<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 19:28:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-68118</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-68118</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-68118</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1090 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provo…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1090</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1090</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1090</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-357834</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-357834</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-357834</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-357834</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-68118</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-68118</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SYN-RECEIVED request-socket path in tcp_check_req() accepts an
in-window RST without requiring SEG.SEQ to exactly match RCV.NXT.  A
non-exact RST therefore removes the request instead of eliciting a
challenge ACK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RFC 9293 section 3.10.7.4 applies the RFC 5961 reset check in
SYN-RECEIVED: an exact RST resets the connection, while a non-exact
in-window RST must trigger a challenge ACK and be dropped.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apply that check before the ACK-field validation, following the RFC
sequence-number, RST, then ACK processing order.  Factor the per-netns
challenge ACK quota out of tcp_send_challenge_ack() so request sockets
can share it.  Use the request socket&amp;#39;s send_ack() callback and its own
out-of-window ACK timestamp to send and rate-limit the response.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SYN-RECEIVED request-socket path in tcp_check_req() accepts an
in-window RST without requiring SEG.SEQ to exactly match RCV.NXT.  A
non-exact RST therefore removes the request instead of eliciting a
challenge ACK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RFC 9293 section 3.10.7.4 applies the RFC 5961 reset check in
SYN-RECEIVED: an exact RST resets the connection, while a non-exact
in-window RST must trigger a challenge ACK and be dropped.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apply that check before the ACK-field validation, following the RFC
sequence-number, RST, then ACK processing order.  Factor the per-netns
challenge ACK quota out of tcp_send_challenge_ack() so request sockets
can share it.  Use the request socket&amp;#39;s send_ack() callback and its own
out-of-window ACK timestamp to send and rate-limit the response.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-68118</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-wr69-pfwc-72wx</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-wr69-pfwc-72wx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SYN-RECEIVED request-socket path in tcp_check_req() accepts an
in-window RST without requiring SEG.SEQ to exactly match RCV.NXT.  A
non-exact RST therefore removes the request instead of eliciting a
challenge ACK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RFC 9293 section 3.10.7.4 applies the RFC 5961 reset check in
SYN-RECEIVED: an exact RST resets the connection, while a non-exact
in-window RST must trigger a challenge ACK and be dropped.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apply that check before the ACK-field validation, following the RFC
sequence-number, RST, then ACK processing order.  Factor the per-netns
challenge ACK quota out of tcp_send_challenge_ack() so request sockets
can share it.  Use the request socket&amp;#39;s send_ack() callback and its own
out-of-window ACK timestamp to send and rate-limit the response.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The SYN-RECEIVED request-socket path in tcp_check_req() accepts an
in-window RST without requiring SEG.SEQ to exactly match RCV.NXT.  A
non-exact RST therefore removes the request instead of eliciting a
challenge ACK.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RFC 9293 section 3.10.7.4 applies the RFC 5961 reset check in
SYN-RECEIVED: an exact RST resets the connection, while a non-exact
in-window RST must trigger a challenge ACK and be dropped.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Apply that check before the ACK-field validation, following the RFC
sequence-number, RST, then ACK processing order.  Factor the per-netns
challenge ACK quota out of tcp_send_challenge_ack() so request sockets
can share it.  Use the request socket&amp;#39;s send_ack() callback and its own
out-of-window ACK timestamp to send and rate-limit the response.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-wr69-pfwc-72wx</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-68118 — tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-68118</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-68118</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-68118</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-3707 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3707</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;seg6: separate dst_cache for input and output paths in seg6 lwtunnel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The seg6 lwtunnel uses a single dst_cache per encap route, shared
between seg6_input_core() and seg6_output_core(). These two paths
can perform the post-encap SID lookup in different routing contexts
(e.g., ip rules matching on the ingress interface, or VRF table
separation). Whichever path runs first populates the cache, and the
other reuses it blindly, bypassing its own lookup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by splitting the cache into cache_input and cache_output,
so each path maintains its own cached dst independently.(CVE-2026-31668)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RDMA/rxe: Fix iova-to-va conversion for MR page sizes != PAGE_SIZE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current implementation incorrectly handles memory regions (MRs) with
page sizes different from the system PAGE_SIZE. The core issue is that
rxe_set_page() is called with mr-&amp;amp;gt;page_size step increments, but the
page_list stores individual struct page pointers, each representing
PAGE_SIZE of memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ib_sg_to_page() has ensured that when i&amp;amp;gt;=1 either
a) SG[i-1].dma_end and SG[i].dma_addr are contiguous
or
b) SG[i-1].dma_end and SG[i].dma_addr are mr-&amp;amp;gt;page_size aligned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leads to incorrect iova-to-va conversion in scenarios:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) page_size &amp;amp;lt; PAGE_SIZE (e.g., MR: 4K, system: 64K):
   ibmr-&amp;amp;gt;iova = 0x1…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;seg6: separate dst_cache for input and output paths in seg6 lwtunnel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The seg6 lwtunnel uses a single dst_cache per encap route, shared
between seg6_input_core() and seg6_output_core(). These two paths
can perform the post-encap SID lookup in different routing contexts
(e.g., ip rules matching on the ingress interface, or VRF table
separation). Whichever path runs first populates the cache, and the
other reuses it blindly, bypassing its own lookup.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Fix this by splitting the cache into cache_input and cache_output,
so each path maintains its own cached dst independently.(CVE-2026-31668)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;RDMA/rxe: Fix iova-to-va conversion for MR page sizes != PAGE_SIZE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The current implementation incorrectly handles memory regions (MRs) with
page sizes different from the system PAGE_SIZE. The core issue is that
rxe_set_page() is called with mr-&amp;amp;gt;page_size step increments, but the
page_list stores individual struct page pointers, each representing
PAGE_SIZE of memory.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ib_sg_to_page() has ensured that when i&amp;amp;gt;=1 either
a) SG[i-1].dma_end and SG[i].dma_addr are contiguous
or
b) SG[i-1].dma_end and SG[i].dma_addr are mr-&amp;amp;gt;page_size aligned.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This leads to incorrect iova-to-va conversion in scenarios:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1) page_size &amp;amp;lt; PAGE_SIZE (e.g., MR: 4K, system: 64K):
   ibmr-&amp;amp;gt;iova = 0x1…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3707</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-68118</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-68118</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED The SYN-RECEIVED request-socket path in tcp_check_req() accepts an in-window RST without requiring SEG.SEQ to exactly match RCV.NXT.  A non-exact RST therefore removes the request instead of eliciting a challenge ACK. RFC 9293 section 3.10.7.4 applies the RFC 5961 reset check in SYN-RECEIVED: an exact RST resets the connection, while a non-exact in-window RST must trigger a challenge ACK and be dropped. Apply that check before the ACK-field validation, following the RFC sequence-number, RST, then ACK processing order.  Factor the per-netns challenge ACK quota out of tcp_send_challenge_ack() so request sockets can share it.  Use the request socket&amp;#39;s send_ack() callback and its own out-of-window ACK timestamp to send and rate-limit the response.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 246 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tcp: challenge ACK for non-exact RST in SYN-RECEIVED The SYN-RECEIVED request-socket path in tcp_check_req() accepts an in-window RST without requiring SEG.SEQ to exactly match RCV.NXT.  A non-exact RST therefore removes the request instead of eliciting a challenge ACK. RFC 9293 section 3.10.7.4 applies the RFC 5961 reset check in SYN-RECEIVED: an exact RST resets the connection, while a non-exact in-window RST must trigger a challenge ACK and be dropped. Apply that check before the ACK-field validation, following the RFC sequence-number, RST, then ACK processing order.  Factor the per-netns challenge ACK quota out of tcp_send_challenge_ack() so request sockets can share it.  Use the request socket&amp;#39;s send_ack() callback and its own out-of-window ACK timestamp to send and rate-limit the response.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-68118</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2730 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2730</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, darunter möglicherweise die Ausführung von beliebigem Code, die Ausweitung von Berechtigungen, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Manipulation von Daten oder Denial-of-Service-Zustände.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, darunter möglicherweise die Ausführung von beliebigem Code, die Ausweitung von Berechtigungen, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Manipulation von Daten oder Denial-of-Service-Zustände.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2730</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
