<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2026 06:12:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-53368</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-53368</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-53368</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0926 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux d'Ubuntu. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à un a…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0926</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0926</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0926</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-348241</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348241</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-348241</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348241</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-53368</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53368</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry flag usage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs_need_dentry_mark() reads nat_entry flags without mutual exclusion
with the checkpoint path, which can result in an incorrect inode block
marking state. The scenario is as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;create &amp;amp; write &amp;amp; fsync &amp;#39;file A&amp;#39;                 write checkpoint
- f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode
 - f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty
                                                - f2fs_write_checkpoint
                                                 - f2fs_flush_merged_writes
                                                 - f2fs_sync_node_pages
 - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node
 - f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return true
 - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // inode dirtied
  - f2fs_need_dentry_mark //return true
                                                 - f2fs_flush_nat_entries
                                                - f2fs_write_checkpoint end
  - __write_node_folio // inode with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set
  SPO, &amp;#34;fsck --dry-run&amp;#34; find inode has already checkpointed but still
  with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state observed by f2fs_need_dentry_mark() can differ from the state
observed in __write_node_folio() after acquiring sbi-&amp;gt;node_write. The
root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and
HAS_FSYNCED_INODE are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write has
fully completed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch moves set_dentry_mark() into __write_n…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry flag usage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs_need_dentry_mark() reads nat_entry flags without mutual exclusion
with the checkpoint path, which can result in an incorrect inode block
marking state. The scenario is as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;create &amp;amp; write &amp;amp; fsync &amp;#39;file A&amp;#39;                 write checkpoint
- f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode
 - f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty
                                                - f2fs_write_checkpoint
                                                 - f2fs_flush_merged_writes
                                                 - f2fs_sync_node_pages
 - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node
 - f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return true
 - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // inode dirtied
  - f2fs_need_dentry_mark //return true
                                                 - f2fs_flush_nat_entries
                                                - f2fs_write_checkpoint end
  - __write_node_folio // inode with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set
  SPO, &amp;#34;fsck --dry-run&amp;#34; find inode has already checkpointed but still
  with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state observed by f2fs_need_dentry_mark() can differ from the state
observed in __write_node_folio() after acquiring sbi-&amp;gt;node_write. The
root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and
HAS_FSYNCED_INODE are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write has
fully completed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch moves set_dentry_mark() into __write_n…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53368</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-7cj6-gq26-374h</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7cj6-gq26-374h</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry flag usage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs_need_dentry_mark() reads nat_entry flags without mutual exclusion
with the checkpoint path, which can result in an incorrect inode block
marking state. The scenario is as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;create &amp;amp; write &amp;amp; fsync &amp;#39;file A&amp;#39;                 write checkpoint
- f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode
 - f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty
                                                - f2fs_write_checkpoint
                                                 - f2fs_flush_merged_writes
                                                 - f2fs_sync_node_pages
 - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node
 - f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return true
 - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // inode dirtied
  - f2fs_need_dentry_mark //return true
                                                 - f2fs_flush_nat_entries
                                                - f2fs_write_checkpoint end
  - __write_node_folio // inode with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set
  SPO, &amp;#34;fsck --dry-run&amp;#34; find inode has already checkpointed but still
  with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state observed by f2fs_need_dentry_mark() can differ from the state
observed in __write_node_folio() after acquiring sbi-&amp;gt;node_write. The
root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and
HAS_FSYNCED_INODE are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write has
fully completed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch moves set_dentry_mark() into __write_n…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry flag usage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;f2fs_need_dentry_mark() reads nat_entry flags without mutual exclusion
with the checkpoint path, which can result in an incorrect inode block
marking state. The scenario is as follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;create &amp;amp; write &amp;amp; fsync &amp;#39;file A&amp;#39;                 write checkpoint
- f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode
 - f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty
                                                - f2fs_write_checkpoint
                                                 - f2fs_flush_merged_writes
                                                 - f2fs_sync_node_pages
 - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node
 - f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return true
 - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // inode dirtied
  - f2fs_need_dentry_mark //return true
                                                 - f2fs_flush_nat_entries
                                                - f2fs_write_checkpoint end
  - __write_node_folio // inode with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set
  SPO, &amp;#34;fsck --dry-run&amp;#34; find inode has already checkpointed but still
  with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The state observed by f2fs_need_dentry_mark() can differ from the state
observed in __write_node_folio() after acquiring sbi-&amp;gt;node_write. The
root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and
HAS_FSYNCED_INODE are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write has
fully completed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This patch moves set_dentry_mark() into __write_n…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-7cj6-gq26-374h</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-53368 — f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry flag usage</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-53368</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-53368</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-53368</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-53368</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-53368</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge and 244 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry flag usage f2fs_need_dentry_mark() reads nat_entry flags without mutual exclusion with the checkpoint path, which can result in an incorrect inode block marking state. The scenario is as follows: create &amp;amp; write &amp;amp; fsync &amp;#39;file A&amp;#39;                 write checkpoint - f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode  - f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty                                                 - f2fs_write_checkpoint                                                  - f2fs_flush_merged_writes                                                  - f2fs_sync_node_pages  - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node  - f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return true  - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // inode dirtied   - f2fs_need_dentry_mark //return true                                                  - f2fs_flush_nat_entries                                                 - f2fs_write_checkpoint end   - __write_node_folio // inode with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set   SPO, &amp;#34;fsck --dry-run&amp;#34; find inode has already checkpointed but still   with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set The state observed by f2fs_need_dentry_mark() can differ from the state observed in __write_node_folio() after acquiring sbi-&amp;gt;node_write. The root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and HAS_FSYNCED_INODE are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write has fully completed. This patch moves set_dentry_mark() into __write_node_f…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge and 244 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: f2fs: fix fsck inconsistency caused by incorrect nat_entry flag usage f2fs_need_dentry_mark() reads nat_entry flags without mutual exclusion with the checkpoint path, which can result in an incorrect inode block marking state. The scenario is as follows: create &amp;amp; write &amp;amp; fsync &amp;#39;file A&amp;#39;                 write checkpoint - f2fs_do_sync_file // inline inode  - f2fs_write_inode // inode folio is dirty                                                 - f2fs_write_checkpoint                                                  - f2fs_flush_merged_writes                                                  - f2fs_sync_node_pages  - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // no dirty node  - f2fs_need_inode_block_update // return true  - f2fs_fsync_node_pages // inode dirtied   - f2fs_need_dentry_mark //return true                                                  - f2fs_flush_nat_entries                                                 - f2fs_write_checkpoint end   - __write_node_folio // inode with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set   SPO, &amp;#34;fsck --dry-run&amp;#34; find inode has already checkpointed but still   with DENT_BIT_SHIFT set The state observed by f2fs_need_dentry_mark() can differ from the state observed in __write_node_folio() after acquiring sbi-&amp;gt;node_write. The root cause is that the semantics of IS_CHECKPOINTED and HAS_FSYNCED_INODE are only guaranteed after the checkpoint write has fully completed. This patch moves set_dentry_mark() into __write_node_f…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-53368</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2403 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen ermöglichen nicht spezifizierten Angriff</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2403</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um einen nicht näher spezifizierten Angriff durchzuführen, möglicherweise Sicherheitsmaßnahmen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen oder vertrauliche Informationen offenzulegen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2403</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
