<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 07:23:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-63908</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-63908</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-63908</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0926 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0926</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0926</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0926</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-338690</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-338690</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-338690</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-338690</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-63908</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-63908</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Input: atmel_mxt_ts - fix boundary check in mxt_prepare_cfg_mem&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a configuration file provides an object size that is larger than the
driver&amp;#39;s known mxt_obj_size(object), the driver intends to discard the
extra bytes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The loop iterates using for (i = 0; i &amp;lt; size; i++). Inside the loop, the
condition to skip processing extra bytes is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (i &amp;gt; mxt_obj_size(object))
        continue;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since i is a 0-based index, the valid indices for the object are 0 through
mxt_obj_size(object) - 1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When i == mxt_obj_size(object), the condition evaluates to false, and the
code processes the byte instead of discarding it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This causes the code to calculate byte_offset = reg + i - cfg-&amp;gt;start_ofs
and writes the byte there, overwriting exactly one byte of the adjacent
instance or object.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Update the boundary check to skip extra bytes correctly by using &amp;gt;=.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Input: atmel_mxt_ts - fix boundary check in mxt_prepare_cfg_mem&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a configuration file provides an object size that is larger than the
driver&amp;#39;s known mxt_obj_size(object), the driver intends to discard the
extra bytes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The loop iterates using for (i = 0; i &amp;lt; size; i++). Inside the loop, the
condition to skip processing extra bytes is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (i &amp;gt; mxt_obj_size(object))
        continue;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since i is a 0-based index, the valid indices for the object are 0 through
mxt_obj_size(object) - 1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When i == mxt_obj_size(object), the condition evaluates to false, and the
code processes the byte instead of discarding it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This causes the code to calculate byte_offset = reg + i - cfg-&amp;gt;start_ofs
and writes the byte there, overwriting exactly one byte of the adjacent
instance or object.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Update the boundary check to skip extra bytes correctly by using &amp;gt;=.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-63908</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-g59q-3pwp-9gcx</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g59q-3pwp-9gcx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Input: atmel_mxt_ts - fix boundary check in mxt_prepare_cfg_mem&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a configuration file provides an object size that is larger than the
driver&amp;#39;s known mxt_obj_size(object), the driver intends to discard the
extra bytes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The loop iterates using for (i = 0; i &amp;lt; size; i++). Inside the loop, the
condition to skip processing extra bytes is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (i &amp;gt; mxt_obj_size(object))
        continue;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since i is a 0-based index, the valid indices for the object are 0 through
mxt_obj_size(object) - 1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When i == mxt_obj_size(object), the condition evaluates to false, and the
code processes the byte instead of discarding it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This causes the code to calculate byte_offset = reg + i - cfg-&amp;gt;start_ofs
and writes the byte there, overwriting exactly one byte of the adjacent
instance or object.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Update the boundary check to skip extra bytes correctly by using &amp;gt;=.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Input: atmel_mxt_ts - fix boundary check in mxt_prepare_cfg_mem&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a configuration file provides an object size that is larger than the
driver&amp;#39;s known mxt_obj_size(object), the driver intends to discard the
extra bytes.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The loop iterates using for (i = 0; i &amp;lt; size; i++). Inside the loop, the
condition to skip processing extra bytes is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;if (i &amp;gt; mxt_obj_size(object))
        continue;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since i is a 0-based index, the valid indices for the object are 0 through
mxt_obj_size(object) - 1.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When i == mxt_obj_size(object), the condition evaluates to false, and the
code processes the byte instead of discarding it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This causes the code to calculate byte_offset = reg + i - cfg-&amp;gt;start_ofs
and writes the byte there, overwriting exactly one byte of the adjacent
instance or object.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Update the boundary check to skip extra bytes correctly by using &amp;gt;=.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-g59q-3pwp-9gcx</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:21555-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21555-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21555-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:23066-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23066-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23066-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-63908</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-63908</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge and 245 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: atmel_mxt_ts - fix boundary check in mxt_prepare_cfg_mem When a configuration file provides an object size that is larger than the driver&amp;#39;s known mxt_obj_size(object), the driver intends to discard the extra bytes. The loop iterates using for (i = 0; i &amp;lt; size; i++). Inside the loop, the condition to skip processing extra bytes is:     if (i &amp;gt; mxt_obj_size(object))         continue; Since i is a 0-based index, the valid indices for the object are 0 through mxt_obj_size(object) - 1. When i == mxt_obj_size(object), the condition evaluates to false, and the code processes the byte instead of discarding it. This causes the code to calculate byte_offset = reg + i - cfg-&amp;gt;start_ofs and writes the byte there, overwriting exactly one byte of the adjacent instance or object. Update the boundary check to skip extra bytes correctly by using &amp;gt;=.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge and 245 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Input: atmel_mxt_ts - fix boundary check in mxt_prepare_cfg_mem When a configuration file provides an object size that is larger than the driver&amp;#39;s known mxt_obj_size(object), the driver intends to discard the extra bytes. The loop iterates using for (i = 0; i &amp;lt; size; i++). Inside the loop, the condition to skip processing extra bytes is:     if (i &amp;gt; mxt_obj_size(object))         continue; Since i is a 0-based index, the valid indices for the object are 0 through mxt_obj_size(object) - 1. When i == mxt_obj_size(object), the condition evaluates to false, and the code processes the byte instead of discarding it. This causes the code to calculate byte_offset = reg + i - cfg-&amp;gt;start_ofs and writes the byte there, overwriting exactly one byte of the adjacent instance or object. Update the boundary check to skip extra bytes correctly by using &amp;gt;=.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-63908</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2403 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2403</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
