<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 03:37:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-13965</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-13965</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-13965</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-13965</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-53035</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-53035</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-53035</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0862 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0862</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0862</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0862</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-329946</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-329946</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-329946</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-329946</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-53035</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53035</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() may deadlock when lock_sock_fast() takes the fast
path and the iter prog attempts to update a sockmap. Which ends up spinning
at sock_map_update_elem()&amp;#39;s bh_lock_sock():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
test_progs/1393 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
       ----
  lock(slock-AF_UNIX);
  lock(slock-AF_UNIX);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4 locks held by test_progs/1393:
 #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0
 #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0
 #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0
 #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80
 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce
 __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590
 lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0
 _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40
 sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0
 bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4
 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00
 bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0
 bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0
 vfs_re…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() may deadlock when lock_sock_fast() takes the fast
path and the iter prog attempts to update a sockmap. Which ends up spinning
at sock_map_update_elem()&amp;#39;s bh_lock_sock():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
test_progs/1393 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
       ----
  lock(slock-AF_UNIX);
  lock(slock-AF_UNIX);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4 locks held by test_progs/1393:
 #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0
 #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0
 #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0
 #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80
 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce
 __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590
 lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0
 _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40
 sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0
 bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4
 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00
 bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0
 bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0
 vfs_re…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-53035</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-9ppp-c797-fg56</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-9ppp-c797-fg56</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() may deadlock when lock_sock_fast() takes the fast
path and the iter prog attempts to update a sockmap. Which ends up spinning
at sock_map_update_elem()&amp;#39;s bh_lock_sock():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
test_progs/1393 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
       ----
  lock(slock-AF_UNIX);
  lock(slock-AF_UNIX);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4 locks held by test_progs/1393:
 #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0
 #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0
 #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0
 #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80
 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce
 __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590
 lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0
 _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40
 sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0
 bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4
 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00
 bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0
 bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0
 vfs_re…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() may deadlock when lock_sock_fast() takes the fast
path and the iter prog attempts to update a sockmap. Which ends up spinning
at sock_map_update_elem()&amp;#39;s bh_lock_sock():&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
test_progs/1393 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;but task is already holding lock:
ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;CPU0
       ----
  lock(slock-AF_UNIX);
  lock(slock-AF_UNIX);&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;*** DEADLOCK ***&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;May be due to missing lock nesting notation&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;4 locks held by test_progs/1393:
 #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0
 #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0
 #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0
 #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80
 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce
 __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590
 lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0
 _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40
 sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0
 bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4
 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00
 bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0
 bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0
 vfs_re…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-9ppp-c797-fg56</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-53035 — bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-53035</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-53035</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-53035</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:21555-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21555-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21555-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:22809-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:22809-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:22809-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-53035</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-53035</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 200 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() may deadlock when lock_sock_fast() takes the fast path and the iter prog attempts to update a sockmap. Which ends up spinning at sock_map_update_elem()&amp;#39;s bh_lock_sock(): WARNING: possible recursive locking detected test_progs/1393 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0 but task is already holding lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0 other info that might help us debug this:  Possible unsafe locking scenario:        CPU0        ----   lock(slock-AF_UNIX);   lock(slock-AF_UNIX);  *** DEADLOCK ***  May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by test_progs/1393:  #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0  #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0  #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0  #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00 Call Trace:  dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80  print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce  __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590  lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0  _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40  sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0  bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4  bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00  bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0  bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0  vfs_read+0x171/0…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.0, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-aws-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-azure-edge, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gcp-5.3, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-4.15, Ubuntu:18.04:LTS: linux-gke-5.4 and 200 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() may deadlock when lock_sock_fast() takes the fast path and the iter prog attempts to update a sockmap. Which ends up spinning at sock_map_update_elem()&amp;#39;s bh_lock_sock(): WARNING: possible recursive locking detected test_progs/1393 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0 but task is already holding lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0 other info that might help us debug this:  Possible unsafe locking scenario:        CPU0        ----   lock(slock-AF_UNIX);   lock(slock-AF_UNIX);  *** DEADLOCK ***  May be due to missing lock nesting notation 4 locks held by test_progs/1393:  #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&amp;amp;p-&amp;gt;lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0  #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0  #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0  #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00 Call Trace:  dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80  print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce  __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590  lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0  _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40  sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0  bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4  bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00  bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0  bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0  vfs_read+0x171/0…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-53035</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2077 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2077</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und weitere, nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und weitere, nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
