https://cve.radiocsirt.org Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Fri, 02 Oct 2026 23:29:13 +0000 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-10477 bdu:2026-10477 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-10477 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-django-2026-8404 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Bitnami: django</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` in Django does not match `Cache-Control` response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached because their `Cache-Control` directives used uppercase or mixed-case values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Ahmed Badawe for reporting this issue.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Bitnami: django</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` in Django does not match `Cache-Control` response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached because their `Cache-Control` directives used uppercase or mixed-case values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Ahmed Badawe for reporting this issue.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bit-django-2026-8404 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-324405 EUVD-2026-324405 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-324405 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-8404 <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` in Django does not match `Cache-Control` response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached because their `Cache-Control` directives used uppercase or mixed-case values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Ahmed Badawe for reporting this issue.</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` in Django does not match `Cache-Control` response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached because their `Cache-Control` directives used uppercase or mixed-case values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Ahmed Badawe for reporting this issue.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-8404 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8cjm-8mp7-r2xf <p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: django</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` in Django does not match `Cache-Control` response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached because their `Cache-Control` directives used uppercase or mixed-case values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Ahmed Badawe for reporting this issue.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: django</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` in Django does not match `Cache-Control` response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached because their `Cache-Control` directives used uppercase or mixed-case values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Ahmed Badawe for reporting this issue.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8cjm-8mp7-r2xf https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2659 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: python-django</p> <p>A high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design. Security Fix(es):</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` in Django does not add `Authorization` to the `Vary` response header for requests bearing that header without `Cache-Control: public`, which allows remote attackers to read private cached responses via unauthenticated requests to the same URL. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Shai Berger for reporting this issue.(CVE-2026-35193)</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.utils.cache.has_vary_header()` in Django does not strip leading or trailing whitespace from `Vary` response header values before comparison, which allows remote attackers to read cached responses via requests to URLs whose responses contain whitespace-padded Vary header values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Navid Rezazadeh for reporting this issue.(CVE-2026-48587)</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.6 and 5.2 before 5.2.15. `django.http.HttpRequest.get_signed_cookie` in Django uses a non-injective salt derivation (concatenating the cookie name and salt argument), which allows a remote attacker to use a c…</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: python-django</p> <p>A high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design. Security Fix(es):</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` in Django does not add `Authorization` to the `Vary` response header for requests bearing that header without `Cache-Control: public`, which allows remote attackers to read private cached responses via unauthenticated requests to the same URL. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Shai Berger for reporting this issue.(CVE-2026-35193)</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.utils.cache.has_vary_header()` in Django does not strip leading or trailing whitespace from `Vary` response header values before comparison, which allows remote attackers to read cached responses via requests to URLs whose responses contain whitespace-padded Vary header values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Navid Rezazadeh for reporting this issue.(CVE-2026-48587)</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 6.0 before 6.0.6 and 5.2 before 5.2.15. `django.http.HttpRequest.get_signed_cookie` in Django uses a non-injective salt derivation (concatenating the cookie name and salt argument), which allows a remote attacker to use a c…</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-2659 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10989-1 <p>python311-Django4-4.2.30-3.1 on GA media</p> <p>python311-Django4-4.2.30-3.1 on GA media</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:10989-1 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-201 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: django</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` in Django does not match `Cache-Control` response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached because their `Cache-Control` directives used uppercase or mixed-case values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Ahmed Badawe for reporting this issue.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> PyPI: django</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` in Django does not match `Cache-Control` response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached because their `Cache-Control` directives used uppercase or mixed-case values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Ahmed Badawe for reporting this issue.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-201 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:2318-1 <p>Security update for python-Django</p> <p>Security update for python-Django</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:2318-1 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-8404 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:25.10: python-django, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: python-django</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` in Django does not match `Cache-Control` response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached because their `Cache-Control` directives used uppercase or mixed-case values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Ahmed Badawe for reporting this issue.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: python-django, Ubuntu:25.10: python-django, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: python-django</p> <p>An issue was discovered in Django 5.2 before 5.2.15 and 6.0 before 6.0.6. `django.middleware.cache.UpdateCacheMiddleware` in Django does not match `Cache-Control` response directives case-insensitively, which allows remote attackers to read responses that were incorrectly cached because their `Cache-Control` directives used uppercase or mixed-case values. Earlier, unsupported Django series (such as 5.0.x, 4.1.x, and 3.2.x) were not evaluated and may also be affected. Django would like to thank Ahmed Badawe for reporting this issue.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-8404 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1807 <p>Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Django ausnutzen, um Informationen offenzulegen.</p> <p>Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Django ausnutzen, um Informationen offenzulegen.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-1807