<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:13:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-74506</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-74506</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-74506</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-354240</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-354240</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-354240</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-354240</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-74506</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-74506</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;afs: Fix UAF when sending a message&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In afs_make_call(), there&amp;#39;s a race with async call reception and
destruction.  If a call is dispatched that doesn&amp;#39;t have call-&amp;gt;write_iter
set (used to specify the data content for FS.StoreData), then the first
rxrpc_kernel_send_data() will not set MSG_MORE in the msghdr.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once rxrpc_send_data() queues the last request packet, the response could
come in at any time and cause the call to be completed and put.  However,
afs_make_call() will look at the call again to see it -&amp;gt;write_iter should
be handled - something it&amp;#39;s only allowed to do if it has its own ref on the
call.  Whilst this is the case for synchronous calls, it isn&amp;#39;t true for
async calls such as FS.FetchData.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s also a potential UAF in afs_make_call() in the event that an
asynchronous call is being sent, but the call fails in some way (e.g. it
gets aborted from the server).  The problem there is that afs_make_call()
tries to abort a call if the rxrpc send fails, but the asynchronous
notification from rxrpc may have caused the afs_call to be torn down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;generic/650 plays games with randomly taking CPUs offline, and can
interject a significant delay such that the call is deallocated before
afs_make_call() gets to check call-&amp;gt;write_iter - and a UAF ensues (caught
by KASAN).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in afs_make_call+0x1c90/0x2210 [kafs]
   Read of size 8 at addr ffff888035e050e8 by task fsstress/140…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;afs: Fix UAF when sending a message&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In afs_make_call(), there&amp;#39;s a race with async call reception and
destruction.  If a call is dispatched that doesn&amp;#39;t have call-&amp;gt;write_iter
set (used to specify the data content for FS.StoreData), then the first
rxrpc_kernel_send_data() will not set MSG_MORE in the msghdr.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once rxrpc_send_data() queues the last request packet, the response could
come in at any time and cause the call to be completed and put.  However,
afs_make_call() will look at the call again to see it -&amp;gt;write_iter should
be handled - something it&amp;#39;s only allowed to do if it has its own ref on the
call.  Whilst this is the case for synchronous calls, it isn&amp;#39;t true for
async calls such as FS.FetchData.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s also a potential UAF in afs_make_call() in the event that an
asynchronous call is being sent, but the call fails in some way (e.g. it
gets aborted from the server).  The problem there is that afs_make_call()
tries to abort a call if the rxrpc send fails, but the asynchronous
notification from rxrpc may have caused the afs_call to be torn down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;generic/650 plays games with randomly taking CPUs offline, and can
interject a significant delay such that the call is deallocated before
afs_make_call() gets to check call-&amp;gt;write_iter - and a UAF ensues (caught
by KASAN).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in afs_make_call+0x1c90/0x2210 [kafs]
   Read of size 8 at addr ffff888035e050e8 by task fsstress/140…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-74506</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-437r-ppxq-jxxh</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-437r-ppxq-jxxh</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;afs: Fix UAF when sending a message&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In afs_make_call(), there&amp;#39;s a race with async call reception and
destruction.  If a call is dispatched that doesn&amp;#39;t have call-&amp;gt;write_iter
set (used to specify the data content for FS.StoreData), then the first
rxrpc_kernel_send_data() will not set MSG_MORE in the msghdr.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once rxrpc_send_data() queues the last request packet, the response could
come in at any time and cause the call to be completed and put.  However,
afs_make_call() will look at the call again to see it -&amp;gt;write_iter should
be handled - something it&amp;#39;s only allowed to do if it has its own ref on the
call.  Whilst this is the case for synchronous calls, it isn&amp;#39;t true for
async calls such as FS.FetchData.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s also a potential UAF in afs_make_call() in the event that an
asynchronous call is being sent, but the call fails in some way (e.g. it
gets aborted from the server).  The problem there is that afs_make_call()
tries to abort a call if the rxrpc send fails, but the asynchronous
notification from rxrpc may have caused the afs_call to be torn down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;generic/650 plays games with randomly taking CPUs offline, and can
interject a significant delay such that the call is deallocated before
afs_make_call() gets to check call-&amp;gt;write_iter - and a UAF ensues (caught
by KASAN).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in afs_make_call+0x1c90/0x2210 [kafs]
   Read of size 8 at addr ffff888035e050e8 by task fsstress/140…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;afs: Fix UAF when sending a message&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In afs_make_call(), there&amp;#39;s a race with async call reception and
destruction.  If a call is dispatched that doesn&amp;#39;t have call-&amp;gt;write_iter
set (used to specify the data content for FS.StoreData), then the first
rxrpc_kernel_send_data() will not set MSG_MORE in the msghdr.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once rxrpc_send_data() queues the last request packet, the response could
come in at any time and cause the call to be completed and put.  However,
afs_make_call() will look at the call again to see it -&amp;gt;write_iter should
be handled - something it&amp;#39;s only allowed to do if it has its own ref on the
call.  Whilst this is the case for synchronous calls, it isn&amp;#39;t true for
async calls such as FS.FetchData.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There&amp;#39;s also a potential UAF in afs_make_call() in the event that an
asynchronous call is being sent, but the call fails in some way (e.g. it
gets aborted from the server).  The problem there is that afs_make_call()
tries to abort a call if the rxrpc send fails, but the asynchronous
notification from rxrpc may have caused the afs_call to be torn down.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;generic/650 plays games with randomly taking CPUs offline, and can
interject a significant delay such that the call is deallocated before
afs_make_call() gets to check call-&amp;gt;write_iter - and a UAF ensues (caught
by KASAN).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in afs_make_call+0x1c90/0x2210 [kafs]
   Read of size 8 at addr ffff888035e050e8 by task fsstress/140…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-437r-ppxq-jxxh</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-74506 — afs: Fix UAF when sending a message</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-74506</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-74506</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-74506</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-74506</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-74506</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 193 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: afs: Fix UAF when sending a message In afs_make_call(), there&amp;#39;s a race with async call reception and destruction.  If a call is dispatched that doesn&amp;#39;t have call-&amp;gt;write_iter set (used to specify the data content for FS.StoreData), then the first rxrpc_kernel_send_data() will not set MSG_MORE in the msghdr. Once rxrpc_send_data() queues the last request packet, the response could come in at any time and cause the call to be completed and put.  However, afs_make_call() will look at the call again to see it -&amp;gt;write_iter should be handled - something it&amp;#39;s only allowed to do if it has its own ref on the call.  Whilst this is the case for synchronous calls, it isn&amp;#39;t true for async calls such as FS.FetchData. There&amp;#39;s also a potential UAF in afs_make_call() in the event that an asynchronous call is being sent, but the call fails in some way (e.g. it gets aborted from the server).  The problem there is that afs_make_call() tries to abort a call if the rxrpc send fails, but the asynchronous notification from rxrpc may have caused the afs_call to be torn down. generic/650 plays games with randomly taking CPUs offline, and can interject a significant delay such that the call is deallocated before afs_make_call() gets to check call-&amp;gt;write_iter - and a UAF ensues (caught by KASAN).    BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in afs_make_call+0x1c90/0x2210 [kafs]    Read of size 8 at addr ffff888035e050e8 by task fsstress/1409 Fix…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 193 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: afs: Fix UAF when sending a message In afs_make_call(), there&amp;#39;s a race with async call reception and destruction.  If a call is dispatched that doesn&amp;#39;t have call-&amp;gt;write_iter set (used to specify the data content for FS.StoreData), then the first rxrpc_kernel_send_data() will not set MSG_MORE in the msghdr. Once rxrpc_send_data() queues the last request packet, the response could come in at any time and cause the call to be completed and put.  However, afs_make_call() will look at the call again to see it -&amp;gt;write_iter should be handled - something it&amp;#39;s only allowed to do if it has its own ref on the call.  Whilst this is the case for synchronous calls, it isn&amp;#39;t true for async calls such as FS.FetchData. There&amp;#39;s also a potential UAF in afs_make_call() in the event that an asynchronous call is being sent, but the call fails in some way (e.g. it gets aborted from the server).  The problem there is that afs_make_call() tries to abort a call if the rxrpc send fails, but the asynchronous notification from rxrpc may have caused the afs_call to be torn down. generic/650 plays games with randomly taking CPUs offline, and can interject a significant delay such that the call is deallocated before afs_make_call() gets to check call-&amp;gt;write_iter - and a UAF ensues (caught by KASAN).    BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in afs_make_call+0x1c90/0x2210 [kafs]    Read of size 8 at addr ffff888035e050e8 by task fsstress/1409 Fix…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-74506</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2852 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2852</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um root Rechte zu erlangen, um einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um root Rechte zu erlangen, um einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
