<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 22:03:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-64109</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64109</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64109</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0926 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0926</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0926</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0926</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-348407</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348407</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-348407</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348407</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-64109</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64109</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;af_unix: Fix UAF read of tail-&amp;gt;len in unix_stream_data_wait()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;unix_stream_data_wait() does skb_peek_tail(&amp;amp;sk-&amp;gt;sk_receive_queue) without
holding any lock that prevents SKBs on that queue from being dequeued and
freed.
This has been the case since commit 79f632c71bea (&amp;#34;unix/stream: fix
peeking with an offset larger than data in queue&amp;#34;).
The first consequence of this is that the pointer comparison
`tail != last` can be false even if `last` semantically refers to an
already-freed SKB while `tail` is a new SKB allocated at the same address;
which can cause unix_stream_data_wait() to wrongly keep blocking after new
data has arrived, but only in a weird scenario where a peeking recv() and
a normal recv() on the same socket are racing, which is probably not a
real problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But since commit 2b514574f7e8 (&amp;#34;net: af_unix: implement splice for stream
af_unix sockets&amp;#34;), `tail` is actually dereferenced, which can cause UAF in
the following race scenario (where test_setup() runs single-threaded,
and afterwards, test_thread1() and test_thread2() run concurrently in
two threads:
```
static int socks[2];
void test_setup(void) {
  socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, socks);
  send(socks[1], &amp;#34;A&amp;#34;, 1, 0);
  int peekoff = 1;
  setsockopt(socks[0], SOL_SOCKET, SO_PEEK_OFF, &amp;amp;peekoff, sizeof(peekoff));
}
void test_thread1(void) {
  char dummy;
  recv(socks[0], &amp;amp;dummy, 1, MSG_PEEK);
}
void test_thread2(void) {
  char dummy;
  recv(s…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;af_unix: Fix UAF read of tail-&amp;gt;len in unix_stream_data_wait()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;unix_stream_data_wait() does skb_peek_tail(&amp;amp;sk-&amp;gt;sk_receive_queue) without
holding any lock that prevents SKBs on that queue from being dequeued and
freed.
This has been the case since commit 79f632c71bea (&amp;#34;unix/stream: fix
peeking with an offset larger than data in queue&amp;#34;).
The first consequence of this is that the pointer comparison
`tail != last` can be false even if `last` semantically refers to an
already-freed SKB while `tail` is a new SKB allocated at the same address;
which can cause unix_stream_data_wait() to wrongly keep blocking after new
data has arrived, but only in a weird scenario where a peeking recv() and
a normal recv() on the same socket are racing, which is probably not a
real problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But since commit 2b514574f7e8 (&amp;#34;net: af_unix: implement splice for stream
af_unix sockets&amp;#34;), `tail` is actually dereferenced, which can cause UAF in
the following race scenario (where test_setup() runs single-threaded,
and afterwards, test_thread1() and test_thread2() run concurrently in
two threads:
```
static int socks[2];
void test_setup(void) {
  socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, socks);
  send(socks[1], &amp;#34;A&amp;#34;, 1, 0);
  int peekoff = 1;
  setsockopt(socks[0], SOL_SOCKET, SO_PEEK_OFF, &amp;amp;peekoff, sizeof(peekoff));
}
void test_thread1(void) {
  char dummy;
  recv(socks[0], &amp;amp;dummy, 1, MSG_PEEK);
}
void test_thread2(void) {
  char dummy;
  recv(s…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64109</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-mh36-g5h5-fxqc</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-mh36-g5h5-fxqc</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;af_unix: Fix UAF read of tail-&amp;gt;len in unix_stream_data_wait()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;unix_stream_data_wait() does skb_peek_tail(&amp;amp;sk-&amp;gt;sk_receive_queue) without
holding any lock that prevents SKBs on that queue from being dequeued and
freed.
This has been the case since commit 79f632c71bea (&amp;#34;unix/stream: fix
peeking with an offset larger than data in queue&amp;#34;).
The first consequence of this is that the pointer comparison
`tail != last` can be false even if `last` semantically refers to an
already-freed SKB while `tail` is a new SKB allocated at the same address;
which can cause unix_stream_data_wait() to wrongly keep blocking after new
data has arrived, but only in a weird scenario where a peeking recv() and
a normal recv() on the same socket are racing, which is probably not a
real problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But since commit 2b514574f7e8 (&amp;#34;net: af_unix: implement splice for stream
af_unix sockets&amp;#34;), `tail` is actually dereferenced, which can cause UAF in
the following race scenario (where test_setup() runs single-threaded,
and afterwards, test_thread1() and test_thread2() run concurrently in
two threads:
```
static int socks[2];
void test_setup(void) {
  socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, socks);
  send(socks[1], &amp;#34;A&amp;#34;, 1, 0);
  int peekoff = 1;
  setsockopt(socks[0], SOL_SOCKET, SO_PEEK_OFF, &amp;amp;peekoff, sizeof(peekoff));
}
void test_thread1(void) {
  char dummy;
  recv(socks[0], &amp;amp;dummy, 1, MSG_PEEK);
}
void test_thread2(void) {
  char dummy;
  recv(s…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;af_unix: Fix UAF read of tail-&amp;gt;len in unix_stream_data_wait()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;unix_stream_data_wait() does skb_peek_tail(&amp;amp;sk-&amp;gt;sk_receive_queue) without
holding any lock that prevents SKBs on that queue from being dequeued and
freed.
This has been the case since commit 79f632c71bea (&amp;#34;unix/stream: fix
peeking with an offset larger than data in queue&amp;#34;).
The first consequence of this is that the pointer comparison
`tail != last` can be false even if `last` semantically refers to an
already-freed SKB while `tail` is a new SKB allocated at the same address;
which can cause unix_stream_data_wait() to wrongly keep blocking after new
data has arrived, but only in a weird scenario where a peeking recv() and
a normal recv() on the same socket are racing, which is probably not a
real problem.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But since commit 2b514574f7e8 (&amp;#34;net: af_unix: implement splice for stream
af_unix sockets&amp;#34;), `tail` is actually dereferenced, which can cause UAF in
the following race scenario (where test_setup() runs single-threaded,
and afterwards, test_thread1() and test_thread2() run concurrently in
two threads:
```
static int socks[2];
void test_setup(void) {
  socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, socks);
  send(socks[1], &amp;#34;A&amp;#34;, 1, 0);
  int peekoff = 1;
  setsockopt(socks[0], SOL_SOCKET, SO_PEEK_OFF, &amp;amp;peekoff, sizeof(peekoff));
}
void test_thread1(void) {
  char dummy;
  recv(socks[0], &amp;amp;dummy, 1, MSG_PEEK);
}
void test_thread2(void) {
  char dummy;
  recv(s…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-mh36-g5h5-fxqc</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-3704 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3704</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: hns3: add VLAN id validation before using&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, the VLAN id may be used without validation when
receive a VLAN configuration mailbox from VF. The length of
vlan_del_fail_bmap is BITS_TO_LONGS(VLAN_N_VID). It may cause
out-of-bounds memory access once the VLAN id is bigger than
or equal to VLAN_N_VID.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Therefore, VLAN id needs to be checked to ensure it is within
the range of VLAN_N_VID.(CVE-2025-71112)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4: fix string copying in parse_apply_sb_mount_options()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;strscpy_pad() can&amp;amp;apos;t be used to copy a non-NUL-term string into a NUL-term
string of possibly bigger size.  Commit 0efc5990bca5 (&amp;amp;quot;string.h: Introduce
memtostr() and memtostr_pad()&amp;amp;quot;) provides additional information in that
regard.  So if this happens, the following warning is observed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;strnlen: detected buffer overflow: 65 byte read of buffer size 64
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 28655 at lib/string_helpers.c:1032 __fortify_report+0x96/0xc0 lib/string_helpers.c:1032
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 28655 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.12.54-syzkaller-00144-g5f0270f1ba00 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__fortify_report+0x96/0xc0 lib/string_helpers.c:1032
Call Trace:
 &amp;amp;lt;TASK&amp;amp;gt;
 __fortify_panic+0x1f/0x30 lib/s…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: hns3: add VLAN id validation before using&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, the VLAN id may be used without validation when
receive a VLAN configuration mailbox from VF. The length of
vlan_del_fail_bmap is BITS_TO_LONGS(VLAN_N_VID). It may cause
out-of-bounds memory access once the VLAN id is bigger than
or equal to VLAN_N_VID.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Therefore, VLAN id needs to be checked to ensure it is within
the range of VLAN_N_VID.(CVE-2025-71112)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4: fix string copying in parse_apply_sb_mount_options()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;strscpy_pad() can&amp;amp;apos;t be used to copy a non-NUL-term string into a NUL-term
string of possibly bigger size.  Commit 0efc5990bca5 (&amp;amp;quot;string.h: Introduce
memtostr() and memtostr_pad()&amp;amp;quot;) provides additional information in that
regard.  So if this happens, the following warning is observed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;strnlen: detected buffer overflow: 65 byte read of buffer size 64
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 28655 at lib/string_helpers.c:1032 __fortify_report+0x96/0xc0 lib/string_helpers.c:1032
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 28655 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.12.54-syzkaller-00144-g5f0270f1ba00 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__fortify_report+0x96/0xc0 lib/string_helpers.c:1032
Call Trace:
 &amp;amp;lt;TASK&amp;amp;gt;
 __fortify_panic+0x1f/0x30 lib/s…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3704</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:21910-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21910-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21910-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:23477-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23477-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23477-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-64109</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64109</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge and 244 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Fix UAF read of tail-&amp;gt;len in unix_stream_data_wait() unix_stream_data_wait() does skb_peek_tail(&amp;amp;sk-&amp;gt;sk_receive_queue) without holding any lock that prevents SKBs on that queue from being dequeued and freed. This has been the case since commit 79f632c71bea (&amp;#34;unix/stream: fix peeking with an offset larger than data in queue&amp;#34;). The first consequence of this is that the pointer comparison `tail != last` can be false even if `last` semantically refers to an already-freed SKB while `tail` is a new SKB allocated at the same address; which can cause unix_stream_data_wait() to wrongly keep blocking after new data has arrived, but only in a weird scenario where a peeking recv() and a normal recv() on the same socket are racing, which is probably not a real problem. But since commit 2b514574f7e8 (&amp;#34;net: af_unix: implement splice for stream af_unix sockets&amp;#34;), `tail` is actually dereferenced, which can cause UAF in the following race scenario (where test_setup() runs single-threaded, and afterwards, test_thread1() and test_thread2() run concurrently in two threads: ``` static int socks[2]; void test_setup(void) {   socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, socks);   send(socks[1], &amp;#34;A&amp;#34;, 1, 0);   int peekoff = 1;   setsockopt(socks[0], SOL_SOCKET, SO_PEEK_OFF, &amp;amp;peekoff, sizeof(peekoff)); } void test_thread1(void) {   char dummy;   recv(socks[0], &amp;amp;dummy, 1, MSG_PEEK); } void test_thread2(void) {   char dummy;   recv(sock…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge and 244 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: af_unix: Fix UAF read of tail-&amp;gt;len in unix_stream_data_wait() unix_stream_data_wait() does skb_peek_tail(&amp;amp;sk-&amp;gt;sk_receive_queue) without holding any lock that prevents SKBs on that queue from being dequeued and freed. This has been the case since commit 79f632c71bea (&amp;#34;unix/stream: fix peeking with an offset larger than data in queue&amp;#34;). The first consequence of this is that the pointer comparison `tail != last` can be false even if `last` semantically refers to an already-freed SKB while `tail` is a new SKB allocated at the same address; which can cause unix_stream_data_wait() to wrongly keep blocking after new data has arrived, but only in a weird scenario where a peeking recv() and a normal recv() on the same socket are racing, which is probably not a real problem. But since commit 2b514574f7e8 (&amp;#34;net: af_unix: implement splice for stream af_unix sockets&amp;#34;), `tail` is actually dereferenced, which can cause UAF in the following race scenario (where test_setup() runs single-threaded, and afterwards, test_thread1() and test_thread2() run concurrently in two threads: ``` static int socks[2]; void test_setup(void) {   socketpair(AF_UNIX, SOCK_STREAM, 0, socks);   send(socks[1], &amp;#34;A&amp;#34;, 1, 0);   int peekoff = 1;   setsockopt(socks[0], SOL_SOCKET, SO_PEEK_OFF, &amp;amp;peekoff, sizeof(peekoff)); } void test_thread1(void) {   char dummy;   recv(socks[0], &amp;amp;dummy, 1, MSG_PEEK); } void test_thread2(void) {   char dummy;   recv(sock…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64109</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2403 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2403</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
