<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 11:31:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-74305</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-74305</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-74305</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1203 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoq…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1203</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1203</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1203</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-354160</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-354160</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-354160</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-354160</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-74305</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-74305</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix in commit abad3d0bad72 (&amp;#34;bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local
storage&amp;#34;) is still incomplete. The prog-array compatibility check
treats a program with no cgroup storage as compatible with any stored
storage cookie. This allows a storage-less program to bridge a tail
call chain between an entry program and a storage-using callee even
though cgroup local storage at runtime still follows the caller&amp;#39;s
context, that is, A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) -&amp;gt; C(storage) path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Requiring exact cookie equality would break the legitimate case of a
storage-less leaf program being tail called from a storage-using one.
Instead, only accept a zero storage cookie if the program cannot
perform tail calls itself. This keeps A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) working
while rejecting the A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) -&amp;gt; C(storage) bridge.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix in commit abad3d0bad72 (&amp;#34;bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local
storage&amp;#34;) is still incomplete. The prog-array compatibility check
treats a program with no cgroup storage as compatible with any stored
storage cookie. This allows a storage-less program to bridge a tail
call chain between an entry program and a storage-using callee even
though cgroup local storage at runtime still follows the caller&amp;#39;s
context, that is, A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) -&amp;gt; C(storage) path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Requiring exact cookie equality would break the legitimate case of a
storage-less leaf program being tail called from a storage-using one.
Instead, only accept a zero storage cookie if the program cannot
perform tail calls itself. This keeps A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) working
while rejecting the A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) -&amp;gt; C(storage) bridge.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-74305</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-7p9j-gmgx-g4fv</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7p9j-gmgx-g4fv</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix in commit abad3d0bad72 (&amp;#34;bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local
storage&amp;#34;) is still incomplete. The prog-array compatibility check
treats a program with no cgroup storage as compatible with any stored
storage cookie. This allows a storage-less program to bridge a tail
call chain between an entry program and a storage-using callee even
though cgroup local storage at runtime still follows the caller&amp;#39;s
context, that is, A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) -&amp;gt; C(storage) path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Requiring exact cookie equality would break the legitimate case of a
storage-less leaf program being tail called from a storage-using one.
Instead, only accept a zero storage cookie if the program cannot
perform tail calls itself. This keeps A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) working
while rejecting the A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) -&amp;gt; C(storage) bridge.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The fix in commit abad3d0bad72 (&amp;#34;bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local
storage&amp;#34;) is still incomplete. The prog-array compatibility check
treats a program with no cgroup storage as compatible with any stored
storage cookie. This allows a storage-less program to bridge a tail
call chain between an entry program and a storage-using callee even
though cgroup local storage at runtime still follows the caller&amp;#39;s
context, that is, A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) -&amp;gt; C(storage) path.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Requiring exact cookie equality would break the legitimate case of a
storage-less leaf program being tail called from a storage-using one.
Instead, only accept a zero storage cookie if the program cannot
perform tail calls itself. This keeps A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) working
while rejecting the A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) -&amp;gt; C(storage) bridge.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7p9j-gmgx-g4fv</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-3703 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3703</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ASoC: qcom: Fix sc7280 lpass potential buffer overflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Case values introduced in commit
5f78e1fb7a3e (&amp;amp;quot;ASoC: qcom: Add driver support for audioreach solution&amp;amp;quot;)
cause out of bounds access in arrays of sc7280 driver data (e.g. in case
of RX_CODEC_DMA_RX_0 in sc7280_snd_hw_params()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Redefine LPASS_MAX_PORTS to consider the maximum possible port id for
q6dsp as sc7280 driver utilizes some of those values.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2025-37979)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: usb: asix_devices: Fix PHY address mask in MDIO bus initialization&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Syzbot reported shift-out-of-bounds exception on MDIO bus initialization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The PHY address should be masked to 5 bits (0-31). Without this
mask, invalid PHY addresses could be used, potentially causing issues
with MDIO bus operations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by masking the PHY address with 0x1f (31 decimal) to ensure
it stays within the valid range.(CVE-2025-38736)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;crypto: af_alg - Fix page reassignment overflow in af_alg_pull_tsgl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When page reassignment was added to af_alg_pull_tsgl the original
loop wasn&amp;amp;apos;t updated so it may try to reassign one more page than
necessary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add the check to the reassignment so that this does not happen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also u…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ASoC: qcom: Fix sc7280 lpass potential buffer overflow&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Case values introduced in commit
5f78e1fb7a3e (&amp;amp;quot;ASoC: qcom: Add driver support for audioreach solution&amp;amp;quot;)
cause out of bounds access in arrays of sc7280 driver data (e.g. in case
of RX_CODEC_DMA_RX_0 in sc7280_snd_hw_params()).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Redefine LPASS_MAX_PORTS to consider the maximum possible port id for
q6dsp as sc7280 driver utilizes some of those values.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE.(CVE-2025-37979)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: usb: asix_devices: Fix PHY address mask in MDIO bus initialization&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Syzbot reported shift-out-of-bounds exception on MDIO bus initialization.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The PHY address should be masked to 5 bits (0-31). Without this
mask, invalid PHY addresses could be used, potentially causing issues
with MDIO bus operations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by masking the PHY address with 0x1f (31 decimal) to ensure
it stays within the valid range.(CVE-2025-38736)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;crypto: af_alg - Fix page reassignment overflow in af_alg_pull_tsgl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When page reassignment was added to af_alg_pull_tsgl the original
loop wasn&amp;amp;apos;t updated so it may try to reassign one more page than
necessary.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Add the check to the reassignment so that this does not happen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Also u…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3703</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-74305</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-74305</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 189 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays The fix in commit abad3d0bad72 (&amp;#34;bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local storage&amp;#34;) is still incomplete. The prog-array compatibility check treats a program with no cgroup storage as compatible with any stored storage cookie. This allows a storage-less program to bridge a tail call chain between an entry program and a storage-using callee even though cgroup local storage at runtime still follows the caller&amp;#39;s context, that is, A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) -&amp;gt; C(storage) path. Requiring exact cookie equality would break the legitimate case of a storage-less leaf program being tail called from a storage-using one. Instead, only accept a zero storage cookie if the program cannot perform tail calls itself. This keeps A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) working while rejecting the A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) -&amp;gt; C(storage) bridge.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 189 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays The fix in commit abad3d0bad72 (&amp;#34;bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local storage&amp;#34;) is still incomplete. The prog-array compatibility check treats a program with no cgroup storage as compatible with any stored storage cookie. This allows a storage-less program to bridge a tail call chain between an entry program and a storage-using callee even though cgroup local storage at runtime still follows the caller&amp;#39;s context, that is, A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) -&amp;gt; C(storage) path. Requiring exact cookie equality would break the legitimate case of a storage-less leaf program being tail called from a storage-using one. Instead, only accept a zero storage cookie if the program cannot perform tail calls itself. This keeps A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) working while rejecting the A -&amp;gt; B(no storage) -&amp;gt; C(storage) bridge.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-74305</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2852 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2852</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um root Rechte zu erlangen, um einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um root Rechte zu erlangen, um einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
