<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 06:12:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>Withdrawn: BELL-CVE-2026-80682 — CVE-2026-80682 does not affect BellSoft software</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-80682</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Withdrawn by the publisher.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-80682</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-361570</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-361570</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-361570</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-361570</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-80682</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-80682</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;riscv/mm: use physical alignment for vmemmap_start_pfn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RISC-V computes vmemmap_start_pfn by rounding phys_ram_base down to
VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN.  That alignment must therefore be expressed in the
physical-address domain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit 476849b0fba4 (&amp;#34;riscv/mm: align vmemmap to maximal folio size&amp;#34;)
attempted to account for the maximal folio alignment by feeding
MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN directly into VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN.  However,
MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN is measured in bytes of struct page storage,
whereas VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN is used to align a physical address.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mask-based compound_info encoding requires pfn_to_page(0) to be
naturally aligned to MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN.  Commit 9f94db4c7eaa
(&amp;#34;mm/sparse: check memmap alignment for compound_info_has_mask()&amp;#34;) added a
check for that requirement and exposed the unit mismatch on systems such
as QEMU virt, where the DRAM base is not aligned to MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES *
PAGE_SIZE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is the log:
[    0.000000][    C0] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.000000][    C0] WARNING: mm/sparse.c:365 at sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe, CPU#0: swapper/0
[    0.000000][    C0] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000][    C0] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 7.2.0-rc3-g1d8304bdd65f #2 PREEMPT 
[    0.000000][    C0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[    0.000000][    C0] epc : sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe
[    0.000000][    C0]  ra : sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe
[    0.000000][    C…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;riscv/mm: use physical alignment for vmemmap_start_pfn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RISC-V computes vmemmap_start_pfn by rounding phys_ram_base down to
VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN.  That alignment must therefore be expressed in the
physical-address domain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit 476849b0fba4 (&amp;#34;riscv/mm: align vmemmap to maximal folio size&amp;#34;)
attempted to account for the maximal folio alignment by feeding
MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN directly into VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN.  However,
MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN is measured in bytes of struct page storage,
whereas VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN is used to align a physical address.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mask-based compound_info encoding requires pfn_to_page(0) to be
naturally aligned to MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN.  Commit 9f94db4c7eaa
(&amp;#34;mm/sparse: check memmap alignment for compound_info_has_mask()&amp;#34;) added a
check for that requirement and exposed the unit mismatch on systems such
as QEMU virt, where the DRAM base is not aligned to MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES *
PAGE_SIZE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is the log:
[    0.000000][    C0] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.000000][    C0] WARNING: mm/sparse.c:365 at sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe, CPU#0: swapper/0
[    0.000000][    C0] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000][    C0] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 7.2.0-rc3-g1d8304bdd65f #2 PREEMPT 
[    0.000000][    C0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[    0.000000][    C0] epc : sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe
[    0.000000][    C0]  ra : sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe
[    0.000000][    C…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-80682</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-r646-7cf5-pgjc</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-r646-7cf5-pgjc</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;riscv/mm: use physical alignment for vmemmap_start_pfn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RISC-V computes vmemmap_start_pfn by rounding phys_ram_base down to
VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN.  That alignment must therefore be expressed in the
physical-address domain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit 476849b0fba4 (&amp;#34;riscv/mm: align vmemmap to maximal folio size&amp;#34;)
attempted to account for the maximal folio alignment by feeding
MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN directly into VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN.  However,
MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN is measured in bytes of struct page storage,
whereas VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN is used to align a physical address.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mask-based compound_info encoding requires pfn_to_page(0) to be
naturally aligned to MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN.  Commit 9f94db4c7eaa
(&amp;#34;mm/sparse: check memmap alignment for compound_info_has_mask()&amp;#34;) added a
check for that requirement and exposed the unit mismatch on systems such
as QEMU virt, where the DRAM base is not aligned to MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES *
PAGE_SIZE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is the log:
[    0.000000][    C0] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.000000][    C0] WARNING: mm/sparse.c:365 at sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe, CPU#0: swapper/0
[    0.000000][    C0] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000][    C0] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 7.2.0-rc3-g1d8304bdd65f #2 PREEMPT 
[    0.000000][    C0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[    0.000000][    C0] epc : sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe
[    0.000000][    C0]  ra : sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe
[    0.000000][    C…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;riscv/mm: use physical alignment for vmemmap_start_pfn&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RISC-V computes vmemmap_start_pfn by rounding phys_ram_base down to
VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN.  That alignment must therefore be expressed in the
physical-address domain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Commit 476849b0fba4 (&amp;#34;riscv/mm: align vmemmap to maximal folio size&amp;#34;)
attempted to account for the maximal folio alignment by feeding
MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN directly into VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN.  However,
MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN is measured in bytes of struct page storage,
whereas VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN is used to align a physical address.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The mask-based compound_info encoding requires pfn_to_page(0) to be
naturally aligned to MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN.  Commit 9f94db4c7eaa
(&amp;#34;mm/sparse: check memmap alignment for compound_info_has_mask()&amp;#34;) added a
check for that requirement and exposed the unit mismatch on systems such
as QEMU virt, where the DRAM base is not aligned to MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES *
PAGE_SIZE.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Here is the log:
[    0.000000][    C0] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    0.000000][    C0] WARNING: mm/sparse.c:365 at sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe, CPU#0: swapper/0
[    0.000000][    C0] Modules linked in:
[    0.000000][    C0] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 7.2.0-rc3-g1d8304bdd65f #2 PREEMPT 
[    0.000000][    C0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT)
[    0.000000][    C0] epc : sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe
[    0.000000][    C0]  ra : sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe
[    0.000000][    C…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-r646-7cf5-pgjc</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-80682</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-80682</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 95 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: riscv/mm: use physical alignment for vmemmap_start_pfn RISC-V computes vmemmap_start_pfn by rounding phys_ram_base down to VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN.  That alignment must therefore be expressed in the physical-address domain. Commit 476849b0fba4 (&amp;#34;riscv/mm: align vmemmap to maximal folio size&amp;#34;) attempted to account for the maximal folio alignment by feeding MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN directly into VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN.  However, MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN is measured in bytes of struct page storage, whereas VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN is used to align a physical address. The mask-based compound_info encoding requires pfn_to_page(0) to be naturally aligned to MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN.  Commit 9f94db4c7eaa (&amp;#34;mm/sparse: check memmap alignment for compound_info_has_mask()&amp;#34;) added a check for that requirement and exposed the unit mismatch on systems such as QEMU virt, where the DRAM base is not aligned to MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE. Here is the log: [    0.000000][    C0] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [    0.000000][    C0] WARNING: mm/sparse.c:365 at sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe, CPU#0: swapper/0 [    0.000000][    C0] Modules linked in: [    0.000000][    C0] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 7.2.0-rc3-g1d8304bdd65f #2 PREEMPT [    0.000000][    C0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) [    0.000000][    C0] epc : sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe [    0.000000][    C0]  ra : sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe [    0.000000][    C0] epc…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 95 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: riscv/mm: use physical alignment for vmemmap_start_pfn RISC-V computes vmemmap_start_pfn by rounding phys_ram_base down to VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN.  That alignment must therefore be expressed in the physical-address domain. Commit 476849b0fba4 (&amp;#34;riscv/mm: align vmemmap to maximal folio size&amp;#34;) attempted to account for the maximal folio alignment by feeding MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN directly into VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN.  However, MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN is measured in bytes of struct page storage, whereas VMEMMAP_ADDR_ALIGN is used to align a physical address. The mask-based compound_info encoding requires pfn_to_page(0) to be naturally aligned to MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN.  Commit 9f94db4c7eaa (&amp;#34;mm/sparse: check memmap alignment for compound_info_has_mask()&amp;#34;) added a check for that requirement and exposed the unit mismatch on systems such as QEMU virt, where the DRAM base is not aligned to MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES * PAGE_SIZE. Here is the log: [    0.000000][    C0] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [    0.000000][    C0] WARNING: mm/sparse.c:365 at sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe, CPU#0: swapper/0 [    0.000000][    C0] Modules linked in: [    0.000000][    C0] CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 7.2.0-rc3-g1d8304bdd65f #2 PREEMPT [    0.000000][    C0] Hardware name: riscv-virtio,qemu (DT) [    0.000000][    C0] epc : sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe [    0.000000][    C0]  ra : sparse_init+0x58a/0x6fe [    0.000000][    C0] epc…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-80682</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-3075 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3075</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, darunter möglicherweise Speicherbeschädigungen, die Offenlegung oder Manipulation von Daten sowie Denial-of-Service-Zustände.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, darunter möglicherweise Speicherbeschädigungen, die Offenlegung oder Manipulation von Daten sowie Denial-of-Service-Zustände.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
