<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 05:13:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-351965</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-351965</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-351965</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-351965</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-73491</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-73491</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Loofah is a general library for manipulating and transforming HTML/XML documents and fragments, built on top of Nokogiri. From 2.25.0 until 2.25.2, Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? does not reject javascript: URIs whose scheme is split or prefixed with the HTML5 named whitespace character references &amp;amp;Tab; or &amp;amp;NewLine;. CGI.unescapeHTML leaves those references intact, so allowed_uri? reports the URL safe even though a browser decodes and strips the tab or line feed and executes the resulting javascript: URL. This issue affects only callers that pass HTML-encoded strings directly to allowed_uri?; Loofah&amp;#39;s default sanitize() path is not affected. This issue is fixed in version 2.25.2.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Loofah is a general library for manipulating and transforming HTML/XML documents and fragments, built on top of Nokogiri. From 2.25.0 until 2.25.2, Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? does not reject javascript: URIs whose scheme is split or prefixed with the HTML5 named whitespace character references &amp;amp;Tab; or &amp;amp;NewLine;. CGI.unescapeHTML leaves those references intact, so allowed_uri? reports the URL safe even though a browser decodes and strips the tab or line feed and executes the resulting javascript: URL. This issue affects only callers that pass HTML-encoded strings directly to allowed_uri?; Loofah&amp;#39;s default sanitize() path is not affected. This issue is fixed in version 2.25.2.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-73491</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-8whx-365g-h9vv — Loofah `allowed_uri?` does not detect `javascript:` URIs split by named whitespace character references</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8whx-365g-h9vv</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; RubyGems: loofah&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri?` does not correctly reject `javascript:` URIs when the scheme is split or prefixed by the HTML5 named character references `&amp;amp;Tab;` (tab) or `&amp;amp;NewLine;` (line feed).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a bypass of the fix for [GHSA-46fp-8f5p-pf2m](https://github.com/flavorjones/loofah/security/advisories/GHSA-46fp-8f5p-pf2m), which handled the equivalent numeric character references (`&amp;amp;#9;`, `&amp;amp;#10;`, `&amp;amp;#13;`) but did not cover the named forms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`allowed_uri?` decodes HTML entities with `CGI.unescapeHTML`, which handles numeric character references but not HTML5 named character references. Payloads like `java&amp;amp;Tab;script:alert(1)` are therefore left intact, so the method does not recognize the `javascript:` scheme and returns `true`. A browser, however, decodes `&amp;amp;Tab;` and `&amp;amp;NewLine;` to tab and line feed and strips them from the URL during parsing, producing `javascript:alert(1)`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`&amp;amp;Tab;` and `&amp;amp;NewLine;` are the only relevant named character references: across the HTML5 named-character table, they are the only two that decode to characters the WHATWG URL parser strips from a URL (U+0009 and U+000A; there is no named reference for U+000D). `&amp;amp;nbsp;` / `&amp;amp;NonBreakingSpace;` decode to U+00A0, which browsers do not strip, so they aren&amp;#39;t usable for this bypass.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that Loofah&amp;#39;s default `sanitize()` path is **not** affected, because Nokogiri decodes or entity-escapes HTML entities during parsing before Loofah evaluates the URI protocol. This issue o…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; RubyGems: loofah&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri?` does not correctly reject `javascript:` URIs when the scheme is split or prefixed by the HTML5 named character references `&amp;amp;Tab;` (tab) or `&amp;amp;NewLine;` (line feed).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a bypass of the fix for [GHSA-46fp-8f5p-pf2m](https://github.com/flavorjones/loofah/security/advisories/GHSA-46fp-8f5p-pf2m), which handled the equivalent numeric character references (`&amp;amp;#9;`, `&amp;amp;#10;`, `&amp;amp;#13;`) but did not cover the named forms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Details&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`allowed_uri?` decodes HTML entities with `CGI.unescapeHTML`, which handles numeric character references but not HTML5 named character references. Payloads like `java&amp;amp;Tab;script:alert(1)` are therefore left intact, so the method does not recognize the `javascript:` scheme and returns `true`. A browser, however, decodes `&amp;amp;Tab;` and `&amp;amp;NewLine;` to tab and line feed and strips them from the URL during parsing, producing `javascript:alert(1)`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;`&amp;amp;Tab;` and `&amp;amp;NewLine;` are the only relevant named character references: across the HTML5 named-character table, they are the only two that decode to characters the WHATWG URL parser strips from a URL (U+0009 and U+000A; there is no named reference for U+000D). `&amp;amp;nbsp;` / `&amp;amp;NonBreakingSpace;` decode to U+00A0, which browsers do not strip, so they aren&amp;#39;t usable for this bypass.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Note that Loofah&amp;#39;s default `sanitize()` path is **not** affected, because Nokogiri decodes or entity-escapes HTML entities during parsing before Loofah evaluates the URI protocol. This issue o…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-8whx-365g-h9vv</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-73491</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-73491</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: ruby-loofah, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: ruby-loofah, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: ruby-loofah, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: ruby-loofah, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: ruby-loofah, Ubuntu:26.10: ruby-loofah, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: ruby-loofah&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Loofah is a general library for manipulating and transforming HTML/XML documents and fragments, built on top of Nokogiri. From 2.25.0 until 2.25.2, Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? does not reject javascript: URIs whose scheme is split or prefixed with the HTML5 named whitespace character references &amp;amp;Tab; or &amp;amp;NewLine;. CGI.unescapeHTML leaves those references intact, so allowed_uri? reports the URL safe even though a browser decodes and strips the tab or line feed and executes the resulting javascript: URL. This issue affects only callers that pass HTML-encoded strings directly to allowed_uri?; Loofah&amp;#39;s default sanitize() path is not affected. This issue is fixed in version 2.25.2.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: ruby-loofah, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: ruby-loofah, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: ruby-loofah, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: ruby-loofah, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: ruby-loofah, Ubuntu:26.10: ruby-loofah, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: ruby-loofah&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Loofah is a general library for manipulating and transforming HTML/XML documents and fragments, built on top of Nokogiri. From 2.25.0 until 2.25.2, Loofah::HTML5::Scrub.allowed_uri? does not reject javascript: URIs whose scheme is split or prefixed with the HTML5 named whitespace character references &amp;amp;Tab; or &amp;amp;NewLine;. CGI.unescapeHTML leaves those references intact, so allowed_uri? reports the URL safe even though a browser decodes and strips the tab or line feed and executes the resulting javascript: URL. This issue affects only callers that pass HTML-encoded strings directly to allowed_uri?; Loofah&amp;#39;s default sanitize() path is not affected. This issue is fixed in version 2.25.2.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-73491</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
