<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 15:34:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-348585</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348585</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-348585</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348585</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-70481</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-70481</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.5.0 until 0.11.0, the standard channel message update and delete handlers accepted any caller holding write access on the channel without checking that the caller wrote the message. Because write access is the same grant a member needs to post, any ordinary participant in a shared standard channel could rewrite or permanently delete another participant message, while group and direct message handlers enforced authorship. This issue is fixed in 0.11.0.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Open WebUI is an extensible, feature-rich, and user-friendly self-hosted AI platform. From 0.5.0 until 0.11.0, the standard channel message update and delete handlers accepted any caller holding write access on the channel without checking that the caller wrote the message. Because write access is the same grant a member needs to post, any ordinary participant in a shared standard channel could rewrite or permanently delete another participant message, while group and direct message handlers enforced authorship. This issue is fixed in 0.11.0.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-70481</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-mj5r-jf49-m3w7 — Open WebUI: Any member with write access to a standard channel can edit or delete other members' messages</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-mj5r-jf49-m3w7</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: open-webui&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary
On standard channels, the message update and delete handlers accepted any caller holding write access on the channel, without checking that the caller wrote the message. Write access is the same grant a member needs in order to post, so every ordinary participant in a shared channel could rewrite or permanently delete any other participant&amp;#39;s messages. The group and direct message branch of the same handlers enforced authorship; the standard branch did not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Preconditions
Channels are disabled by default and must be enabled by an administrator (`ENABLE_CHANNELS`). The channel must be a standard channel; group and direct message channels are not affected. The attacker is any authenticated account with role `user` that holds write access on the channel, whether granted publicly, per user, or through a group. No ownership of the channel, channel manager role, or elevated role is required. Channel and message ids are returned by the listing endpoints the member can already call.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact
An ordinary member could replace the content of another member&amp;#39;s message while the message stayed attributed to its original author, and could attach arbitrary `data` and `meta` payloads to it through the same form. The member could also permanently delete other members&amp;#39; messages, up to the entire visible history of the channel. This is an integrity and availability loss against other users of the channel: content can be forged under a colleague&amp;#39;s name and records can be destroyed…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: open-webui&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary
On standard channels, the message update and delete handlers accepted any caller holding write access on the channel, without checking that the caller wrote the message. Write access is the same grant a member needs in order to post, so every ordinary participant in a shared channel could rewrite or permanently delete any other participant&amp;#39;s messages. The group and direct message branch of the same handlers enforced authorship; the standard branch did not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Preconditions
Channels are disabled by default and must be enabled by an administrator (`ENABLE_CHANNELS`). The channel must be a standard channel; group and direct message channels are not affected. The attacker is any authenticated account with role `user` that holds write access on the channel, whether granted publicly, per user, or through a group. No ownership of the channel, channel manager role, or elevated role is required. Channel and message ids are returned by the listing endpoints the member can already call.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact
An ordinary member could replace the content of another member&amp;#39;s message while the message stayed attributed to its original author, and could attach arbitrary `data` and `meta` payloads to it through the same form. The member could also permanently delete other members&amp;#39; messages, up to the entire visible history of the channel. This is an integrity and availability loss against other users of the channel: content can be forged under a colleague&amp;#39;s name and records can be destroyed…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-mj5r-jf49-m3w7</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>PYSEC-2026-3649 — Open WebUI: Any member with write access to a standard channel can edit or delete other members' messages</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-3649</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: open-webui&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary
On standard channels, the message update and delete handlers accepted any caller holding write access on the channel, without checking that the caller wrote the message. Write access is the same grant a member needs in order to post, so every ordinary participant in a shared channel could rewrite or permanently delete any other participant&amp;#39;s messages. The group and direct message branch of the same handlers enforced authorship; the standard branch did not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Preconditions
Channels are disabled by default and must be enabled by an administrator (`ENABLE_CHANNELS`). The channel must be a standard channel; group and direct message channels are not affected. The attacker is any authenticated account with role `user` that holds write access on the channel, whether granted publicly, per user, or through a group. No ownership of the channel, channel manager role, or elevated role is required. Channel and message ids are returned by the listing endpoints the member can already call.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact
An ordinary member could replace the content of another member&amp;#39;s message while the message stayed attributed to its original author, and could attach arbitrary `data` and `meta` payloads to it through the same form. The member could also permanently delete other members&amp;#39; messages, up to the entire visible history of the channel. This is an integrity and availability loss against other users of the channel: content can be forged under a colleague&amp;#39;s name and records can be destroyed…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; PyPI: open-webui&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Summary
On standard channels, the message update and delete handlers accepted any caller holding write access on the channel, without checking that the caller wrote the message. Write access is the same grant a member needs in order to post, so every ordinary participant in a shared channel could rewrite or permanently delete any other participant&amp;#39;s messages. The group and direct message branch of the same handlers enforced authorship; the standard branch did not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Preconditions
Channels are disabled by default and must be enabled by an administrator (`ENABLE_CHANNELS`). The channel must be a standard channel; group and direct message channels are not affected. The attacker is any authenticated account with role `user` that holds write access on the channel, whether granted publicly, per user, or through a group. No ownership of the channel, channel manager role, or elevated role is required. Channel and message ids are returned by the listing endpoints the member can already call.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;## Impact
An ordinary member could replace the content of another member&amp;#39;s message while the message stayed attributed to its original author, and could attach arbitrary `data` and `meta` payloads to it through the same form. The member could also permanently delete other members&amp;#39; messages, up to the entire visible history of the channel. This is an integrity and availability loss against other users of the channel: content can be forged under a colleague&amp;#39;s name and records can be destroyed…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/pysec-2026-3649</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
