<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 18:57:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-344284</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344284</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-344284</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-344284</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-66402</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-66402</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions &amp;lt;= 3.28.0) contains multiple TLS certificate identity validation weaknesses in tls_verify_certificate(), tls_match_hostname(), and x509_utils_get_dns_names(). Because FreeRDP performs custom Common Name and DNS SAN string matching instead of using OpenSSL&amp;#39;s length-aware identity validation APIs, it (1) truncates DNS SAN values at embedded NUL bytes (accepting e.g. &amp;#39;victim.example\0.attacker.example&amp;#39; as &amp;#39;victim.example&amp;#39;), (2) accepts a matching Common Name even when non-matching DNS SAN entries are present, and (3) accepts IP-literal targets via DNS/CN matching without comparing iPAddress SANs. Under a trusted or misissued certificate chain, an attacker positioned to present such a certificate can bypass server identity verification, weakening TLS server authentication.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions &amp;lt;= 3.28.0) contains multiple TLS certificate identity validation weaknesses in tls_verify_certificate(), tls_match_hostname(), and x509_utils_get_dns_names(). Because FreeRDP performs custom Common Name and DNS SAN string matching instead of using OpenSSL&amp;#39;s length-aware identity validation APIs, it (1) truncates DNS SAN values at embedded NUL bytes (accepting e.g. &amp;#39;victim.example\0.attacker.example&amp;#39; as &amp;#39;victim.example&amp;#39;), (2) accepts a matching Common Name even when non-matching DNS SAN entries are present, and (3) accepts IP-literal targets via DNS/CN matching without comparing iPAddress SANs. Under a trusted or misissued certificate chain, an attacker positioned to present such a certificate can bypass server identity verification, weakening TLS server authentication.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-66402</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-759r-h698-g7xj</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-759r-h698-g7xj</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions &amp;lt;= 3.28.0) contains multiple TLS certificate identity validation weaknesses in tls_verify_certificate(), tls_match_hostname(), and x509_utils_get_dns_names(). Because FreeRDP performs custom Common Name and DNS SAN string matching instead of using OpenSSL&amp;#39;s length-aware identity validation APIs, it (1) truncates DNS SAN values at embedded NUL bytes (accepting e.g. &amp;#39;victim.example\0.attacker.example&amp;#39; as &amp;#39;victim.example&amp;#39;), (2) accepts a matching Common Name even when non-matching DNS SAN entries are present, and (3) accepts IP-literal targets via DNS/CN matching without comparing iPAddress SANs. Under a trusted or misissued certificate chain, an attacker positioned to present such a certificate can bypass server identity verification, weakening TLS server authentication.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions &amp;lt;= 3.28.0) contains multiple TLS certificate identity validation weaknesses in tls_verify_certificate(), tls_match_hostname(), and x509_utils_get_dns_names(). Because FreeRDP performs custom Common Name and DNS SAN string matching instead of using OpenSSL&amp;#39;s length-aware identity validation APIs, it (1) truncates DNS SAN values at embedded NUL bytes (accepting e.g. &amp;#39;victim.example\0.attacker.example&amp;#39; as &amp;#39;victim.example&amp;#39;), (2) accepts a matching Common Name even when non-matching DNS SAN entries are present, and (3) accepts IP-literal targets via DNS/CN matching without comparing iPAddress SANs. Under a trusted or misissued certificate chain, an attacker positioned to present such a certificate can bypass server identity verification, weakening TLS server authentication.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-759r-h698-g7xj</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-66402</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-66402</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: freerdp, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: freerdp2, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: freerdp, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: freerdp2, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: freerdp2, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: freerdp3, Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS: freerdp2, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: freerdp3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions &amp;lt;= 3.28.0) contains multiple TLS certificate identity validation weaknesses in tls_verify_certificate(), tls_match_hostname(), and x509_utils_get_dns_names(). Because FreeRDP performs custom Common Name and DNS SAN string matching instead of using OpenSSL&amp;#39;s length-aware identity validation APIs, it (1) truncates DNS SAN values at embedded NUL bytes (accepting e.g. &amp;#39;victim.example\0.attacker.example&amp;#39; as &amp;#39;victim.example&amp;#39;), (2) accepts a matching Common Name even when non-matching DNS SAN entries are present, and (3) accepts IP-literal targets via DNS/CN matching without comparing iPAddress SANs. Under a trusted or misissued certificate chain, an attacker positioned to present such a certificate can bypass server identity verification, weakening TLS server authentication.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: freerdp, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: freerdp2, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: freerdp, Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS: freerdp2, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: freerdp2, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: freerdp3, Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS: freerdp2, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: freerdp3&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FreeRDP before 3.29.0 (affected versions &amp;lt;= 3.28.0) contains multiple TLS certificate identity validation weaknesses in tls_verify_certificate(), tls_match_hostname(), and x509_utils_get_dns_names(). Because FreeRDP performs custom Common Name and DNS SAN string matching instead of using OpenSSL&amp;#39;s length-aware identity validation APIs, it (1) truncates DNS SAN values at embedded NUL bytes (accepting e.g. &amp;#39;victim.example\0.attacker.example&amp;#39; as &amp;#39;victim.example&amp;#39;), (2) accepts a matching Common Name even when non-matching DNS SAN entries are present, and (3) accepts IP-literal targets via DNS/CN matching without comparing iPAddress SANs. Under a trusted or misissued certificate chain, an attacker positioned to present such a certificate can bypass server identity verification, weakening TLS server authentication.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-66402</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2384 — FreeRDP: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2384</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in FreeRDP ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Daten zu manipulieren oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in FreeRDP ausnutzen, um beliebigen Programmcode auszuführen, Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen, Daten zu manipulieren oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand auszulösen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2384</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
