<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 10:36:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-72474</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-72474</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-72474</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-353789</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-353789</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-353789</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-353789</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-72474</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-72474</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dmaengine: dma-axi-dmac: use DMA pool to manange DMA descriptor&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For architectures like Microblaze or arm64 (where this IP is used),
DMA_DIRECT_REMAP is set which means that dma_alloc_coherent() might
remap (and hence vmalloc()) some memory. This became visible in a design
where dma_direct_use_pool() is not possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With the above, when calling dma_free_coherent(), vunmap() would be
called from softirq context and thus leading to a BUG().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix it, use a dma pool that is allocated in
.device_alloc_chan_resources() and allocate blocks from it. The key
point is that now dma_pool_free() is used in axi_dmac_free_desc() to
free the blocks and that just frees the blocks from the pool in the
sense they can be used again. In other words, no actual call to
dma_free_coherent() happens. That only happens when destroying the pool
in axi_dmac_free_chan_resources() which does not happen in any interrupt
context.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dmaengine: dma-axi-dmac: use DMA pool to manange DMA descriptor&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For architectures like Microblaze or arm64 (where this IP is used),
DMA_DIRECT_REMAP is set which means that dma_alloc_coherent() might
remap (and hence vmalloc()) some memory. This became visible in a design
where dma_direct_use_pool() is not possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With the above, when calling dma_free_coherent(), vunmap() would be
called from softirq context and thus leading to a BUG().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix it, use a dma pool that is allocated in
.device_alloc_chan_resources() and allocate blocks from it. The key
point is that now dma_pool_free() is used in axi_dmac_free_desc() to
free the blocks and that just frees the blocks from the pool in the
sense they can be used again. In other words, no actual call to
dma_free_coherent() happens. That only happens when destroying the pool
in axi_dmac_free_chan_resources() which does not happen in any interrupt
context.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-72474</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-x3wp-gmcj-4wm5</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-x3wp-gmcj-4wm5</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dmaengine: dma-axi-dmac: use DMA pool to manange DMA descriptor&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For architectures like Microblaze or arm64 (where this IP is used),
DMA_DIRECT_REMAP is set which means that dma_alloc_coherent() might
remap (and hence vmalloc()) some memory. This became visible in a design
where dma_direct_use_pool() is not possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With the above, when calling dma_free_coherent(), vunmap() would be
called from softirq context and thus leading to a BUG().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix it, use a dma pool that is allocated in
.device_alloc_chan_resources() and allocate blocks from it. The key
point is that now dma_pool_free() is used in axi_dmac_free_desc() to
free the blocks and that just frees the blocks from the pool in the
sense they can be used again. In other words, no actual call to
dma_free_coherent() happens. That only happens when destroying the pool
in axi_dmac_free_chan_resources() which does not happen in any interrupt
context.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;dmaengine: dma-axi-dmac: use DMA pool to manange DMA descriptor&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For architectures like Microblaze or arm64 (where this IP is used),
DMA_DIRECT_REMAP is set which means that dma_alloc_coherent() might
remap (and hence vmalloc()) some memory. This became visible in a design
where dma_direct_use_pool() is not possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With the above, when calling dma_free_coherent(), vunmap() would be
called from softirq context and thus leading to a BUG().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To fix it, use a dma pool that is allocated in
.device_alloc_chan_resources() and allocate blocks from it. The key
point is that now dma_pool_free() is used in axi_dmac_free_desc() to
free the blocks and that just frees the blocks from the pool in the
sense they can be used again. In other words, no actual call to
dma_free_coherent() happens. That only happens when destroying the pool
in axi_dmac_free_chan_resources() which does not happen in any interrupt
context.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-x3wp-gmcj-4wm5</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-72474</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-72474</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 154 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dmaengine: dma-axi-dmac: use DMA pool to manange DMA descriptor For architectures like Microblaze or arm64 (where this IP is used), DMA_DIRECT_REMAP is set which means that dma_alloc_coherent() might remap (and hence vmalloc()) some memory. This became visible in a design where dma_direct_use_pool() is not possible. With the above, when calling dma_free_coherent(), vunmap() would be called from softirq context and thus leading to a BUG(). To fix it, use a dma pool that is allocated in .device_alloc_chan_resources() and allocate blocks from it. The key point is that now dma_pool_free() is used in axi_dmac_free_desc() to free the blocks and that just frees the blocks from the pool in the sense they can be used again. In other words, no actual call to dma_free_coherent() happens. That only happens when destroying the pool in axi_dmac_free_chan_resources() which does not happen in any interrupt context.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 154 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: dmaengine: dma-axi-dmac: use DMA pool to manange DMA descriptor For architectures like Microblaze or arm64 (where this IP is used), DMA_DIRECT_REMAP is set which means that dma_alloc_coherent() might remap (and hence vmalloc()) some memory. This became visible in a design where dma_direct_use_pool() is not possible. With the above, when calling dma_free_coherent(), vunmap() would be called from softirq context and thus leading to a BUG(). To fix it, use a dma pool that is allocated in .device_alloc_chan_resources() and allocate blocks from it. The key point is that now dma_pool_free() is used in axi_dmac_free_desc() to free the blocks and that just frees the blocks from the pool in the sense they can be used again. In other words, no actual call to dma_free_coherent() happens. That only happens when destroying the pool in axi_dmac_free_chan_resources() which does not happen in any interrupt context.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-72474</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2852 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2852</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um root Rechte zu erlangen, um einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um root Rechte zu erlangen, um einen Denial of Service herbeizuführen oder einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2852</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
