thus it creates a huge hole between
node_start_pfn() and node_end_pfn().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We found on some AMD APUs, amdkfd requested such a free mem region and
created a huge hole.  In such a case, following code snippet was just
doing busy test_bit() looping on the huge hole.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn &amp;lt; end_pfn; pfn++) {
	struct page *page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn);
		if (!page)
			continue;
	...
  }&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So we got a soft lockup:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#6 stuck for 26s! [bash:1221]
  CPU: 6 PID: 1221 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.15.0-custom #1
  RIP: 0010:pfn_to_online_page+0x5/0xd0
  Call Trace:
    ? kmemleak_scan+0x16a/0x440
    kmemleak_write+0x306/0x3a0
    ? common_file_perm+0x72/0x170
    full_proxy_write+0x5c/0x90
    vfs_write+0xb9/0x260
    ksys_write+0x67/0xe0
    __x64_sys_write+0x1a/0x20
    do_syscall_64+0x3b/0xc0
    entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I did some tests with the patch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(1) amdgpu module unloaded&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;before the patch:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;real    0m0.976s
  user    0m0.000s
  sys     0m0.968s&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;after the patch:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;real    0m0.981s
  user    0m0.000s
  sys     0m0.973s&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) amdgpu module loaded&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;before the patch:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;real…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2022-48731</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
