<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 19:32:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-80793</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-80793</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-80793</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1163 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1163</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1163</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1163</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-363811</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-363811</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-363811</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-363811</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-80793</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-80793</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ipv4: reject undersized MTUs in ip_do_fragment()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ip_do_fragment() subtracts the IPv4 header length from the effective
MTU and passes the resulting payload MTU to ip_frag_next().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the effective MTU is smaller than hlen + 8, ip_frag_next() rounds
the fragment payload length down to zero. The fragmentation state then
never makes forward progress: state-&amp;gt;left, state-&amp;gt;ptr and state-&amp;gt;offset
stay unchanged while ip_do_fragment() keeps allocating and transmitting
header-only fragments until the softlockup detector fires.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is reproducible with a route installed using &amp;#34;mtu lock 20&amp;#34;, but it
is also reproducible without route MTU lock, for example by forwarding a
packet to a device whose MTU is 20.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix it in ip_do_fragment() by rejecting mtu &amp;lt; hlen + 8 with -EMSGSIZE,
matching the existing IPv6 fragmentation check.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ipv4: reject undersized MTUs in ip_do_fragment()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ip_do_fragment() subtracts the IPv4 header length from the effective
MTU and passes the resulting payload MTU to ip_frag_next().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the effective MTU is smaller than hlen + 8, ip_frag_next() rounds
the fragment payload length down to zero. The fragmentation state then
never makes forward progress: state-&amp;gt;left, state-&amp;gt;ptr and state-&amp;gt;offset
stay unchanged while ip_do_fragment() keeps allocating and transmitting
header-only fragments until the softlockup detector fires.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is reproducible with a route installed using &amp;#34;mtu lock 20&amp;#34;, but it
is also reproducible without route MTU lock, for example by forwarding a
packet to a device whose MTU is 20.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix it in ip_do_fragment() by rejecting mtu &amp;lt; hlen + 8 with -EMSGSIZE,
matching the existing IPv6 fragmentation check.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-80793</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-vc8f-29mh-24xv</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vc8f-29mh-24xv</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ipv4: reject undersized MTUs in ip_do_fragment()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ip_do_fragment() subtracts the IPv4 header length from the effective
MTU and passes the resulting payload MTU to ip_frag_next().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the effective MTU is smaller than hlen + 8, ip_frag_next() rounds
the fragment payload length down to zero. The fragmentation state then
never makes forward progress: state-&amp;gt;left, state-&amp;gt;ptr and state-&amp;gt;offset
stay unchanged while ip_do_fragment() keeps allocating and transmitting
header-only fragments until the softlockup detector fires.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is reproducible with a route installed using &amp;#34;mtu lock 20&amp;#34;, but it
is also reproducible without route MTU lock, for example by forwarding a
packet to a device whose MTU is 20.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix it in ip_do_fragment() by rejecting mtu &amp;lt; hlen + 8 with -EMSGSIZE,
matching the existing IPv6 fragmentation check.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ipv4: reject undersized MTUs in ip_do_fragment()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ip_do_fragment() subtracts the IPv4 header length from the effective
MTU and passes the resulting payload MTU to ip_frag_next().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the effective MTU is smaller than hlen + 8, ip_frag_next() rounds
the fragment payload length down to zero. The fragmentation state then
never makes forward progress: state-&amp;gt;left, state-&amp;gt;ptr and state-&amp;gt;offset
stay unchanged while ip_do_fragment() keeps allocating and transmitting
header-only fragments until the softlockup detector fires.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is reproducible with a route installed using &amp;#34;mtu lock 20&amp;#34;, but it
is also reproducible without route MTU lock, for example by forwarding a
packet to a device whose MTU is 20.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix it in ip_do_fragment() by rejecting mtu &amp;lt; hlen + 8 with -EMSGSIZE,
matching the existing IPv6 fragmentation check.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-vc8f-29mh-24xv</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-80793 — ipv4: reject undersized MTUs in ip_do_fragment()</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-80793</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-80793</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-80793</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11773-1 — kernel-devel-7.2.5-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11773-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.2.5-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.2.5-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11773-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-80793</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-80793</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4: reject undersized MTUs in ip_do_fragment() ip_do_fragment() subtracts the IPv4 header length from the effective MTU and passes the resulting payload MTU to ip_frag_next(). If the effective MTU is smaller than hlen + 8, ip_frag_next() rounds the fragment payload length down to zero. The fragmentation state then never makes forward progress: state-&amp;gt;left, state-&amp;gt;ptr and state-&amp;gt;offset stay unchanged while ip_do_fragment() keeps allocating and transmitting header-only fragments until the softlockup detector fires. This is reproducible with a route installed using &amp;#34;mtu lock 20&amp;#34;, but it is also reproducible without route MTU lock, for example by forwarding a packet to a device whose MTU is 20. Fix it in ip_do_fragment() by rejecting mtu &amp;lt; hlen + 8 with -EMSGSIZE, matching the existing IPv6 fragmentation check.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ipv4: reject undersized MTUs in ip_do_fragment() ip_do_fragment() subtracts the IPv4 header length from the effective MTU and passes the resulting payload MTU to ip_frag_next(). If the effective MTU is smaller than hlen + 8, ip_frag_next() rounds the fragment payload length down to zero. The fragmentation state then never makes forward progress: state-&amp;gt;left, state-&amp;gt;ptr and state-&amp;gt;offset stay unchanged while ip_do_fragment() keeps allocating and transmitting header-only fragments until the softlockup detector fires. This is reproducible with a route installed using &amp;#34;mtu lock 20&amp;#34;, but it is also reproducible without route MTU lock, for example by forwarding a packet to a device whose MTU is 20. Fix it in ip_do_fragment() by rejecting mtu &amp;lt; hlen + 8 with -EMSGSIZE, matching the existing IPv6 fragmentation check.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-80793</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-3211 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3211</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Speicherfehler und Kernel-Abstürze beziehungsweise Denial-of-Service-Zustände auszulösen, Speicher außerhalb vorgesehener Grenzen auszulesen sowie in einzelnen Fällen weitere Sicherheitsauswirkungen zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter, anonymer Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Speicherfehler und Kernel-Abstürze beziehungsweise Denial-of-Service-Zustände auszulösen, Speicher außerhalb vorgesehener Grenzen auszulesen sowie in einzelnen Fällen weitere Sicherheitsauswirkungen zu verursachen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3211</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
