<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 21:18:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-63807</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-63807</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-63807</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0957 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0957</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0957</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0957</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-353129</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-353129</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-353129</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-353129</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-63807</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-63807</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure hugepage is in by slot before checking max mapping level&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When recovering hugepages in the shadow MMU, verify that the base gfn of
the shadow page is actually contained within the target memslot, *before*
querying the max mapping level given the shadow page&amp;#39;s gfn.  Failure to
pre-check the validity of the gfn can lead to an out-of-bounds access to
the slot&amp;#39;s lpage_info (which typically manifests as a host #PF because the
lpage_info is vmalloc&amp;#39;d) if the guest creates a hugepage mapping (in its
PTEs) that extends &amp;#34;below&amp;#34; the bounds of a memslot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When faulting in memory for a guest, and the size of the guest mapping is
greater than KVM&amp;#39;s (current) max mapping, then KVM will create a &amp;#34;direct&amp;#34;
shadow page (direct in that there are no gPTEs to shadow, and so the target
gfn is a direct calculation given the base gfn of the shadow page).  The
hugepage recovery flow looks for such direct shadow pages, as forcing 4KiB
mappings when dirty logging generates the guest &amp;gt; host mapping size case.
When the 4KiB restriction is lifted, then KVM can replace the shadow page
with a hugepage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But if KVM originally used a smaller mapping than the guest because the
range of memory covered by the guest hugepage exceeds the bounds of a
memslot, then KVM will link a direct shadow page with a gfn that is outside
the bounds of the memslot being used to fault in memory.  The rmap entry
added for the leaf mapping is…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure hugepage is in by slot before checking max mapping level&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When recovering hugepages in the shadow MMU, verify that the base gfn of
the shadow page is actually contained within the target memslot, *before*
querying the max mapping level given the shadow page&amp;#39;s gfn.  Failure to
pre-check the validity of the gfn can lead to an out-of-bounds access to
the slot&amp;#39;s lpage_info (which typically manifests as a host #PF because the
lpage_info is vmalloc&amp;#39;d) if the guest creates a hugepage mapping (in its
PTEs) that extends &amp;#34;below&amp;#34; the bounds of a memslot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When faulting in memory for a guest, and the size of the guest mapping is
greater than KVM&amp;#39;s (current) max mapping, then KVM will create a &amp;#34;direct&amp;#34;
shadow page (direct in that there are no gPTEs to shadow, and so the target
gfn is a direct calculation given the base gfn of the shadow page).  The
hugepage recovery flow looks for such direct shadow pages, as forcing 4KiB
mappings when dirty logging generates the guest &amp;gt; host mapping size case.
When the 4KiB restriction is lifted, then KVM can replace the shadow page
with a hugepage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But if KVM originally used a smaller mapping than the guest because the
range of memory covered by the guest hugepage exceeds the bounds of a
memslot, then KVM will link a direct shadow page with a gfn that is outside
the bounds of the memslot being used to fault in memory.  The rmap entry
added for the leaf mapping is…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-63807</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-xxf6-pvjr-qhj4</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-xxf6-pvjr-qhj4</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure hugepage is in by slot before checking max mapping level&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When recovering hugepages in the shadow MMU, verify that the base gfn of
the shadow page is actually contained within the target memslot, *before*
querying the max mapping level given the shadow page&amp;#39;s gfn.  Failure to
pre-check the validity of the gfn can lead to an out-of-bounds access to
the slot&amp;#39;s lpage_info (which typically manifests as a host #PF because the
lpage_info is vmalloc&amp;#39;d) if the guest creates a hugepage mapping (in its
PTEs) that extends &amp;#34;below&amp;#34; the bounds of a memslot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When faulting in memory for a guest, and the size of the guest mapping is
greater than KVM&amp;#39;s (current) max mapping, then KVM will create a &amp;#34;direct&amp;#34;
shadow page (direct in that there are no gPTEs to shadow, and so the target
gfn is a direct calculation given the base gfn of the shadow page).  The
hugepage recovery flow looks for such direct shadow pages, as forcing 4KiB
mappings when dirty logging generates the guest &amp;gt; host mapping size case.
When the 4KiB restriction is lifted, then KVM can replace the shadow page
with a hugepage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But if KVM originally used a smaller mapping than the guest because the
range of memory covered by the guest hugepage exceeds the bounds of a
memslot, then KVM will link a direct shadow page with a gfn that is outside
the bounds of the memslot being used to fault in memory.  The rmap entry
added for the leaf mapping is…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure hugepage is in by slot before checking max mapping level&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When recovering hugepages in the shadow MMU, verify that the base gfn of
the shadow page is actually contained within the target memslot, *before*
querying the max mapping level given the shadow page&amp;#39;s gfn.  Failure to
pre-check the validity of the gfn can lead to an out-of-bounds access to
the slot&amp;#39;s lpage_info (which typically manifests as a host #PF because the
lpage_info is vmalloc&amp;#39;d) if the guest creates a hugepage mapping (in its
PTEs) that extends &amp;#34;below&amp;#34; the bounds of a memslot.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When faulting in memory for a guest, and the size of the guest mapping is
greater than KVM&amp;#39;s (current) max mapping, then KVM will create a &amp;#34;direct&amp;#34;
shadow page (direct in that there are no gPTEs to shadow, and so the target
gfn is a direct calculation given the base gfn of the shadow page).  The
hugepage recovery flow looks for such direct shadow pages, as forcing 4KiB
mappings when dirty logging generates the guest &amp;gt; host mapping size case.
When the 4KiB restriction is lifted, then KVM can replace the shadow page
with a hugepage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But if KVM originally used a smaller mapping than the guest because the
range of memory covered by the guest hugepage exceeds the bounds of a
memslot, then KVM will link a direct shadow page with a gfn that is outside
the bounds of the memslot being used to fault in memory.  The rmap entry
added for the leaf mapping is…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-xxf6-pvjr-qhj4</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-63807 — KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure hugepage is in by slot before checking max mapping level</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-63807</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-63807</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-63807</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-3317 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3317</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drm/amdgpu: prevent immediate PASID reuse case&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PASID resue could cause interrupt issue when process
immediately runs into hw state left by previous
process exited with the same PASID, it&amp;amp;apos;s possible that
page faults are still pending in the IH ring buffer when
the process exits and frees up its PASID. To prevent the
case, it uses idr cyclic allocator same as kernel pid&amp;amp;apos;s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(cherry picked from commit 8f1de51f49be692de137c8525106e0fce2d1912d)(CVE-2026-31462)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;media: hackrf: fix to not free memory after the device is registered in hackrf_probe()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In hackrf driver, the following race condition occurs:
```
		CPU0						CPU1
hackrf_probe()
  kzalloc(); // alloc hackrf_dev
  ....
  v4l2_device_register();
  ....
						fd = sys_open(&amp;amp;quot;/path/to/dev&amp;amp;quot;); // open hackrf fd
						....
  v4l2_device_unregister();
  ....
  kfree(); // free hackrf_dev
  ....
						sys_ioctl(fd, ...);
						  v4l2_ioctl();
						    video_is_registered() // UAF!!
						....
						sys_close(fd);
						  v4l2_release() // UAF!!
						    hackrf_video_release()
						      kfree(); // DFB!!
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a V4L2 or video device is unregistered, the device node is removed so
new open() calls are blocked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, file descriptors that are already open-and any in-flight I/O-do
not terminate i…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drm/amdgpu: prevent immediate PASID reuse case&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;PASID resue could cause interrupt issue when process
immediately runs into hw state left by previous
process exited with the same PASID, it&amp;amp;apos;s possible that
page faults are still pending in the IH ring buffer when
the process exits and frees up its PASID. To prevent the
case, it uses idr cyclic allocator same as kernel pid&amp;amp;apos;s.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(cherry picked from commit 8f1de51f49be692de137c8525106e0fce2d1912d)(CVE-2026-31462)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;media: hackrf: fix to not free memory after the device is registered in hackrf_probe()&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In hackrf driver, the following race condition occurs:
```
		CPU0						CPU1
hackrf_probe()
  kzalloc(); // alloc hackrf_dev
  ....
  v4l2_device_register();
  ....
						fd = sys_open(&amp;amp;quot;/path/to/dev&amp;amp;quot;); // open hackrf fd
						....
  v4l2_device_unregister();
  ....
  kfree(); // free hackrf_dev
  ....
						sys_ioctl(fd, ...);
						  v4l2_ioctl();
						    video_is_registered() // UAF!!
						....
						sys_close(fd);
						  v4l2_release() // UAF!!
						    hackrf_video_release()
						      kfree(); // DFB!!
```&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When a V4L2 or video device is unregistered, the device node is removed so
new open() calls are blocked.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;However, file descriptors that are already open-and any in-flight I/O-do
not terminate i…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3317</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11339-1 — kernel-devel-7.1.4-1.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11339-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.1.4-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel-devel-7.1.4-1.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11339-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2026:49030 — Red Hat Security Advisory: kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:49030</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;kernel: KVM: x86: Don&amp;#39;t (re)check L1 intercepts when completing userspace I/O kernel: KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure hugepage is in by slot before checking max mapping level kernel: KVM: x86: Check for invalid/obsolete root *after* making MMU pages available&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;kernel: KVM: x86: Don&amp;#39;t (re)check L1 intercepts when completing userspace I/O kernel: KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure hugepage is in by slot before checking max mapping level kernel: KVM: x86: Check for invalid/obsolete root *after* making MMU pages available&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:49030</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:23066-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23066-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23066-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-63807</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-63807</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 193 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure hugepage is in by slot before checking max mapping level When recovering hugepages in the shadow MMU, verify that the base gfn of the shadow page is actually contained within the target memslot, *before* querying the max mapping level given the shadow page&amp;#39;s gfn.  Failure to pre-check the validity of the gfn can lead to an out-of-bounds access to the slot&amp;#39;s lpage_info (which typically manifests as a host #PF because the lpage_info is vmalloc&amp;#39;d) if the guest creates a hugepage mapping (in its PTEs) that extends &amp;#34;below&amp;#34; the bounds of a memslot. When faulting in memory for a guest, and the size of the guest mapping is greater than KVM&amp;#39;s (current) max mapping, then KVM will create a &amp;#34;direct&amp;#34; shadow page (direct in that there are no gPTEs to shadow, and so the target gfn is a direct calculation given the base gfn of the shadow page).  The hugepage recovery flow looks for such direct shadow pages, as forcing 4KiB mappings when dirty logging generates the guest &amp;gt; host mapping size case. When the 4KiB restriction is lifted, then KVM can replace the shadow page with a hugepage. But if KVM originally used a smaller mapping than the guest because the range of memory covered by the guest hugepage exceeds the bounds of a memslot, then KVM will link a direct shadow page with a gfn that is outside the bounds of the memslot being used to fault in memory.  The rmap entry added for the leaf mapping is cor…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 193 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: x86/mmu: Ensure hugepage is in by slot before checking max mapping level When recovering hugepages in the shadow MMU, verify that the base gfn of the shadow page is actually contained within the target memslot, *before* querying the max mapping level given the shadow page&amp;#39;s gfn.  Failure to pre-check the validity of the gfn can lead to an out-of-bounds access to the slot&amp;#39;s lpage_info (which typically manifests as a host #PF because the lpage_info is vmalloc&amp;#39;d) if the guest creates a hugepage mapping (in its PTEs) that extends &amp;#34;below&amp;#34; the bounds of a memslot. When faulting in memory for a guest, and the size of the guest mapping is greater than KVM&amp;#39;s (current) max mapping, then KVM will create a &amp;#34;direct&amp;#34; shadow page (direct in that there are no gPTEs to shadow, and so the target gfn is a direct calculation given the base gfn of the shadow page).  The hugepage recovery flow looks for such direct shadow pages, as forcing 4KiB mappings when dirty logging generates the guest &amp;gt; host mapping size case. When the 4KiB restriction is lifted, then KVM can replace the shadow page with a hugepage. But if KVM originally used a smaller mapping than the guest because the range of memory covered by the guest hugepage exceeds the bounds of a memslot, then KVM will link a direct shadow page with a gfn that is outside the bounds of the memslot being used to fault in memory.  The rmap entry added for the leaf mapping is cor…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-63807</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2403 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2403</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
