<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 14:50:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-89759</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-89759</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-89759</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1253 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1253</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1253</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1253</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-367044</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-367044</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-367044</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-367044</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-89759</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-89759</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task stacks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task&amp;#34;, v3.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kmemleak_scan() scans every task stack under one rcu_read_lock() with no
reschedule point, which can trip the soft lockup watchdog on hosts with
very many threads.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That prints the following message, depending on the workload+host
configuration:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]
       scan_block
       kmemleak_scan
       kmemleak_scan_thread
       kthread&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch 1 walks the tasks with find_ge_pid() so the scan reschedules between
tasks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patches 2-3 let the scan loops stop early once a scan is interrupted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 3):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kmemleak_scan() walks every thread and scans its kernel stack under a
single rcu_read_lock() with no reschedule point.  On a host with very many
threads -- amplified by KASAN/lockdep in debug builds -- this loop can hog
a CPU long enough to trip the soft lockup watchdog:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]
   scan_block
   kmemleak_scan
   kmemleak_scan_thread
   kthread&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A cond_resched() cannot be added directly: the loop runs inside an RCU
read-side critical section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Walk the tasks one PID at a time with find_ge_pid(), taking the RCU read
lock only to look up and pin each task.  The stack is then scanned with no
lock held, so cond_resched() runs between tasks and the scan stops ea…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task stacks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task&amp;#34;, v3.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kmemleak_scan() scans every task stack under one rcu_read_lock() with no
reschedule point, which can trip the soft lockup watchdog on hosts with
very many threads.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That prints the following message, depending on the workload+host
configuration:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]
       scan_block
       kmemleak_scan
       kmemleak_scan_thread
       kthread&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch 1 walks the tasks with find_ge_pid() so the scan reschedules between
tasks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patches 2-3 let the scan loops stop early once a scan is interrupted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 3):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kmemleak_scan() walks every thread and scans its kernel stack under a
single rcu_read_lock() with no reschedule point.  On a host with very many
threads -- amplified by KASAN/lockdep in debug builds -- this loop can hog
a CPU long enough to trip the soft lockup watchdog:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]
   scan_block
   kmemleak_scan
   kmemleak_scan_thread
   kthread&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A cond_resched() cannot be added directly: the loop runs inside an RCU
read-side critical section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Walk the tasks one PID at a time with find_ge_pid(), taking the RCU read
lock only to look up and pin each task.  The stack is then scanned with no
lock held, so cond_resched() runs between tasks and the scan stops ea…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-89759</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-cr6x-j7pj-fq6g</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-cr6x-j7pj-fq6g</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task stacks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task&amp;#34;, v3.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kmemleak_scan() scans every task stack under one rcu_read_lock() with no
reschedule point, which can trip the soft lockup watchdog on hosts with
very many threads.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That prints the following message, depending on the workload+host
configuration:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]
       scan_block
       kmemleak_scan
       kmemleak_scan_thread
       kthread&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch 1 walks the tasks with find_ge_pid() so the scan reschedules between
tasks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patches 2-3 let the scan loops stop early once a scan is interrupted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 3):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kmemleak_scan() walks every thread and scans its kernel stack under a
single rcu_read_lock() with no reschedule point.  On a host with very many
threads -- amplified by KASAN/lockdep in debug builds -- this loop can hog
a CPU long enough to trip the soft lockup watchdog:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]
   scan_block
   kmemleak_scan
   kmemleak_scan_thread
   kthread&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A cond_resched() cannot be added directly: the loop runs inside an RCU
read-side critical section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Walk the tasks one PID at a time with find_ge_pid(), taking the RCU read
lock only to look up and pin each task.  The stack is then scanned with no
lock held, so cond_resched() runs between tasks and the scan stops ea…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task stacks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task&amp;#34;, v3.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kmemleak_scan() scans every task stack under one rcu_read_lock() with no
reschedule point, which can trip the soft lockup watchdog on hosts with
very many threads.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That prints the following message, depending on the workload+host
configuration:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]
       scan_block
       kmemleak_scan
       kmemleak_scan_thread
       kthread&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch 1 walks the tasks with find_ge_pid() so the scan reschedules between
tasks&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patches 2-3 let the scan loops stop early once a scan is interrupted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 3):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;kmemleak_scan() walks every thread and scans its kernel stack under a
single rcu_read_lock() with no reschedule point.  On a host with very many
threads -- amplified by KASAN/lockdep in debug builds -- this loop can hog
a CPU long enough to trip the soft lockup watchdog:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]
   scan_block
   kmemleak_scan
   kmemleak_scan_thread
   kthread&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A cond_resched() cannot be added directly: the loop runs inside an RCU
read-side critical section.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Walk the tasks one PID at a time with find_ge_pid(), taking the RCU read
lock only to look up and pin each task.  The stack is then scanned with no
lock held, so cond_resched() runs between tasks and the scan stops ea…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-cr6x-j7pj-fq6g</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-89759 — mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task stacks</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-89759</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-89759</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-89759</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11880-1 — kernel-devel-7.2.7-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11880-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.2.7-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.2.7-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11880-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-89759</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-89759</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 193 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task stacks Patch series &amp;#34;mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task&amp;#34;, v3. kmemleak_scan() scans every task stack under one rcu_read_lock() with no reschedule point, which can trip the soft lockup watchdog on hosts with very many threads. That prints the following message, depending on the workload+host configuration:       watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]        scan_block        kmemleak_scan        kmemleak_scan_thread        kthread Patch 1 walks the tasks with find_ge_pid() so the scan reschedules between tasks Patches 2-3 let the scan loops stop early once a scan is interrupted. This patch (of 3): kmemleak_scan() walks every thread and scans its kernel stack under a single rcu_read_lock() with no reschedule point.  On a host with very many threads -- amplified by KASAN/lockdep in debug builds -- this loop can hog a CPU long enough to trip the soft lockup watchdog:   watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]    scan_block    kmemleak_scan    kmemleak_scan_thread    kthread A cond_resched() cannot be added directly: the loop runs inside an RCU read-side critical section. Walk the tasks one PID at a time with find_ge_pid(), taking the RCU read lock only to look up and pin each task.  The stack is then scanned with no lock held, so cond_resched() runs between tasks and the scan stops early on scan_s…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 193 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task stacks Patch series &amp;#34;mm/kmemleak: avoid soft lockup when scanning task&amp;#34;, v3. kmemleak_scan() scans every task stack under one rcu_read_lock() with no reschedule point, which can trip the soft lockup watchdog on hosts with very many threads. That prints the following message, depending on the workload+host configuration:       watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]        scan_block        kmemleak_scan        kmemleak_scan_thread        kthread Patch 1 walks the tasks with find_ge_pid() so the scan reschedules between tasks Patches 2-3 let the scan loops stop early once a scan is interrupted. This patch (of 3): kmemleak_scan() walks every thread and scans its kernel stack under a single rcu_read_lock() with no reschedule point.  On a host with very many threads -- amplified by KASAN/lockdep in debug builds -- this loop can hog a CPU long enough to trip the soft lockup watchdog:   watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#35 stuck for 22s! [kmemleak:537]    scan_block    kmemleak_scan    kmemleak_scan_thread    kthread A cond_resched() cannot be added directly: the loop runs inside an RCU read-side critical section. Walk the tasks one PID at a time with find_ge_pid(), taking the RCU read lock only to look up and pin each task.  The stack is then scanned with no lock held, so cond_resched() runs between tasks and the scan stops early on scan_s…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-89759</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-3321 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3321</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten oder den Systemzustand zu manipulieren, Denial-of-Service-Zustände herbeizuführen oder andere, nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, Daten oder den Systemzustand zu manipulieren, Denial-of-Service-Zustände herbeizuführen oder andere, nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3321</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
