<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 05:22:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-74632</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-74632</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-74632</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1090 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1090</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1090</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1090</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-359853</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-359853</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-359853</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-359853</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-74632</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-74632</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race&amp;#34;, v2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a subtle race in the reference-counted huge_zero_folio
implementation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fast path atomic logic fails to account for the fact that the shrinker
(which drops the final huge_zero_refcount pin) can overwrite huge_zero_pfn
with the ~0UL sentinel value in shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() after a
racing get_huge_zero_folio() installed a valid value there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This results in huge_zero_folio being correctly set but huge_zero_pfn
being set incorrectly and thus is_huge_zero_pfn() and consequently
is_huge_zero_pmd() will misidentify the huge zero folio as being an
ordinary THP folio.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can result in the huge zero folio being split and otherwise treated
incorrectly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The solution to this is very subtle as there is an atomic fast path, and
thus ordering in weakly ordered architectures has to be treated very
carefully.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first commit fixes the issue by introducing a spinlock around
huge_zero_[pfn, folio, refcount] write, with careful consideration paid to
load/store ordering in the fast path.  It is placed first and kept as
small as possible so that it can be backported on its own.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second commit is a pure cleanup which reworks the
CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO logic to better separate the persistent
logic from the dynamically allocated one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 2):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If !CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO,…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race&amp;#34;, v2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a subtle race in the reference-counted huge_zero_folio
implementation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fast path atomic logic fails to account for the fact that the shrinker
(which drops the final huge_zero_refcount pin) can overwrite huge_zero_pfn
with the ~0UL sentinel value in shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() after a
racing get_huge_zero_folio() installed a valid value there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This results in huge_zero_folio being correctly set but huge_zero_pfn
being set incorrectly and thus is_huge_zero_pfn() and consequently
is_huge_zero_pmd() will misidentify the huge zero folio as being an
ordinary THP folio.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can result in the huge zero folio being split and otherwise treated
incorrectly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The solution to this is very subtle as there is an atomic fast path, and
thus ordering in weakly ordered architectures has to be treated very
carefully.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first commit fixes the issue by introducing a spinlock around
huge_zero_[pfn, folio, refcount] write, with careful consideration paid to
load/store ordering in the fast path.  It is placed first and kept as
small as possible so that it can be backported on its own.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second commit is a pure cleanup which reworks the
CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO logic to better separate the persistent
logic from the dynamically allocated one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 2):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If !CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO,…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-74632</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race&amp;#34;, v2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a subtle race in the reference-counted huge_zero_folio
implementation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fast path atomic logic fails to account for the fact that the shrinker
(which drops the final huge_zero_refcount pin) can overwrite huge_zero_pfn
with the ~0UL sentinel value in shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() after a
racing get_huge_zero_folio() installed a valid value there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This results in huge_zero_folio being correctly set but huge_zero_pfn
being set incorrectly and thus is_huge_zero_pfn() and consequently
is_huge_zero_pmd() will misidentify the huge zero folio as being an
ordinary THP folio.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can result in the huge zero folio being split and otherwise treated
incorrectly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The solution to this is very subtle as there is an atomic fast path, and
thus ordering in weakly ordered architectures has to be treated very
carefully.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first commit fixes the issue by introducing a spinlock around
huge_zero_[pfn, folio, refcount] write, with careful consideration paid to
load/store ordering in the fast path.  It is placed first and kept as
small as possible so that it can be backported on its own.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second commit is a pure cleanup which reworks the
CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO logic to better separate the persistent
logic from the dynamically allocated one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 2):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If !CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO,…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Patch series &amp;#34;mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race&amp;#34;, v2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a subtle race in the reference-counted huge_zero_folio
implementation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fast path atomic logic fails to account for the fact that the shrinker
(which drops the final huge_zero_refcount pin) can overwrite huge_zero_pfn
with the ~0UL sentinel value in shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() after a
racing get_huge_zero_folio() installed a valid value there.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This results in huge_zero_folio being correctly set but huge_zero_pfn
being set incorrectly and thus is_huge_zero_pfn() and consequently
is_huge_zero_pmd() will misidentify the huge zero folio as being an
ordinary THP folio.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This can result in the huge zero folio being split and otherwise treated
incorrectly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The solution to this is very subtle as there is an atomic fast path, and
thus ordering in weakly ordered architectures has to be treated very
carefully.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The first commit fixes the issue by introducing a spinlock around
huge_zero_[pfn, folio, refcount] write, with careful consideration paid to
load/store ordering in the fast path.  It is placed first and kept as
small as possible so that it can be backported on its own.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The second commit is a pure cleanup which reworks the
CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO logic to better separate the persistent
logic from the dynamically allocated one.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch (of 2):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;If !CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO,…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-cqxm-9w3w-mjmc</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-74632 — mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-74632</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-74632</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-74632</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-74632</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-74632</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 215 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race Patch series &amp;#34;mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race&amp;#34;, v2. There is a subtle race in the reference-counted huge_zero_folio implementation. The fast path atomic logic fails to account for the fact that the shrinker (which drops the final huge_zero_refcount pin) can overwrite huge_zero_pfn with the ~0UL sentinel value in shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() after a racing get_huge_zero_folio() installed a valid value there. This results in huge_zero_folio being correctly set but huge_zero_pfn being set incorrectly and thus is_huge_zero_pfn() and consequently is_huge_zero_pmd() will misidentify the huge zero folio as being an ordinary THP folio. This can result in the huge zero folio being split and otherwise treated incorrectly. The solution to this is very subtle as there is an atomic fast path, and thus ordering in weakly ordered architectures has to be treated very carefully. The first commit fixes the issue by introducing a spinlock around huge_zero_[pfn, folio, refcount] write, with careful consideration paid to load/store ordering in the fast path.  It is placed first and kept as small as possible so that it can be backported on its own. The second commit is a pure cleanup which reworks the CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO logic to better separate the persistent logic from the dynamically allocated one. This patch (of 2): If !CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO, the huge_ze…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 215 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race Patch series &amp;#34;mm/huge_memory: fix huge_zero_pfn race&amp;#34;, v2. There is a subtle race in the reference-counted huge_zero_folio implementation. The fast path atomic logic fails to account for the fact that the shrinker (which drops the final huge_zero_refcount pin) can overwrite huge_zero_pfn with the ~0UL sentinel value in shrink_huge_zero_folio_scan() after a racing get_huge_zero_folio() installed a valid value there. This results in huge_zero_folio being correctly set but huge_zero_pfn being set incorrectly and thus is_huge_zero_pfn() and consequently is_huge_zero_pmd() will misidentify the huge zero folio as being an ordinary THP folio. This can result in the huge zero folio being split and otherwise treated incorrectly. The solution to this is very subtle as there is an atomic fast path, and thus ordering in weakly ordered architectures has to be treated very carefully. The first commit fixes the issue by introducing a spinlock around huge_zero_[pfn, folio, refcount] write, with careful consideration paid to load/store ordering in the fast path.  It is placed first and kept as small as possible so that it can be backported on its own. The second commit is a pure cleanup which reworks the CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO logic to better separate the persistent logic from the dynamically allocated one. This patch (of 2): If !CONFIG_PERSISTENT_HUGE_ZERO_FOLIO, the huge_ze…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-74632</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2970 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2970</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2970</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
