<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?>
<?xml-stylesheet href="/static/style.xsl" type="text/xsl"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Most recent entries from all</title>
    <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org</link>
    <description>Contains only the most 10 recent entries.</description>
    <docs>http://www.rssboard.org/rss-specification</docs>
    <generator>python-feedgen</generator>
    <language>en</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2026 09:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <item>
      <title>bdu:2026-13934</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-13934</link>
      <description>bdu:2026-13934</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bdu:2026-13934</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BELL-CVE-2026-52981</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-52981</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Alpaquita:23: linux-lts, Alpaquita:25: linux-lts, Alpaquita:stream: linux-lts&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/bell-cve-2026-52981</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>certfr-2026-avi-0862 — De multiples vulnérabilités ont été découvertes dans le noyau Linux de Debian LTS. Certaines d'entre elles permettent à…</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0862</link>
      <description>certfr-2026-avi-0862</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/certfr-2026-avi-0862</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>EUVD-2026-348120</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348120</link>
      <description>EUVD-2026-348120</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/euvd-2026-348120</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>fkie_cve-2026-52981</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-52981</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;neigh: let neigh_xmit take skb ownership&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;neigh_xmit always releases the skb, except when no neighbour table is
found. But even the first added user of neigh_xmit (mpls) relied on
neigh_xmit to release the skb (or queue it for tx).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sashiko reported:
 If neigh_xmit() is called with an uninitialized neighbor table (for
 example, NEIGH_ND_TABLE when IPv6 is disabled), it returns -EAFNOSUPPORT
 and bypasses its internal out_kfree_skb error path.  Because the return
 value of neigh_xmit() is ignored here, does this leak the SKB?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Assume full ownership and remove the last code path that doesn&amp;#39;t
xmit or free skb.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;neigh: let neigh_xmit take skb ownership&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;neigh_xmit always releases the skb, except when no neighbour table is
found. But even the first added user of neigh_xmit (mpls) relied on
neigh_xmit to release the skb (or queue it for tx).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sashiko reported:
 If neigh_xmit() is called with an uninitialized neighbor table (for
 example, NEIGH_ND_TABLE when IPv6 is disabled), it returns -EAFNOSUPPORT
 and bypasses its internal out_kfree_skb error path.  Because the return
 value of neigh_xmit() is ignored here, does this leak the SKB?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Assume full ownership and remove the last code path that doesn&amp;#39;t
xmit or free skb.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/fkie_cve-2026-52981</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>GHSA-36qf-2q77-7jh9</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-36qf-2q77-7jh9</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;neigh: let neigh_xmit take skb ownership&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;neigh_xmit always releases the skb, except when no neighbour table is
found. But even the first added user of neigh_xmit (mpls) relied on
neigh_xmit to release the skb (or queue it for tx).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sashiko reported:
 If neigh_xmit() is called with an uninitialized neighbor table (for
 example, NEIGH_ND_TABLE when IPv6 is disabled), it returns -EAFNOSUPPORT
 and bypasses its internal out_kfree_skb error path.  Because the return
 value of neigh_xmit() is ignored here, does this leak the SKB?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Assume full ownership and remove the last code path that doesn&amp;#39;t
xmit or free skb.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;neigh: let neigh_xmit take skb ownership&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;neigh_xmit always releases the skb, except when no neighbour table is
found. But even the first added user of neigh_xmit (mpls) relied on
neigh_xmit to release the skb (or queue it for tx).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;sashiko reported:
 If neigh_xmit() is called with an uninitialized neighbor table (for
 example, NEIGH_ND_TABLE when IPv6 is disabled), it returns -EAFNOSUPPORT
 and bypasses its internal out_kfree_skb error path.  Because the return
 value of neigh_xmit() is ignored here, does this leak the SKB?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Assume full ownership and remove the last code path that doesn&amp;#39;t
xmit or free skb.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ghsa-36qf-2q77-7jh9</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>msrc_CVE-2026-52981 — neigh: let neigh_xmit take skb ownership</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-52981</link>
      <description>msrc_CVE-2026-52981</description>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/msrc_cve-2026-52981</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>OESA-2026-3156 — kernel security update</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3156</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drbd: add missing kref_get in handle_write_conflicts&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With `two-primaries` enabled, DRBD tries to detect &amp;amp;quot;concurrent&amp;amp;quot; writes
and handle write conflicts, so that even if you write to the same sector
simultaneously on both nodes, they end up with the identical data once
the writes are completed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In handling &amp;amp;quot;superseeded&amp;amp;quot; writes, we forgot a kref_get,
resulting in a premature drbd_destroy_device and use after free,
and further to kernel crashes with symptoms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Relevance: No one should use DRBD as a random data generator, and apparently
all users of &amp;amp;quot;two-primaries&amp;amp;quot; handle concurrent writes correctly on layer up.
That is cluster file systems use some distributed lock manager,
and live migration in virtualization environments stops writes on one node
before starting writes on the other node.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which means that other than for &amp;amp;quot;test cases&amp;amp;quot;,
this code path is never taken in real life.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FYI, in DRBD 9, things are handled differently nowadays.  We still detect
&amp;amp;quot;write conflicts&amp;amp;quot;, but no longer try to be smart about them.
We decided to disconnect hard instead: upper layers must not submit concurrent
writes. If they do, that&amp;amp;apos;s their fault.(CVE-2025-38708)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: mwifiex: Initialize the chan_stats array to zero&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The adapter-&amp;amp;gt…&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; openEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4: kernel&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Linux Kernel, the operating system core itself.&#13;
&#13;
Security Fix(es):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;drbd: add missing kref_get in handle_write_conflicts&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;With `two-primaries` enabled, DRBD tries to detect &amp;amp;quot;concurrent&amp;amp;quot; writes
and handle write conflicts, so that even if you write to the same sector
simultaneously on both nodes, they end up with the identical data once
the writes are completed.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In handling &amp;amp;quot;superseeded&amp;amp;quot; writes, we forgot a kref_get,
resulting in a premature drbd_destroy_device and use after free,
and further to kernel crashes with symptoms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Relevance: No one should use DRBD as a random data generator, and apparently
all users of &amp;amp;quot;two-primaries&amp;amp;quot; handle concurrent writes correctly on layer up.
That is cluster file systems use some distributed lock manager,
and live migration in virtualization environments stops writes on one node
before starting writes on the other node.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Which means that other than for &amp;amp;quot;test cases&amp;amp;quot;,
this code path is never taken in real life.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FYI, in DRBD 9, things are handled differently nowadays.  We still detect
&amp;amp;quot;write conflicts&amp;amp;quot;, but no longer try to be smart about them.
We decided to disconnect hard instead: upper layers must not submit concurrent
writes. If they do, that&amp;amp;apos;s their fault.(CVE-2025-38708)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;wifi: mwifiex: Initialize the chan_stats array to zero&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The adapter-&amp;amp;gt…&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/oesa-2026-3156</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>openSUSE-SU-2026:21555-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21555-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/opensuse-su-2026:21555-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SUSE-SU-2026:23066-1 — Security update for the Linux Kernel</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23066-1</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Security update for the Linux Kernel&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/suse-su-2026:23066-1</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UBUNTU-CVE-2026-52981</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-52981</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge and 252 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: neigh: let neigh_xmit take skb ownership neigh_xmit always releases the skb, except when no neighbour table is found. But even the first added user of neigh_xmit (mpls) relied on neigh_xmit to release the skb (or queue it for tx). sashiko reported:  If neigh_xmit() is called with an uninitialized neighbor table (for  example, NEIGH_ND_TABLE when IPv6 is disabled), it returns -EAFNOSUPPORT  and bypasses its internal out_kfree_skb error path.  Because the return  value of neigh_xmit() is ignored here, does this leak the SKB? Assume full ownership and remove the last code path that doesn&amp;#39;t xmit or free skb.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Affected:&lt;/strong&gt; Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS: linux-lts-xenial, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-aws-hwe, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-azure, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-gcp, Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe, Ubuntu:16.04:LTS: linux-hwe-edge and 252 more&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: neigh: let neigh_xmit take skb ownership neigh_xmit always releases the skb, except when no neighbour table is found. But even the first added user of neigh_xmit (mpls) relied on neigh_xmit to release the skb (or queue it for tx). sashiko reported:  If neigh_xmit() is called with an uninitialized neighbor table (for  example, NEIGH_ND_TABLE when IPv6 is disabled), it returns -EAFNOSUPPORT  and bypasses its internal out_kfree_skb error path.  Because the return  value of neigh_xmit() is ignored here, does this leak the SKB? Assume full ownership and remove the last code path that doesn&amp;#39;t xmit or free skb.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/ubuntu-cve-2026-52981</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WID-SEC-W-2026-2077 — Linux Kernel: Mehrere Schwachstellen</title>
      <link>https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2077</link>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und weitere, nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;Ein entfernter Angreifer kann mehrere Schwachstellen im Linux Kernel ausnutzen, um Sicherheitsvorkehrungen zu umgehen, einen Denial-of-Service-Zustand herbeizuführen und weitere, nicht näher spezifizierte Auswirkungen zu erzielen.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">https://cve.radiocsirt.org/vuln/wid-sec-w-2026-2077</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
