https://cve.radiocsirt.org Contains only the most 10 recent entries. http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification python-feedgen en Fri, 02 Oct 2026 19:32:22 +0000 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-330511 EUVD-2026-330511 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-330511 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-6330 <p>The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform&#39;s implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard&#39;s required implicit rejection.</p> <p>The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform&#39;s implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard&#39;s required implicit rejection.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-6330 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-89v8-3927-wfcg <p>The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform&#39;s implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard&#39;s required implicit rejection.</p> <p>The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform&#39;s implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard&#39;s required implicit rejection.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-89v8-3927-wfcg https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-6330 msrc_CVE-2026-6330 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-6330 https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-6330 <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:25.10: wolfssl, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: wolfssl</p> <p>The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform&#39;s implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard&#39;s required implicit rejection.</p> <p><strong>Affected:</strong> Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:20.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:22.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:24.04:LTS: wolfssl, Ubuntu:25.10: wolfssl, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: wolfssl</p> <p>The ML-KEM ARM64 NEON ciphertext comparison only compares half of the input, breaking the Fujisaki-Okamoto transform&#39;s implicit rejection and weakening IND-CCA2 security on that code path. The constant-time comparison effectively ignored part of the re-encrypted ciphertext, so a decapsulating party could fail to detect a manipulated ciphertext and proceed without the standard&#39;s required implicit rejection.</p> https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-6330