<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 21:15:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-14280</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-14280</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-14280</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-14280</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-64177</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64177</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64177</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0926 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0926</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0926</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0926</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-338790</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-338790</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-338790</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-338790</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-64177</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64177</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;phonet/pep: disable BH around forwarded sk_receive_skb()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The networking receive path is usually run from softirq context, but
protocols that take the socket lock may have packets stored in the
backlog and processed later from process context. In that case
release_sock() -&amp;gt; __release_sock() drops the slock with spin_unlock_bh()
and then calls sk-&amp;gt;sk_backlog_rcv() with bottom halves enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Typical sk_backlog_rcv handlers process the socket whose backlog is
being drained, so the BH state at entry is irrelevant for the slocks
they touch. pep_do_rcv() is different: when the inbound skb targets an
existing PEP pipe, it forwards the skb to a different *child* socket
via sk_receive_skb(). That helper takes the child slock with
bh_lock_sock_nested(), which is just spin_lock_nested() and assumes BH
is already off. The same child slock therefore ends up acquired with
BH on (process path) and with BH off (softirq path):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;process context                   softirq context
  ---------------                   ---------------
  release_sock(listener)            __netif_receive_skb()
   __release_sock()                  phonet_rcv()
    spin_unlock_bh()                  __sk_receive_skb(listener)
    [BH now ENABLED]                  [BH already disabled]
    sk_backlog_rcv:                   sk_backlog_rcv:
     pep_do_rcv()                      pep_do_rcv()
      sk_receive_skb(child)             sk_receive_skb(child…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;phonet/pep: disable BH around forwarded sk_receive_skb()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The networking receive path is usually run from softirq context, but
protocols that take the socket lock may have packets stored in the
backlog and processed later from process context. In that case
release_sock() -&amp;gt; __release_sock() drops the slock with spin_unlock_bh()
and then calls sk-&amp;gt;sk_backlog_rcv() with bottom halves enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Typical sk_backlog_rcv handlers process the socket whose backlog is
being drained, so the BH state at entry is irrelevant for the slocks
they touch. pep_do_rcv() is different: when the inbound skb targets an
existing PEP pipe, it forwards the skb to a different *child* socket
via sk_receive_skb(). That helper takes the child slock with
bh_lock_sock_nested(), which is just spin_lock_nested() and assumes BH
is already off. The same child slock therefore ends up acquired with
BH on (process path) and with BH off (softirq path):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;process context                   softirq context
  ---------------                   ---------------
  release_sock(listener)            __netif_receive_skb()
   __release_sock()                  phonet_rcv()
    spin_unlock_bh()                  __sk_receive_skb(listener)
    [BH now ENABLED]                  [BH already disabled]
    sk_backlog_rcv:                   sk_backlog_rcv:
     pep_do_rcv()                      pep_do_rcv()
      sk_receive_skb(child)             sk_receive_skb(child…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64177</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-g3fg-4885-2jhq</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g3fg-4885-2jhq</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;phonet/pep: disable BH around forwarded sk_receive_skb()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The networking receive path is usually run from softirq context, but
protocols that take the socket lock may have packets stored in the
backlog and processed later from process context. In that case
release_sock() -&amp;gt; __release_sock() drops the slock with spin_unlock_bh()
and then calls sk-&amp;gt;sk_backlog_rcv() with bottom halves enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Typical sk_backlog_rcv handlers process the socket whose backlog is
being drained, so the BH state at entry is irrelevant for the slocks
they touch. pep_do_rcv() is different: when the inbound skb targets an
existing PEP pipe, it forwards the skb to a different *child* socket
via sk_receive_skb(). That helper takes the child slock with
bh_lock_sock_nested(), which is just spin_lock_nested() and assumes BH
is already off. The same child slock therefore ends up acquired with
BH on (process path) and with BH off (softirq path):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;process context                   softirq context
  ---------------                   ---------------
  release_sock(listener)            __netif_receive_skb()
   __release_sock()                  phonet_rcv()
    spin_unlock_bh()                  __sk_receive_skb(listener)
    [BH now ENABLED]                  [BH already disabled]
    sk_backlog_rcv:                   sk_backlog_rcv:
     pep_do_rcv()                      pep_do_rcv()
      sk_receive_skb(child)             sk_receive_skb(child…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;phonet/pep: disable BH around forwarded sk_receive_skb()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The networking receive path is usually run from softirq context, but
protocols that take the socket lock may have packets stored in the
backlog and processed later from process context. In that case
release_sock() -&amp;gt; __release_sock() drops the slock with spin_unlock_bh()
and then calls sk-&amp;gt;sk_backlog_rcv() with bottom halves enabled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Typical sk_backlog_rcv handlers process the socket whose backlog is
being drained, so the BH state at entry is irrelevant for the slocks
they touch. pep_do_rcv() is different: when the inbound skb targets an
existing PEP pipe, it forwards the skb to a different *child* socket
via sk_receive_skb(). That helper takes the child slock with
bh_lock_sock_nested(), which is just spin_lock_nested() and assumes BH
is already off. The same child slock therefore ends up acquired with
BH on (process path) and with BH off (softirq path):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;process context                   softirq context
  ---------------                   ---------------
  release_sock(listener)            __netif_receive_skb()
   __release_sock()                  phonet_rcv()
    spin_unlock_bh()                  __sk_receive_skb(listener)
    [BH now ENABLED]                  [BH already disabled]
    sk_backlog_rcv:                   sk_backlog_rcv:
     pep_do_rcv()                      pep_do_rcv()
      sk_receive_skb(child)             sk_receive_skb(child…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g3fg-4885-2jhq</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:21910-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21910-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21910-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:23881-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23881-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23881-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-64177</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64177</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 245 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: phonet/pep: disable BH around forwarded sk_receive_skb() The networking receive path is usually run from softirq context, but protocols that take the socket lock may have packets stored in the backlog and processed later from process context. In that case release_sock() -&amp;gt; __release_sock() drops the slock with spin_unlock_bh() and then calls sk-&amp;gt;sk_backlog_rcv() with bottom halves enabled. Typical sk_backlog_rcv handlers process the socket whose backlog is being drained, so the BH state at entry is irrelevant for the slocks they touch. pep_do_rcv() is different: when the inbound skb targets an existing PEP pipe, it forwards the skb to a different *child* socket via sk_receive_skb(). That helper takes the child slock with bh_lock_sock_nested(), which is just spin_lock_nested() and assumes BH is already off. The same child slock therefore ends up acquired with BH on (process path) and with BH off (softirq path):   process context                   softirq context   ---------------                   ---------------   release_sock(listener)            __netif_receive_skb()    __release_sock()                  phonet_rcv()     spin_unlock_bh()                  __sk_receive_skb(listener)     [BH now ENABLED]                  [BH already disabled]     sk_backlog_rcv:                   sk_backlog_rcv:      pep_do_rcv()                      pep_do_rcv()       sk_receive_skb(child)             sk_receive_skb(child)…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe and 245 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: phonet/pep: disable BH around forwarded sk_receive_skb() The networking receive path is usually run from softirq context, but protocols that take the socket lock may have packets stored in the backlog and processed later from process context. In that case release_sock() -&amp;gt; __release_sock() drops the slock with spin_unlock_bh() and then calls sk-&amp;gt;sk_backlog_rcv() with bottom halves enabled. Typical sk_backlog_rcv handlers process the socket whose backlog is being drained, so the BH state at entry is irrelevant for the slocks they touch. pep_do_rcv() is different: when the inbound skb targets an existing PEP pipe, it forwards the skb to a different *child* socket via sk_receive_skb(). That helper takes the child slock with bh_lock_sock_nested(), which is just spin_lock_nested() and assumes BH is already off. The same child slock therefore ends up acquired with BH on (process path) and with BH off (softirq path):   process context                   softirq context   ---------------                   ---------------   release_sock(listener)            __netif_receive_skb()    __release_sock()                  phonet_rcv()     spin_unlock_bh()                  __sk_receive_skb(listener)     [BH now ENABLED]                  [BH already disabled]     sk_backlog_rcv:                   sk_backlog_rcv:      pep_do_rcv()                      pep_do_rcv()       sk_receive_skb(child)             sk_receive_skb(child)…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64177</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2403 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2403</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
