<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 17:04:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-74688</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-74688</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-74688</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1090 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1090</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1090</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1090</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-358549</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-358549</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-358549</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-358549</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-74688</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-74688</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sctp: clear control chunk transport if it is being removed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sctp_make_heartbeat_ack() caches the destination transport in
chunk-&amp;gt;transport without taking a reference. When src_out_of_asoc_ok is
enabled, the HEARTBEAT ACK may remain queued on control_chunk_list instead
of being transmitted immediately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the peer transport is removed while the chunk is still queued,
sctp_assoc_rm_peer() drops the transport and schedules it for RCU freeing,
but only clears cached transport pointers in out_chunk_list.  The queued
control chunk therefore retains a dangling transport pointer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once an ASCONF_ACK clears the suppression and the queued control chunk is
transmitted, SCTP dereferences the stale transport pointer, leading to a
use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by also clearing chunk-&amp;gt;transport for queued control chunks in
control_chunk_list when removing the transport.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sctp: clear control chunk transport if it is being removed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sctp_make_heartbeat_ack() caches the destination transport in
chunk-&amp;gt;transport without taking a reference. When src_out_of_asoc_ok is
enabled, the HEARTBEAT ACK may remain queued on control_chunk_list instead
of being transmitted immediately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the peer transport is removed while the chunk is still queued,
sctp_assoc_rm_peer() drops the transport and schedules it for RCU freeing,
but only clears cached transport pointers in out_chunk_list.  The queued
control chunk therefore retains a dangling transport pointer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once an ASCONF_ACK clears the suppression and the queued control chunk is
transmitted, SCTP dereferences the stale transport pointer, leading to a
use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by also clearing chunk-&amp;gt;transport for queued control chunks in
control_chunk_list when removing the transport.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-74688</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-3vfv-7x6v-8jg6</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3vfv-7x6v-8jg6</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sctp: clear control chunk transport if it is being removed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sctp_make_heartbeat_ack() caches the destination transport in
chunk-&amp;gt;transport without taking a reference. When src_out_of_asoc_ok is
enabled, the HEARTBEAT ACK may remain queued on control_chunk_list instead
of being transmitted immediately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the peer transport is removed while the chunk is still queued,
sctp_assoc_rm_peer() drops the transport and schedules it for RCU freeing,
but only clears cached transport pointers in out_chunk_list.  The queued
control chunk therefore retains a dangling transport pointer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once an ASCONF_ACK clears the suppression and the queued control chunk is
transmitted, SCTP dereferences the stale transport pointer, leading to a
use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by also clearing chunk-&amp;gt;transport for queued control chunks in
control_chunk_list when removing the transport.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sctp: clear control chunk transport if it is being removed&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sctp_make_heartbeat_ack() caches the destination transport in
chunk-&amp;gt;transport without taking a reference. When src_out_of_asoc_ok is
enabled, the HEARTBEAT ACK may remain queued on control_chunk_list instead
of being transmitted immediately.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If the peer transport is removed while the chunk is still queued,
sctp_assoc_rm_peer() drops the transport and schedules it for RCU freeing,
but only clears cached transport pointers in out_chunk_list.  The queued
control chunk therefore retains a dangling transport pointer.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once an ASCONF_ACK clears the suppression and the queued control chunk is
transmitted, SCTP dereferences the stale transport pointer, leading to a
use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by also clearing chunk-&amp;gt;transport for queued control chunks in
control_chunk_list when removing the transport.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3vfv-7x6v-8jg6</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-74688 — sctp: clear control chunk transport if it is being removed</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-74688</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-74688</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-74688</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-3707 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3707</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;seg6: separate dst_cache for input and output paths in seg6 lwtunnel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The seg6 lwtunnel uses a single dst_cache per encap route, shared
between seg6_input_core() and seg6_output_core(). These two paths
can perform the post-encap SID lookup in different routing contexts
(e.g., ip rules matching on the ingress interface, or VRF table
separation). Whichever path runs first populates the cache, and the
other reuses it blindly, bypassing its own lookup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by splitting the cache into cache_input and cache_output,
so each path maintains its own cached dst independently.(CVE-2026-31668)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RDMA/rxe: Fix iova-to-va conversion for MR page sizes != PAGE_SIZE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current implementation incorrectly handles memory regions (MRs) with
page sizes different from the system PAGE_SIZE. The core issue is that
rxe_set_page() is called with mr-&amp;amp;gt;page_size step increments, but the
page_list stores individual struct page pointers, each representing
PAGE_SIZE of memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ib_sg_to_page() has ensured that when i&amp;amp;gt;=1 either
a) SG[i-1].dma_end and SG[i].dma_addr are contiguous
or
b) SG[i-1].dma_end and SG[i].dma_addr are mr-&amp;amp;gt;page_size aligned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leads to incorrect iova-to-va conversion in scenarios:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) page_size &amp;amp;lt; PAGE_SIZE (e.g., MR: 4K, system: 64K):
   ibmr-&amp;amp;gt;iova = 0x1…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;seg6: separate dst_cache for input and output paths in seg6 lwtunnel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The seg6 lwtunnel uses a single dst_cache per encap route, shared
between seg6_input_core() and seg6_output_core(). These two paths
can perform the post-encap SID lookup in different routing contexts
(e.g., ip rules matching on the ingress interface, or VRF table
separation). Whichever path runs first populates the cache, and the
other reuses it blindly, bypassing its own lookup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by splitting the cache into cache_input and cache_output,
so each path maintains its own cached dst independently.(CVE-2026-31668)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RDMA/rxe: Fix iova-to-va conversion for MR page sizes != PAGE_SIZE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current implementation incorrectly handles memory regions (MRs) with
page sizes different from the system PAGE_SIZE. The core issue is that
rxe_set_page() is called with mr-&amp;amp;gt;page_size step increments, but the
page_list stores individual struct page pointers, each representing
PAGE_SIZE of memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ib_sg_to_page() has ensured that when i&amp;amp;gt;=1 either
a) SG[i-1].dma_end and SG[i].dma_addr are contiguous
or
b) SG[i-1].dma_end and SG[i].dma_addr are mr-&amp;amp;gt;page_size aligned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leads to incorrect iova-to-va conversion in scenarios:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) page_size &amp;amp;lt; PAGE_SIZE (e.g., MR: 4K, system: 64K):
   ibmr-&amp;amp;gt;iova = 0x1…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3707</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-74688</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-74688</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: clear control chunk transport if it is being removed sctp_make_heartbeat_ack() caches the destination transport in chunk-&amp;gt;transport without taking a reference. When src_out_of_asoc_ok is enabled, the HEARTBEAT ACK may remain queued on control_chunk_list instead of being transmitted immediately. If the peer transport is removed while the chunk is still queued, sctp_assoc_rm_peer() drops the transport and schedules it for RCU freeing, but only clears cached transport pointers in out_chunk_list.  The queued control chunk therefore retains a dangling transport pointer. Once an ASCONF_ACK clears the suppression and the queued control chunk is transmitted, SCTP dereferences the stale transport pointer, leading to a use-after-free. Fix this by also clearing chunk-&amp;gt;transport for queued control chunks in control_chunk_list when removing the transport.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sctp: clear control chunk transport if it is being removed sctp_make_heartbeat_ack() caches the destination transport in chunk-&amp;gt;transport without taking a reference. When src_out_of_asoc_ok is enabled, the HEARTBEAT ACK may remain queued on control_chunk_list instead of being transmitted immediately. If the peer transport is removed while the chunk is still queued, sctp_assoc_rm_peer() drops the transport and schedules it for RCU freeing, but only clears cached transport pointers in out_chunk_list.  The queued control chunk therefore retains a dangling transport pointer. Once an ASCONF_ACK clears the suppression and the queued control chunk is transmitted, SCTP dereferences the stale transport pointer, leading to a use-after-free. Fix this by also clearing chunk-&amp;gt;transport for queued control chunks in control_chunk_list when removing the transport.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-74688</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2970 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2970</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
