<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:27:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>CVE-2025-38527 — smb: client: fix use-after-free in cifs_oplock_break</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2025-38527</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;smb: client: fix use-after-free in cifs_oplock_break&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A race condition can occur in cifs_oplock_break() leading to a
use-after-free of the cinode structure when unmounting:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cifs_oplock_break()
    _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile)
      cifsFileInfo_put_final()
        cifs_sb_deactive()
          [last ref, start releasing sb]
            kill_sb()
              kill_anon_super()
                generic_shutdown_super()
                  evict_inodes()
                    dispose_list()
                      evict()
                        destroy_inode()
                          call_rcu(&amp;amp;inode-&amp;gt;i_rcu, i_callback)
    spin_lock(&amp;amp;cinode-&amp;gt;open_file_lock)  &amp;lt;- OK
                            [later] i_callback()
                              cifs_free_inode()
                                kmem_cache_free(cinode)
    spin_unlock(&amp;amp;cinode-&amp;gt;open_file_lock)  &amp;lt;- UAF
    cifs_done_oplock_break(cinode)       &amp;lt;- UAF&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue occurs when umount has already released its reference to the
superblock. When _cifsFileInfo_put() calls cifs_sb_deactive(), this
releases the last reference, triggering the immediate cleanup of all
inodes under RCU. However, cifs_oplock_break() continues to access the
cinode after this point, resulting in use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by holding an extra reference to the superblock during the
entire oplock break operation. This ensures that the superblock and
its inodes remain valid until the oplock bre…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Linux&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;smb: client: fix use-after-free in cifs_oplock_break&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A race condition can occur in cifs_oplock_break() leading to a
use-after-free of the cinode structure when unmounting:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;cifs_oplock_break()
    _cifsFileInfo_put(cfile)
      cifsFileInfo_put_final()
        cifs_sb_deactive()
          [last ref, start releasing sb]
            kill_sb()
              kill_anon_super()
                generic_shutdown_super()
                  evict_inodes()
                    dispose_list()
                      evict()
                        destroy_inode()
                          call_rcu(&amp;amp;inode-&amp;gt;i_rcu, i_callback)
    spin_lock(&amp;amp;cinode-&amp;gt;open_file_lock)  &amp;lt;- OK
                            [later] i_callback()
                              cifs_free_inode()
                                kmem_cache_free(cinode)
    spin_unlock(&amp;amp;cinode-&amp;gt;open_file_lock)  &amp;lt;- UAF
    cifs_done_oplock_break(cinode)       &amp;lt;- UAF&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The issue occurs when umount has already released its reference to the
superblock. When _cifsFileInfo_put() calls cifs_sb_deactive(), this
releases the last reference, triggering the immediate cleanup of all
inodes under RCU. However, cifs_oplock_break() continues to access the
cinode after this point, resulting in use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by holding an extra reference to the superblock during the
entire oplock break operation. This ensures that the superblock and
its inodes remain valid until the oplock bre…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/cve-2025-38527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
