<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 04:03:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-74658</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-74658</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-74658</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1090 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1090</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1090</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1090</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-357779</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-357779</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-357779</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-357779</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-74658</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-74658</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;futex: Prevent robust futex exit race some more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A robust futex unlock stores 0 over the whole futex value - wiping
FUTEX_WAITERS - and wakes a single waiter. That wakeup is a one-shot
notification: the protocol relies on its recipient to either acquire the
futex (and eventually unlock while aware of the remaining contention) or
re-arm FUTEX_WAITERS before sleeping again.  If the woken waiter is killed
before it can do either, the kernel must jump in and wake the next task
down the line.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a known complication of the futex protocol with a previous
partial fix in commit ca16d5bee598 (&amp;#34;futex: Prevent robust futex exit
race&amp;#34;). Unfortunately, that fix is insufficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a third task re-acquired the futex through the uncontended fast
path in the meantime, the notification is lost: robust exit processing
sees that it is owned by another task and does nothing, while the new
owner sees no FUTEX_WAITERS when it unlocks and wakes nobody.
The remaining waiters sleep forever behind a free futex:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A owns the futex, B and C sleep in FUTEX_WAIT
                                        uval == A | FUTEX_WAITERS
  A robust unlock: store 0, FUTEX_WAKE(1) wakes B
                                        uval == 0
  D fast path acquire: cmpxchg(0 -&amp;gt; D)
                                        uval == D, no FUTEX_WAITERS
  B killed before acting on the wakeup
  B exit walk, pending op: owner D != B -&amp;gt; no action
  D unlo…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;futex: Prevent robust futex exit race some more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A robust futex unlock stores 0 over the whole futex value - wiping
FUTEX_WAITERS - and wakes a single waiter. That wakeup is a one-shot
notification: the protocol relies on its recipient to either acquire the
futex (and eventually unlock while aware of the remaining contention) or
re-arm FUTEX_WAITERS before sleeping again.  If the woken waiter is killed
before it can do either, the kernel must jump in and wake the next task
down the line.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a known complication of the futex protocol with a previous
partial fix in commit ca16d5bee598 (&amp;#34;futex: Prevent robust futex exit
race&amp;#34;). Unfortunately, that fix is insufficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a third task re-acquired the futex through the uncontended fast
path in the meantime, the notification is lost: robust exit processing
sees that it is owned by another task and does nothing, while the new
owner sees no FUTEX_WAITERS when it unlocks and wakes nobody.
The remaining waiters sleep forever behind a free futex:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A owns the futex, B and C sleep in FUTEX_WAIT
                                        uval == A | FUTEX_WAITERS
  A robust unlock: store 0, FUTEX_WAKE(1) wakes B
                                        uval == 0
  D fast path acquire: cmpxchg(0 -&amp;gt; D)
                                        uval == D, no FUTEX_WAITERS
  B killed before acting on the wakeup
  B exit walk, pending op: owner D != B -&amp;gt; no action
  D unlo…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-74658</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-m8rg-mx7q-fp2c</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-m8rg-mx7q-fp2c</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;futex: Prevent robust futex exit race some more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A robust futex unlock stores 0 over the whole futex value - wiping
FUTEX_WAITERS - and wakes a single waiter. That wakeup is a one-shot
notification: the protocol relies on its recipient to either acquire the
futex (and eventually unlock while aware of the remaining contention) or
re-arm FUTEX_WAITERS before sleeping again.  If the woken waiter is killed
before it can do either, the kernel must jump in and wake the next task
down the line.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a known complication of the futex protocol with a previous
partial fix in commit ca16d5bee598 (&amp;#34;futex: Prevent robust futex exit
race&amp;#34;). Unfortunately, that fix is insufficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a third task re-acquired the futex through the uncontended fast
path in the meantime, the notification is lost: robust exit processing
sees that it is owned by another task and does nothing, while the new
owner sees no FUTEX_WAITERS when it unlocks and wakes nobody.
The remaining waiters sleep forever behind a free futex:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A owns the futex, B and C sleep in FUTEX_WAIT
                                        uval == A | FUTEX_WAITERS
  A robust unlock: store 0, FUTEX_WAKE(1) wakes B
                                        uval == 0
  D fast path acquire: cmpxchg(0 -&amp;gt; D)
                                        uval == D, no FUTEX_WAITERS
  B killed before acting on the wakeup
  B exit walk, pending op: owner D != B -&amp;gt; no action
  D unlo…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;futex: Prevent robust futex exit race some more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A robust futex unlock stores 0 over the whole futex value - wiping
FUTEX_WAITERS - and wakes a single waiter. That wakeup is a one-shot
notification: the protocol relies on its recipient to either acquire the
futex (and eventually unlock while aware of the remaining contention) or
re-arm FUTEX_WAITERS before sleeping again.  If the woken waiter is killed
before it can do either, the kernel must jump in and wake the next task
down the line.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a known complication of the futex protocol with a previous
partial fix in commit ca16d5bee598 (&amp;#34;futex: Prevent robust futex exit
race&amp;#34;). Unfortunately, that fix is insufficient.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If a third task re-acquired the futex through the uncontended fast
path in the meantime, the notification is lost: robust exit processing
sees that it is owned by another task and does nothing, while the new
owner sees no FUTEX_WAITERS when it unlocks and wakes nobody.
The remaining waiters sleep forever behind a free futex:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A owns the futex, B and C sleep in FUTEX_WAIT
                                        uval == A | FUTEX_WAITERS
  A robust unlock: store 0, FUTEX_WAKE(1) wakes B
                                        uval == 0
  D fast path acquire: cmpxchg(0 -&amp;gt; D)
                                        uval == D, no FUTEX_WAITERS
  B killed before acting on the wakeup
  B exit walk, pending op: owner D != B -&amp;gt; no action
  D unlo…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-m8rg-mx7q-fp2c</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-74658 — futex: Prevent robust futex exit race some more</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-74658</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-74658</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-74658</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-3706 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3706</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: af_can: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in can_create()On error can_create() frees the allocated sk object, but sock_init_data()has already attached it to the provided sock object. This will leave adangling sk pointer in the sock object and may cause use-after-free later.(CVE-2024-56603)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hdlc_ppp: sync per-proto timers before freeing hdlc state&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Each PPP control protocol (LCP/IPCP/IPV6CP) embedded in struct ppp
registers a timer via timer_setup(). That struct ppp is the
hdlc-&amp;amp;gt;state allocation, which detach_hdlc_protocol() frees with kfree()
in both teardown paths: unregister_hdlc_device() and the re-attach inside
attach_hdlc_protocol().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ppp proto never registered a .detach callback, so
detach_hdlc_protocol() performs no timer synchronization before the
kfree(). The only cancel, timer_delete(&amp;amp;amp;proto-&amp;amp;gt;timer) in ppp_cp_event(),
is partial (it does not wait for a running callback) and only runs on the
-&amp;amp;gt;CLOSED transition; ppp_stop()/ppp_close() do not sync either. A
ppp_timer callback already executing (blocked on ppp-&amp;amp;gt;lock) survives the
kfree and then dereferences proto-&amp;amp;gt;state / ppp-&amp;amp;gt;lock in freed memory,
leading to a use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by adding a .detach helper that calls timer_shutdown_sync() on
every per-proto timer. detach_hd…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:net: af_can: do not leave a dangling sk pointer in can_create()On error can_create() frees the allocated sk object, but sock_init_data()has already attached it to the provided sock object. This will leave adangling sk pointer in the sock object and may cause use-after-free later.(CVE-2024-56603)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;hdlc_ppp: sync per-proto timers before freeing hdlc state&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Each PPP control protocol (LCP/IPCP/IPV6CP) embedded in struct ppp
registers a timer via timer_setup(). That struct ppp is the
hdlc-&amp;amp;gt;state allocation, which detach_hdlc_protocol() frees with kfree()
in both teardown paths: unregister_hdlc_device() and the re-attach inside
attach_hdlc_protocol().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The ppp proto never registered a .detach callback, so
detach_hdlc_protocol() performs no timer synchronization before the
kfree(). The only cancel, timer_delete(&amp;amp;amp;proto-&amp;amp;gt;timer) in ppp_cp_event(),
is partial (it does not wait for a running callback) and only runs on the
-&amp;amp;gt;CLOSED transition; ppp_stop()/ppp_close() do not sync either. A
ppp_timer callback already executing (blocked on ppp-&amp;amp;gt;lock) survives the
kfree and then dereferences proto-&amp;amp;gt;state / ppp-&amp;amp;gt;lock in freed memory,
leading to a use-after-free.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by adding a .detach helper that calls timer_shutdown_sync() on
every per-proto timer. detach_hd…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3706</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-74658</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-74658</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0 and 236 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: futex: Prevent robust futex exit race some more A robust futex unlock stores 0 over the whole futex value - wiping FUTEX_WAITERS - and wakes a single waiter. That wakeup is a one-shot notification: the protocol relies on its recipient to either acquire the futex (and eventually unlock while aware of the remaining contention) or re-arm FUTEX_WAITERS before sleeping again.  If the woken waiter is killed before it can do either, the kernel must jump in and wake the next task down the line. This is a known complication of the futex protocol with a previous partial fix in commit ca16d5bee598 (&amp;#34;futex: Prevent robust futex exit race&amp;#34;). Unfortunately, that fix is insufficient. If a third task re-acquired the futex through the uncontended fast path in the meantime, the notification is lost: robust exit processing sees that it is owned by another task and does nothing, while the new owner sees no FUTEX_WAITERS when it unlocks and wakes nobody. The remaining waiters sleep forever behind a free futex:   A owns the futex, B and C sleep in FUTEX_WAIT                                         uval == A | FUTEX_WAITERS   A robust unlock: store 0, FUTEX_WAKE(1) wakes B                                         uval == 0   D fast path acquire: cmpxchg(0 -&amp;gt; D)                                         uval == D, no FUTEX_WAITERS   B killed before acting on the wakeup   B exit walk, pending op: owner D != B -&amp;gt; no action   D unlock: n…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-oracle, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0 and 236 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: futex: Prevent robust futex exit race some more A robust futex unlock stores 0 over the whole futex value - wiping FUTEX_WAITERS - and wakes a single waiter. That wakeup is a one-shot notification: the protocol relies on its recipient to either acquire the futex (and eventually unlock while aware of the remaining contention) or re-arm FUTEX_WAITERS before sleeping again.  If the woken waiter is killed before it can do either, the kernel must jump in and wake the next task down the line. This is a known complication of the futex protocol with a previous partial fix in commit ca16d5bee598 (&amp;#34;futex: Prevent robust futex exit race&amp;#34;). Unfortunately, that fix is insufficient. If a third task re-acquired the futex through the uncontended fast path in the meantime, the notification is lost: robust exit processing sees that it is owned by another task and does nothing, while the new owner sees no FUTEX_WAITERS when it unlocks and wakes nobody. The remaining waiters sleep forever behind a free futex:   A owns the futex, B and C sleep in FUTEX_WAIT                                         uval == A | FUTEX_WAITERS   A robust unlock: store 0, FUTEX_WAKE(1) wakes B                                         uval == 0   D fast path acquire: cmpxchg(0 -&amp;gt; D)                                         uval == D, no FUTEX_WAITERS   B killed before acting on the wakeup   B exit walk, pending op: owner D != B -&amp;gt; no action   D unlock: n…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-74658</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2970 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2970</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
