<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 22:38:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-14401</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-14401</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-14401</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-14401</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-64046</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64046</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-64046</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0926 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0926</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0926</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0926</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-348373</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348373</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-348373</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348373</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-64046</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64046</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: tls: prevent chain-after-chain in plain text SG&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sashiko points out that if end = 0 (start != 0) the current
code will create a chain link to content type right after
the wrap link:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This would create a chain where the wrap link points directly
  to another chain link. The scatterlist API sg_next iterator
  does not recursively resolve consecutive chain links.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;meaning this is illegal input to crypto.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The wrapping link is unnecessary if end = 0. end is the entry after
the last one used so end = 0 means there&amp;#39;s nothing pushed after
the wrap:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;end         start            i
    v            v              v
  [   ]...[   ][ d ][ d ][ d ][ d ][rsv for wrap]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skip the wrapping in this case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TLS 1.3 can use the &amp;#34;wrapping slot&amp;#34; for it&amp;#39;s chaining if end = 0.
This avoids the chain-after-chain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move the wrap chaining before marking END and chaining off content
type, that feels like more logical ordering to me, but should not
matter from functional perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: tls: prevent chain-after-chain in plain text SG&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sashiko points out that if end = 0 (start != 0) the current
code will create a chain link to content type right after
the wrap link:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This would create a chain where the wrap link points directly
  to another chain link. The scatterlist API sg_next iterator
  does not recursively resolve consecutive chain links.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;meaning this is illegal input to crypto.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The wrapping link is unnecessary if end = 0. end is the entry after
the last one used so end = 0 means there&amp;#39;s nothing pushed after
the wrap:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;end         start            i
    v            v              v
  [   ]...[   ][ d ][ d ][ d ][ d ][rsv for wrap]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skip the wrapping in this case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TLS 1.3 can use the &amp;#34;wrapping slot&amp;#34; for it&amp;#39;s chaining if end = 0.
This avoids the chain-after-chain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move the wrap chaining before marking END and chaining off content
type, that feels like more logical ordering to me, but should not
matter from functional perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-64046</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-3mwm-pxvj-5v4x</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3mwm-pxvj-5v4x</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: tls: prevent chain-after-chain in plain text SG&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sashiko points out that if end = 0 (start != 0) the current
code will create a chain link to content type right after
the wrap link:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This would create a chain where the wrap link points directly
  to another chain link. The scatterlist API sg_next iterator
  does not recursively resolve consecutive chain links.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;meaning this is illegal input to crypto.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The wrapping link is unnecessary if end = 0. end is the entry after
the last one used so end = 0 means there&amp;#39;s nothing pushed after
the wrap:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;end         start            i
    v            v              v
  [   ]...[   ][ d ][ d ][ d ][ d ][rsv for wrap]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skip the wrapping in this case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TLS 1.3 can use the &amp;#34;wrapping slot&amp;#34; for it&amp;#39;s chaining if end = 0.
This avoids the chain-after-chain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move the wrap chaining before marking END and chaining off content
type, that feels like more logical ordering to me, but should not
matter from functional perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: tls: prevent chain-after-chain in plain text SG&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sashiko points out that if end = 0 (start != 0) the current
code will create a chain link to content type right after
the wrap link:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This would create a chain where the wrap link points directly
  to another chain link. The scatterlist API sg_next iterator
  does not recursively resolve consecutive chain links.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;meaning this is illegal input to crypto.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The wrapping link is unnecessary if end = 0. end is the entry after
the last one used so end = 0 means there&amp;#39;s nothing pushed after
the wrap:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;end         start            i
    v            v              v
  [   ]...[   ][ d ][ d ][ d ][ d ][rsv for wrap]&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Skip the wrapping in this case.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TLS 1.3 can use the &amp;#34;wrapping slot&amp;#34; for it&amp;#39;s chaining if end = 0.
This avoids the chain-after-chain.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Move the wrap chaining before marking END and chaining off content
type, that feels like more logical ordering to me, but should not
matter from functional perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-3mwm-pxvj-5v4x</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-3704 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3704</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: hns3: add VLAN id validation before using&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, the VLAN id may be used without validation when
receive a VLAN configuration mailbox from VF. The length of
vlan_del_fail_bmap is BITS_TO_LONGS(VLAN_N_VID). It may cause
out-of-bounds memory access once the VLAN id is bigger than
or equal to VLAN_N_VID.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Therefore, VLAN id needs to be checked to ensure it is within
the range of VLAN_N_VID.(CVE-2025-71112)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4: fix string copying in parse_apply_sb_mount_options()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;strscpy_pad() can&amp;amp;apos;t be used to copy a non-NUL-term string into a NUL-term
string of possibly bigger size.  Commit 0efc5990bca5 (&amp;amp;quot;string.h: Introduce
memtostr() and memtostr_pad()&amp;amp;quot;) provides additional information in that
regard.  So if this happens, the following warning is observed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;strnlen: detected buffer overflow: 65 byte read of buffer size 64
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 28655 at lib/string_helpers.c:1032 __fortify_report+0x96/0xc0 lib/string_helpers.c:1032
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 28655 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.12.54-syzkaller-00144-g5f0270f1ba00 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__fortify_report+0x96/0xc0 lib/string_helpers.c:1032
Call Trace:
 &amp;amp;lt;TASK&amp;amp;gt;
 __fortify_panic+0x1f/0x30 lib/s…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;net: hns3: add VLAN id validation before using&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Currently, the VLAN id may be used without validation when
receive a VLAN configuration mailbox from VF. The length of
vlan_del_fail_bmap is BITS_TO_LONGS(VLAN_N_VID). It may cause
out-of-bounds memory access once the VLAN id is bigger than
or equal to VLAN_N_VID.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Therefore, VLAN id needs to be checked to ensure it is within
the range of VLAN_N_VID.(CVE-2025-71112)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;ext4: fix string copying in parse_apply_sb_mount_options()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;strscpy_pad() can&amp;amp;apos;t be used to copy a non-NUL-term string into a NUL-term
string of possibly bigger size.  Commit 0efc5990bca5 (&amp;amp;quot;string.h: Introduce
memtostr() and memtostr_pad()&amp;amp;quot;) provides additional information in that
regard.  So if this happens, the following warning is observed:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;strnlen: detected buffer overflow: 65 byte read of buffer size 64
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 28655 at lib/string_helpers.c:1032 __fortify_report+0x96/0xc0 lib/string_helpers.c:1032
Modules linked in:
CPU: 0 UID: 0 PID: 28655 Comm: syz-executor.3 Not tainted 6.12.54-syzkaller-00144-g5f0270f1ba00 #0
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2 04/01/2014
RIP: 0010:__fortify_report+0x96/0xc0 lib/string_helpers.c:1032
Call Trace:
 &amp;amp;lt;TASK&amp;amp;gt;
 __fortify_panic+0x1f/0x30 lib/s…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3704</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-64046</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64046</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 218 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: tls: prevent chain-after-chain in plain text SG Sashiko points out that if end = 0 (start != 0) the current code will create a chain link to content type right after the wrap link:   This would create a chain where the wrap link points directly   to another chain link. The scatterlist API sg_next iterator   does not recursively resolve consecutive chain links. meaning this is illegal input to crypto. The wrapping link is unnecessary if end = 0. end is the entry after the last one used so end = 0 means there&amp;#39;s nothing pushed after the wrap:    end         start            i     v            v              v   [   ]...[   ][ d ][ d ][ d ][ d ][rsv for wrap] Skip the wrapping in this case. TLS 1.3 can use the &amp;#34;wrapping slot&amp;#34; for it&amp;#39;s chaining if end = 0. This avoids the chain-after-chain. Move the wrap chaining before marking END and chaining off content type, that feels like more logical ordering to me, but should not matter from functional perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.4, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3 and 218 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net: tls: prevent chain-after-chain in plain text SG Sashiko points out that if end = 0 (start != 0) the current code will create a chain link to content type right after the wrap link:   This would create a chain where the wrap link points directly   to another chain link. The scatterlist API sg_next iterator   does not recursively resolve consecutive chain links. meaning this is illegal input to crypto. The wrapping link is unnecessary if end = 0. end is the entry after the last one used so end = 0 means there&amp;#39;s nothing pushed after the wrap:    end         start            i     v            v              v   [   ]...[   ][ d ][ d ][ d ][ d ][rsv for wrap] Skip the wrapping in this case. TLS 1.3 can use the &amp;#34;wrapping slot&amp;#34; for it&amp;#39;s chaining if end = 0. This avoids the chain-after-chain. Move the wrap chaining before marking END and chaining off content type, that feels like more logical ordering to me, but should not matter from functional perspective.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-64046</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2403 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2403</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
