<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 13:08:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>ALSA-2026:67154 — Important: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2026:67154</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; AlmaLinux:10: openssl, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-devel, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-libs, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-perl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)
  * openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)
  * openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)
  * openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)
  * openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)
  * openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)
  * openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)
  * openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)
  * openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [AlmaLinux 10.2.z] (JIRA:AlmaLinux-212362)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; AlmaLinux:10: openssl, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-devel, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-libs, AlmaLinux:10: openssl-perl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)
  * openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)
  * openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)
  * openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)
  * openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)
  * openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)
  * openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)
  * openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)
  * openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [AlmaLinux 10.2.z] (JIRA:AlmaLinux-212362)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/alsa-2026:67154</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-14719</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-14719</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-14719</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-14719</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-63073</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-63073</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: openssl, Alpaquita:stream: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:25: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:stream: openssl&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:25: openssl, Alpaquita:stream: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:25: openssl, BellSoft Hardened Containers:stream: openssl&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-63073</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-1079 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans OpenSSL. Elles permettent à un attaquant de provoquer un déni de s…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1079</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-1079</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-1079</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-362120</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-362120</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-362120</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-362120</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-63073</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-63073</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_data()`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client
that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose
subject becomes the default expected sender.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update()
converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline()
and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent
characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as &amp;#34;CN=%s%n&amp;#34; reaches
BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic
arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected
sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a
CMP client validating server responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic
arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated
stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of
service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint.
There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path
to remote code execution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FIPS impact: no&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol
imple…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_data()`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client
that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose
subject becomes the default expected sender.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update()
converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline()
and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent
characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as &amp;#34;CN=%s%n&amp;#34; reaches
BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic
arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected
sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a
CMP client validating server responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic
arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated
stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of
service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint.
There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path
to remote code execution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FIPS impact: no&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol
imple…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-63073</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-826x-qg76-xqjx</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-826x-qg76-xqjx</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_data()`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client
that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose
subject becomes the default expected sender.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update()
converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline()
and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent
characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as &amp;#34;CN=%s%n&amp;#34; reaches
BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic
arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected
sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a
CMP client validating server responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic
arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated
stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of
service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint.
There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path
to remote code execution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FIPS impact: no&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol
imple…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_data()`.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client
that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose
subject becomes the default expected sender.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update()
converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline()
and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent
characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as &amp;#34;CN=%s%n&amp;#34; reaches
BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic
arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected
sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a
CMP client validating server responses.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic
arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated
stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of
service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint.
There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path
to remote code execution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FIPS impact: no&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol
imple…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-826x-qg76-xqjx</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-63073 — Untrusted Sender DN Used as Format String in CMP Response Validation</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-63073</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-63073</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-63073</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-3830 — openssl security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3830</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP4: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs)
enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally,
a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and
also sends the typically omitted &amp;amp;quot;signature_algorithms_cert&amp;amp;quot; TLS extension.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of
an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests
that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration
is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or
signed by any convenient CA).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the
&amp;amp;quot;signature_algorithms_cert&amp;amp;quot; extension is handled reliably even without the
fix, and peer clients or servers that don&amp;amp;apos;t support raw public keys may be
able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding
certificate or its public key.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate
need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FIPS impact: no&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No FIP…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP4: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs)
enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally,
a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and
also sends the typically omitted &amp;amp;quot;signature_algorithms_cert&amp;amp;quot; TLS extension.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of
an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests
that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration
is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or
signed by any convenient CA).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the
&amp;amp;quot;signature_algorithms_cert&amp;amp;quot; extension is handled reliably even without the
fix, and peer clients or servers that don&amp;amp;apos;t support raw public keys may be
able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding
certificate or its public key.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate
need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FIPS impact: no&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No FIP…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3830</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:11623-1 — libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-8.1 on GA media</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11623-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-8.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-8.1 on GA media&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:11623-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RHSA-2026:59635 — Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:59635</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer overflow due to signed integer overflow in Unicode output sizing openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to heap out-of-bounds read in CMS password-based decryption openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer over-read in ASN.1 decoding can lead to denial of service or information disclosure. openssl: PKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys openssl: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages openssl: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler openssl: Double-free When Checking OCSP Stapled Response openssl: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling openssl: NULL Dereference in Certificate Verification with OCSP Checking openssl: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption openssl: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption openssl: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() openssl: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate openssl: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q openssl: Possible Out of Bounds Read in X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_email() openssl: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path openssl: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes openssl: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_veri…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer overflow due to signed integer overflow in Unicode output sizing openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service due to heap out-of-bounds read in CMS password-based decryption openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet openssl: OpenSSL: Heap buffer over-read in ASN.1 decoding can lead to denial of service or information disclosure. openssl: PKCS#12 Files with PBMAC1 Are Accepted with Short HMAC Keys openssl: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages openssl: Unbounded Memory Growth in the QUIC PATH_CHALLENGE Handler openssl: Double-free When Checking OCSP Stapled Response openssl: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling openssl: NULL Dereference in Certificate Verification with OCSP Checking openssl: Possible NULL Dereference in Password-Based CMS Decryption openssl: NULL Pointer Dereference in CRMF EncryptedValue Decryption openssl: Multi-RecipientInfo Bleichenbacher Oracle in CMS_decrypt() and PKCS7_decrypt() openssl: Trust-Anchor Substitution via cert/issuer Typo in CMP rootCaKeyUpdate openssl: FFC-DH Peer Validation Uses Attacker-Supplied q openssl: Possible Out of Bounds Read in X509_VERIFY_PARAM_set1_email() openssl: AES-OCB IV Ignored on EVP_Cipher() Path openssl: Incorrect Tag Processing for Empty Messages in AES-GCM-SIV and AES-SIV modes openssl: Heap Use-After-Free in OpenSSL PKCS7_veri…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rhsa-2026:59635</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RLSA-2026:67154 — Important: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rlsa-2026:67154</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Rocky Linux:10: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [Rocky Linux 10.2.z] (JIRA:Rocky Linux-212362)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Rocky Linux:10: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;* openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [Rocky Linux 10.2.z] (JIRA:Rocky Linux-212362)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/rlsa-2026:67154</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:23463-1 — Security update for openssl-3</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23463-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-3&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for openssl-3&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23463-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-63073</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-63073</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: nodejs, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: nodejs, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: edk2, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: edk2-hwe, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_data()`. Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender. CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String) Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as &amp;#34;CN=%s%n&amp;#34; reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses. Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution. FIPS impact: no No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementat…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: nodejs, Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS: nodejs, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: edk2, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: edk2-hwe, Ubuntu:26.04:LTS: openssl&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response sender distinguished name directly as the format string to `ERR_raise_data()`. Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender. CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String) Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as &amp;#34;CN=%s%n&amp;#34; reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses. Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution. FIPS impact: no No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementat…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-63073</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-3005 — OpenSSL: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3005</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenSSL ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen in OpenSSL ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, Daten zu manipulieren oder offenzulegen oder einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-3005</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
