<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 10:14:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-64232</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64232</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64232</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0954 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0954</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0954</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0954</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-348452</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348452</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-348452</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348452</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-64232</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64232</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;block: recompute nr_integrity_segments in blk_insert_cloned_request&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;blk_insert_cloned_request() already recomputes nr_phys_segments
against the bottom queue, because &amp;#34;the queue settings related to
segment counting may differ from the original queue.&amp;#34; The exact same
reasoning applies to integrity segments: a stacked driver&amp;#39;s underlying
queue can have tighter virt_boundary_mask, seg_boundary_mask, or
max_segment_size than the top queue, in which case
blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() against the bottom queue produces a
different count than the cached rq-&amp;gt;nr_integrity_segments inherited
from the source request by blk_rq_prep_clone().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the cached count is lower than the bottom queue&amp;#39;s actual count,
blk_rq_map_integrity_sg() trips&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG_ON(segments &amp;gt; rq-&amp;gt;nr_integrity_segments);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;on dispatch. The same families of stacked setups that motivated the
existing nr_phys_segments recompute -- dm-multipath fanning out to
nvme-rdma in particular -- can produce this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mirror the nr_phys_segments handling: when the request carries
integrity, recompute nr_integrity_segments against the bottom queue
and reject the request if it exceeds the bottom queue&amp;#39;s
max_integrity_segments. blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() and
queue_max_integrity_segments() are both already available via
&amp;lt;linux/blk-integrity.h&amp;gt;, which blk-mq.c includes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This closes a latent gap in the stacking contract and brings the
integrity-segment accounting in line with t…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;block: recompute nr_integrity_segments in blk_insert_cloned_request&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;blk_insert_cloned_request() already recomputes nr_phys_segments
against the bottom queue, because &amp;#34;the queue settings related to
segment counting may differ from the original queue.&amp;#34; The exact same
reasoning applies to integrity segments: a stacked driver&amp;#39;s underlying
queue can have tighter virt_boundary_mask, seg_boundary_mask, or
max_segment_size than the top queue, in which case
blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() against the bottom queue produces a
different count than the cached rq-&amp;gt;nr_integrity_segments inherited
from the source request by blk_rq_prep_clone().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the cached count is lower than the bottom queue&amp;#39;s actual count,
blk_rq_map_integrity_sg() trips&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG_ON(segments &amp;gt; rq-&amp;gt;nr_integrity_segments);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;on dispatch. The same families of stacked setups that motivated the
existing nr_phys_segments recompute -- dm-multipath fanning out to
nvme-rdma in particular -- can produce this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mirror the nr_phys_segments handling: when the request carries
integrity, recompute nr_integrity_segments against the bottom queue
and reject the request if it exceeds the bottom queue&amp;#39;s
max_integrity_segments. blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() and
queue_max_integrity_segments() are both already available via
&amp;lt;linux/blk-integrity.h&amp;gt;, which blk-mq.c includes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This closes a latent gap in the stacking contract and brings the
integrity-segment accounting in line with t…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64232</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-g8pp-85q4-6cgq</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g8pp-85q4-6cgq</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;block: recompute nr_integrity_segments in blk_insert_cloned_request&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;blk_insert_cloned_request() already recomputes nr_phys_segments
against the bottom queue, because &amp;#34;the queue settings related to
segment counting may differ from the original queue.&amp;#34; The exact same
reasoning applies to integrity segments: a stacked driver&amp;#39;s underlying
queue can have tighter virt_boundary_mask, seg_boundary_mask, or
max_segment_size than the top queue, in which case
blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() against the bottom queue produces a
different count than the cached rq-&amp;gt;nr_integrity_segments inherited
from the source request by blk_rq_prep_clone().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the cached count is lower than the bottom queue&amp;#39;s actual count,
blk_rq_map_integrity_sg() trips&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG_ON(segments &amp;gt; rq-&amp;gt;nr_integrity_segments);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;on dispatch. The same families of stacked setups that motivated the
existing nr_phys_segments recompute -- dm-multipath fanning out to
nvme-rdma in particular -- can produce this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mirror the nr_phys_segments handling: when the request carries
integrity, recompute nr_integrity_segments against the bottom queue
and reject the request if it exceeds the bottom queue&amp;#39;s
max_integrity_segments. blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() and
queue_max_integrity_segments() are both already available via
&amp;lt;linux/blk-integrity.h&amp;gt;, which blk-mq.c includes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This closes a latent gap in the stacking contract and brings the
integrity-segment accounting in line with t…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;block: recompute nr_integrity_segments in blk_insert_cloned_request&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;blk_insert_cloned_request() already recomputes nr_phys_segments
against the bottom queue, because &amp;#34;the queue settings related to
segment counting may differ from the original queue.&amp;#34; The exact same
reasoning applies to integrity segments: a stacked driver&amp;#39;s underlying
queue can have tighter virt_boundary_mask, seg_boundary_mask, or
max_segment_size than the top queue, in which case
blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() against the bottom queue produces a
different count than the cached rq-&amp;gt;nr_integrity_segments inherited
from the source request by blk_rq_prep_clone().&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the cached count is lower than the bottom queue&amp;#39;s actual count,
blk_rq_map_integrity_sg() trips&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;BUG_ON(segments &amp;gt; rq-&amp;gt;nr_integrity_segments);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;on dispatch. The same families of stacked setups that motivated the
existing nr_phys_segments recompute -- dm-multipath fanning out to
nvme-rdma in particular -- can produce this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mirror the nr_phys_segments handling: when the request carries
integrity, recompute nr_integrity_segments against the bottom queue
and reject the request if it exceeds the bottom queue&amp;#39;s
max_integrity_segments. blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() and
queue_max_integrity_segments() are both already available via
&amp;lt;linux/blk-integrity.h&amp;gt;, which blk-mq.c includes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This closes a latent gap in the stacking contract and brings the
integrity-segment accounting in line with t…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g8pp-85q4-6cgq</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:21910-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21910-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21910-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:23881-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23881-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23881-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-64232</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64232</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 118 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: recompute nr_integrity_segments in blk_insert_cloned_request blk_insert_cloned_request() already recomputes nr_phys_segments against the bottom queue, because &amp;#34;the queue settings related to segment counting may differ from the original queue.&amp;#34; The exact same reasoning applies to integrity segments: a stacked driver&amp;#39;s underlying queue can have tighter virt_boundary_mask, seg_boundary_mask, or max_segment_size than the top queue, in which case blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() against the bottom queue produces a different count than the cached rq-&amp;gt;nr_integrity_segments inherited from the source request by blk_rq_prep_clone(). When the cached count is lower than the bottom queue&amp;#39;s actual count, blk_rq_map_integrity_sg() trips 	BUG_ON(segments &amp;gt; rq-&amp;gt;nr_integrity_segments); on dispatch. The same families of stacked setups that motivated the existing nr_phys_segments recompute -- dm-multipath fanning out to nvme-rdma in particular -- can produce this. Mirror the nr_phys_segments handling: when the request carries integrity, recompute nr_integrity_segments against the bottom queue and reject the request if it exceeds the bottom queue&amp;#39;s max_integrity_segments. blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() and queue_max_integrity_segments() are both already available via &amp;lt;linux/blk-integrity.h&amp;gt;, which blk-mq.c includes. This closes a latent gap in the stacking contract and brings the integrity-segment accounting in line with the exis…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 118 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: block: recompute nr_integrity_segments in blk_insert_cloned_request blk_insert_cloned_request() already recomputes nr_phys_segments against the bottom queue, because &amp;#34;the queue settings related to segment counting may differ from the original queue.&amp;#34; The exact same reasoning applies to integrity segments: a stacked driver&amp;#39;s underlying queue can have tighter virt_boundary_mask, seg_boundary_mask, or max_segment_size than the top queue, in which case blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() against the bottom queue produces a different count than the cached rq-&amp;gt;nr_integrity_segments inherited from the source request by blk_rq_prep_clone(). When the cached count is lower than the bottom queue&amp;#39;s actual count, blk_rq_map_integrity_sg() trips 	BUG_ON(segments &amp;gt; rq-&amp;gt;nr_integrity_segments); on dispatch. The same families of stacked setups that motivated the existing nr_phys_segments recompute -- dm-multipath fanning out to nvme-rdma in particular -- can produce this. Mirror the nr_phys_segments handling: when the request carries integrity, recompute nr_integrity_segments against the bottom queue and reject the request if it exceeds the bottom queue&amp;#39;s max_integrity_segments. blk_rq_count_integrity_sg() and queue_max_integrity_segments() are both already available via &amp;lt;linux/blk-integrity.h&amp;gt;, which blk-mq.c includes. This closes a latent gap in the stacking contract and brings the integrity-segment accounting in line with the exis…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64232</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2527 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2527</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, dazu können DoS-Angriffe, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Beschädigung des Speichers oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gehören.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um nicht näher spezifizierte Angriffe durchzuführen, dazu können DoS-Angriffe, die Offenlegung von Informationen, die Beschädigung des Speichers oder die Umgehung von Sicherheitsmaßnahmen gehören.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
