<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2026 21:09:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-330568</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-330568</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-330568</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-330568</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-6331</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-6331</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;HMAC zero-length tag forgery in EVP_DigestVerifyFinal, where a zero-length tag could be accepted as valid during HMAC verification. In the OpenSSL-compatibility HMAC verify path the supplied signature length was only checked as not exceeding the MAC length, so a zero-length or otherwise truncated tag could pass verification. The fix requires the supplied tag length to exactly equal the MAC length and rejects a zero-length MAC, so a forged short or empty tag is no longer accepted.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;HMAC zero-length tag forgery in EVP_DigestVerifyFinal, where a zero-length tag could be accepted as valid during HMAC verification. In the OpenSSL-compatibility HMAC verify path the supplied signature length was only checked as not exceeding the MAC length, so a zero-length or otherwise truncated tag could pass verification. The fix requires the supplied tag length to exactly equal the MAC length and rejects a zero-length MAC, so a forged short or empty tag is no longer accepted.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-6331</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-5hpf-pc4x-3jcf</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-5hpf-pc4x-3jcf</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;HMAC zero-length tag forgery in EVP_DigestVerifyFinal, where a zero-length tag could be accepted as valid during HMAC verification. In the OpenSSL-compatibility HMAC verify path the supplied signature length was only checked as not exceeding the MAC length, so a zero-length or otherwise truncated tag could pass verification. The fix requires the supplied tag length to exactly equal the MAC length and rejects a zero-length MAC, so a forged short or empty tag is no longer accepted.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;HMAC zero-length tag forgery in EVP_DigestVerifyFinal, where a zero-length tag could be accepted as valid during HMAC verification. In the OpenSSL-compatibility HMAC verify path the supplied signature length was only checked as not exceeding the MAC length, so a zero-length or otherwise truncated tag could pass verification. The fix requires the supplied tag length to exactly equal the MAC length and rejects a zero-length MAC, so a forged short or empty tag is no longer accepted.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-5hpf-pc4x-3jcf</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-6331 — HMAC zero-length tag forgery in EVP_DigestVerifyFinal</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-6331</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-6331</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-6331</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-6331</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-6331</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:25.10: wolfssl, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: wolfssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HMAC zero-length tag forgery in EVP_DigestVerifyFinal, where a zero-length tag could be accepted as valid during HMAC verification. In the OpenSSL-compatibility HMAC verify path the supplied signature length was only checked as not exceeding the MAC length, so a zero-length or otherwise truncated tag could pass verification. The fix requires the supplied tag length to exactly equal the MAC length and rejects a zero-length MAC, so a forged short or empty tag is no longer accepted.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:25.10: wolfssl, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: wolfssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;HMAC zero-length tag forgery in EVP_DigestVerifyFinal, where a zero-length tag could be accepted as valid during HMAC verification. In the OpenSSL-compatibility HMAC verify path the supplied signature length was only checked as not exceeding the MAC length, so a zero-length or otherwise truncated tag could pass verification. The fix requires the supplied tag length to exactly equal the MAC length and rejects a zero-length MAC, so a forged short or empty tag is no longer accepted.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-6331</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
